9-11 and 'The Science'. Is the 9-11 narrative true?
Most of what we are told by the Government-Media-'Science'-Disinformation complex is simply a lie. Is 9-11 another one?
(a controlled nuclear blast from below would force an explosion upwards into a hot cloud mushroom design (9-11), unlike a controlled demolition, which uses gravity and forces the mass of matter down (Honolulu 1994)
“Truth is incontrovertible. Panic may resent it, ignorance may deride it, malice may distort it, but there it is.” (Winston Churchill, May 17th, 1916, HoC speech)
My bias
Few are as opposed to the Muslim Jihad and the cult of ‘Islam’ or ‘Submission’ as I am. I have published books on the topic which investigate the 1400-year Jihad against civilisation by the moon cult of Muhammad, or as I would term it, a fascist-paganism. Most people in the fast imploding, immoral and degenerate ‘West’ do not understand where the term ‘West’ comes from. ‘The West’ described the ‘western-rump’ of what remained from the once vast empire of Christendom, most of it conquered by the Muslim Jihad by 1000 A.D. Historically the cult of Muhammad has proven itself far more Christophobic in word and deed, than anti-semitic.
The Narrative
This is my bias. This is why I originally accepted 9-11 at face value. The narrative that Muslims had hijacked jet airliners and flown them into the South and North Towers in Manhattan appeared to be self-evident, supported by video and photographic evidence. That the towers would then collapse given such an impact seemed plausible. Given the bloody, brutal, immoral, uncivilised and persistently evil expansion of the Muslim Jihad over 1400 years, such an attack would seem both logical and expected.
Neo and changing your mind
Things change. Real science does not. I read the 9-11 Commission Report (book), which was rushed into production in a short amount of time and believed it. But as with evolution, the moon landing, cosmology, physics, vaccines, medical science, Jenner, Pasteur, Einstein, the assassinations of JFK (and the Warren Commission fraud), MLK and RFK and many other topics, I changed my mind when using my background in science and technology, I analysed the evidence.
I am quite happy to be proven wrong and forced to adjust to the evidence. I coerced myself to revisit 9-11. It was an endeavour I did not want to undertake. Taking the narrative at face value and analysing what they said led to a ‘discovery’ that real ‘science’ does not appear to support the relentless mainstream-contention that the planes themselves caused the destruction of the Twin Towers.
Yes planes did hit two of the three Towers, but the planes were likely a diversion and a cover. The Muslim Jihad was a very clever and practical proxy for the attack. The pretext to endless wage war in the Middle East and beyond was established by 9-11 with all the unforeseen consequences and destruction, including mass, unfettered ‘migration’. Cui bono?
3 Towers not 2
Most people will cite that the Twin Towers, South and North, were the only structures felled on 9-11-2001. The South Tower was the first to collapse at 9:59 am and the North Tower imploded at 10:28 am. However, WTC 7 or The Saloman Brothers building, also collapsed onto its own footprint, vaporised at 17:20 pm. Yet BBC ‘reporter’ Jane Stanley stood in front of an intact WTC 7 at 16:57 pm stating that the building had collapsed, some 23 minutes before it actually did fall. No planes or objects had battered WTC 7. It simply collapsed into itself in a controlled demolition.
How would Stanley know that the building would collapse 23 minutes before it did?
The narrative explanation about WTC 7, expressed by John Kerry (Secretary of State from 2013-2017) and the mainstream media, was that WTC-7 was a controlled demolition to save other buildings. They maintained that WTC-7 was weakened and presented a danger to other buildings. This explanation does not make sense.
WTC 7 suffered minor damage from the debris ejected by the collapse of the South and North Towers. Very modest fires were evident in WTC7. The 47 storey building was not tottering, nor gravely weakened. There is no evidence to warrant its controlled demolition on September 11th.
Let’s use some common sense. If a demolition was needed it would logically have been enacted after September 11th given the absolute chaos of that day. Further, it would take days, not 4-6 hours to wire a 47-storey building for a controlled implosion. Remarkably, unlike ‘normal’ controlled demolitions, WTC building 7, as witnessed with the North and South Towers, was vaporised into dust.
The standard explanation for WTC 7’s demise is therefore not credible. Reflected in that light, let’s have a wander over to the Twin Towers.
Towers and Jet fuel
Let’s begin with the planes. Commercial jetliners are flimsy objects. They must be ‘light’ enough to fly. They are not flying ‘missiles’ in form or function. Jetliners are not recommended to go above 500 mph below a certain altitude, or they will disintegrate. The planes which impacted the Twin Towers were therefore not travelling at a high enough velocity to bring down a 110 floor building.
These planes were indeed carrying jet fuel. But jet fuel cannot melt reinforced steel. It is mendacious to state that jet fuel gushing from an airplane hitting a building, can melt dense, structured steel upon impact. This claim defies physics and common sense.
The narrative intones that you only need to ‘weaken’ the structure and that was the role played by the planes and their jet fuel as they combusted into the top of the Tower. In reality however, that is not what we see. We see a complete, total and instantaneous collapse, floor by floor. The structure was not weakened, it was destroyed, with all materials being melted from top to bottom. Jet fuel could never accomplish such a feat.
The narrative is at odds with our lying eyes.
Example: Here we have a 381 foot tower block in Germany being demolished in a controlled explosion. Look familiar?
The implosion of the Twin Towers looks reamarkably similar to the controlled demoliton of the 381 foot tower in Germany, with the exception of a the mushroom cloud in the aftermath.
If a plane hits the top of a steel structure, or even its middle, you would expect the impacted part of the building to be destroyed along with the plane itself. The plane would be annihilated by the mammoth steel structure supporting the building, and large parts of the plane would strike the floors below or fall to the ground. The building itself would shudder, shake and some floors beneath the impact zone would be eviscerated, but the structure in-toto would not collapse floor by floor. Yet this is precisely what we see: a floor-by-floor implosion from the top on down.
Something is therefore very wrong with the official story. The National institute for Science and Technology (NIST) agrees. They penned a study which categorically states that the Twin Towers were demolished from the inside. NIST is one of the most credible technology groups on this globe. Many of us in IT use NIST as the best-practices standard. If NIST is saying that the buildings were demolitioned from the inside, it is wise to listen.
Narrative Inconsistencies
Even if I ignore NIST, there are many ‘anomalies’ with the official declarations of what happened. We can list some obvious ones:
All 3 towers were vaporised to dust. Each tower contained about 200.000 tonnes of structural steel, with 12 different grades of steel type and thickness. How could 200.000 tonnes of steel, thick, well-formed and dense, be evaporated from top to bottom by a jet-liner impact near the apogee of the structure?
Based on controlled demolition experience, only a nuclear device or a direct energy weapon, could vanish a building of such mass and material.
No debris including desks, toilets, computers or other artefacts were found in the wreckage, which is precisely what you would expect to find if a plane crashed into a building and caused the structure to ‘implode’. However, everything was vaporised.
Dust samples collected by the US Geological Survey right after the attacks, contained uranium, strontium and barium, which indicates that a nuclear device was used to destroy the structures.
Molten metal, steel and melted rock were found underneath the rubble. Jet fuel cannot cause metal, steel and rock to melt.
Fires burned for weeks if not months within the destroyed structures, proving that the inferno was of such force and magnitude that jet fuel as a causal agent is simply unreasonable.
Seismographs at Columbia University Earth Observatory in Palisades New York recorded two massive explosions before the South and North Towers collapsed.
The buildings had an ‘inner tube’ and ‘outer tube’ design, meaning that a nuclear or similar detonation in the basement could be channelled with full force upwards through the inner tube and cause the external tube to blow from the top down, which is indeed what we see (image at the top of this post).
All 3 towers had insurance policies owned by Larry Silverstein a Jewish billionaire and well connected with the powers that be. Silverstein collected U$3.5 billion as an insurance payout. These insurance payouts would have gifted Silverstein a net profit from his WTC investments of at least U$500 million.
[There seems to be yet another Jewish-Israeli connection in all of this, an Epstein-like rabbit hole].
Various cancers have occurred at an above average rate for the 9-11 first responders, another obvious indication that radioactive material was present.
We have 3,000 or more engineers, many with PhD’s, who have signed a statement saying that all 3 buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Only the CIA and US government could carry out such an act.
The above points are rather incontrovertible and solid. Let’s add another.
Nano-thermite nuclear fuel traces were found in the dust of 9-11. Nano-thermite is a radioactive ignition, used in nuclear explosions. The US military has thermobaric nuclear devices which utilise nano-thermite. Nano-thermite will melt steel, metal and rock.
Why is nano-thermite present at the 9-11 sites? Why do mushroom clouds push upwards from the Twin Towers, when controlled demolitions force all objects and their masses downwards?
Let’s pause and think about this.
How did a flimsy, light, commercial airliner, flying at less than 500 mph, smash into a massive 200.000 tonne steel-structure, and cause such devastation? Why was WTC-7 destroyed in a controlled demolition some 7 hours after the North Tower collapsed onto its own footprint, imitating in every detail the floor-by-floor collapse of both the North and South Towers? How were all 3 buildings evaporated into dust? Why the traces of nuclear material? What is the Silverstein connection? Does any of the official narrative make any sense? Even The History Channel is puzzled.
Mr Anderson
Then we have Neo and his passport in the film ‘The Matrix’ distributed in 1999. Neo’s passport shows September 11, 2001 as the expiry date. Whistleblowers and all that. The Corona plandemic, another CIA project, took years of planning. If 9-11 was a CIA project, it also would have taken years to plan.
The Pentagon
Let’s proceed to the Pentagon where supposedly a plane crashed through many perimeters and destroyed part of the northern section of the building. The Pentagon is a fortress and ringed by defences. Are we to believe that the US military and its HQ is so incompetent it could not or would not shoot down an incoming attacker? There is no evidence whatsoever that the US military ‘responded’ to the ‘plane’ which rammed into the northern part of the Pentagon. How odd. The only real explanation is that they allowed the plane or missile to hit the building.
(FBI photos released through their ‘news’ allies)
The narrative is that AA Flight 77 crashed into the Pentagon and that there is ample evidence of plane wreckage. Yet the photos and videos released are sparse and could be digitised. The photos don’t prove much, you can crash a plane anywhere and move the ‘evidence’ to a new site. AA Flight 77 did indeed go down, but where?
There were more than 80 cameras around the Pentagon yet only a few stilted frames were released, none of them showing a plane impacting the building. Later ‘evidence’ includes computer generated images but we need the primary sources. Nothing cries out ‘truth’ and ‘honesty’ more than hiding the primary evidence and data.
A Major General stated he had proof a missile hit the Pentagon. The gaping hole in the image below certainly gives credence to the claim. What made this hole?
Others claim that the invasion of Afghanistan was already planned and scheduled for October 2001 (oil pipeline dispute). Retired military officer Karen Kwiatowski, who lived one mile from the Pentagon, wrote that there was no evidence of a plane crashing into the Pentagon. Donald Rumsfeld one of the most corrupt Defence Secretary’s in history, agreed with her, stating a missile hit the Pentagon.
Writing in “9/11 and American Empire: Intellectuals Speak Out,” Kwiatowski noted, “a strange absence of airliner debris, there was no sign of the kind of damage to the Pentagon structure one would expect from the impact of a large airliner. This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense, who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a ‘missile’.”
So what happened?
Using common sense, we can surmise that what struck the Pentagon was likely a missile fired by the US military through the perimeters into the building. This missile was aimed at the northern section of the Pentagon where an audit on $2.3 Trillion or so of missing public assets, was in flight. Before 9-11 this was the big news of the day, the endless corruption, graft and theft of money by actors within and external to the Pentagon. Funny that. The files and evidence for this audit were miraculously destroyed by the missile. Convenient that. As of 2024, the Pentagon has never passed an ‘audit’. Surprising that.
Would the CIA and the US government kill 186 people on AA Flight 77 to deflect attention from an audit, or to use as a casus belli for war in Afghanistan? Well, let me consider that. Assassinations of JFK and RFK? Gulf of Tonkin? WMD and Iraq? Human emitted plant food causes ‘climate’? The current NATO initiated Uketopian-Russian war? Snowden and Assange? Americans landing on the moon with 1960s technology? Flying bat viruses and the safe and effective mRNA stabbinations? Fauci as your Lord and Saviour?
“9-11 continues to be not only the greatest crime in American history, but also the most strenuously covered up.” Peter Dale Scott, former Canadian diplomat
9-11 initiated the ‘War on Terror’ which has now consumed 21 years, trillions of dollars and millions of dead and wounded. The military and pharmaceutical industries are close allies of the CIA. Together this ensemble, along with the Department of Defence, rule the US. When analysing an event of such magnitude we must consider this reality. Cui bono from 9-11?
We will never know exactly what brought down the 3 towers on 9-11 or what happened at the Pentagon. It does appears obvious however, that a thermonuclear device or something similar, was detonated inside all 3 Tower buildings causing them to collapse, completely vaporising the structures. It is probable that a missile was fired into the Pentagon.
It might also have been a combination of explosions and technology. Perhaps more than one explosive was wired inside each building. Possibly a direct energy weapon or (DEW) which devastated Maui, might also have been used within the Towers or external to the buildings. Maybe a cruise missile along with other detonations savaged the Pentagon. Maybe the CIA remotely controlled the planes, flying them like missiles into the WTC buildings and the Pentagon; with the planes carrying small nuclear weapons or some other technology unknown to the hoi polloi. We will never know.
The CIA
Once you parse and weigh the evidence, it is highly likely that 9-11 was one of the greatest crimes in history. As I mentioned above, for a long time I was in the ‘narrative’ camp and openly lampooned and vilified ‘9-11 Truthers’. In the main these people have been right, maybe not in every detail, but in their overall declaration that 9-11 was an inside job, organised by the CIA and its partners in the Pentagon and the Department of Defence.
CIA projects always have many layers and misdirections. They are hard to untangle and nearly impossible to link back to their progenitors in the club that run the US. The assassinations of JFK and RFK by the CIA is a great example of this claim and illustrates the intricate complexity that hides and protects CIA operations (I would urge everyone to read, The Devil’s Chessboard by David Talbot).
For the record, I also firmly believe that only the CIA and the US Department of Defence have the power, the money, the reach and the immorality to plan, implement and enforce a global medical Nazism such as the Corona SARS II scamdemic. The same is true for an operation as multi-layered and intricate as 9-11. So here we have 9-11 and Corona, the Twin Towers of modern deceit and despotism, icons to the savagery and satanic evil of the US government and its agencies. Innocents murdered to further the agenda of the New World Order.
‘Science’ and its endless lies
We are informed daily that the US and the ‘West’ are the ‘good guys’, the ‘moral characters’ defending ‘freedom’ and ‘civilisation’. We must follow their ‘science’ and their ‘evidence’. We hear these declarations in every domain: 9-11, Corona, the moon landing, vaccines, ‘climate’, even the US proxy war against Russia in the Ukraine, a war started by NATO with over 20 years of coups, instigations and planning. We are to believe that after 3 years of an enforced Medical Nazism with all the lies that were spewed, that somehow our governments want to ‘help us’ and that their ‘science’ is the only ‘truth’ and the only path to salvation.
Given the unrelenting mendacity from ‘the science’ and the government-media complex a sane person can make a facile conclusion.
None of the counterfactual, puerile declarations emanating from Western governments, their ‘science’, or their media slaves, are true on any topic, of any importance.
The CIA-DoD complex, ‘science’ and Western institutions in general, have revealed themselves to be incomprehensibly false, totalitarian, corrupt, craven, evil and atavistic. We are now on the wrong side of history.
Back to Churchill and updating his 1916 observation about truth:
“Truth is incontrovertible. The Establishment may resent it, ‘The Science’ may deride it, ‘Media Disinformation’ may distort it, but there it is.”
Whatever ‘they’ say, the opposite is true. 9-11 likely follows that simple truism.
==
