Maurice Allais and the 'Paraconical Pendulum' which proves the Aether and disproves Foucault, Newton, Einstein and Gravity as a constant.

Allais' Pendulum is catastrophic for 'The Science'. It has been replicated countless times in different environments. It confirms and measures an aetheric wind. Rage on Fanboys.

A creature of the Rothschilds, a Zionist and a Druid. Anyone can make up models and nonsense and then map proofs post-algorithm to the equation. Einstein produced no experiments to confirm his gibberish. None ever have.

Authority and Leviathan

In the last post we discussed how French engineers and naturalists recovered and proved the wave theory of light within an aether. This is not an accident. Using the power and soapbox of the Royal Society Saint Newton of the Light Corpuscle and Gravity in the early 18^th century, used his position as President of this body to crush opposition. He imposed the non-science of a ‘vacuum’ with light as billiard ball particles which resembled his view of the universe.

Newton’s models took precedence in all scientific domains. Anyone proposing an aether which annihilated Newton’s maths, or a wave theory of light which destroyed his billiard-ball prototype, was buried and professionally erased.

The modus operandi of using institutional authority to eviscerate dissent was replicated and has been imitated in every society since that time. It is with Newton that ‘Science’ becomes cojoined with ‘the State’. Today to criticise ‘The Science’ is to be a disloyal subject, a wayward Sheeple. In Newton’s reign, to criticise the ‘vacuum’, or ‘light corpuscles’ was to be ‘anti-science’. This might ring familiar to critics of government and ‘The Science’.

From the time of Newton onwards, it has not been uncommon for dissenters to be ‘de-lifed’, many have not only been financially and professionally destroyed, deregistered or censored, but physically attacked and killed. Newton personally sought to erase any physical legacy of his rivals including Robert Hooke, Christian Huygens and Gottfried Leibniz. He built the playbook to silence the malcontents.

We therefore witness a long history of Scientism. Cults which are as religious as ‘The Science’ do not engage in debate, transparency, mercy or tolerance. They don’t suffer heretics.

Allais and Aetheric Antinomies

The proofs for an aether are quite obvious. We can start with taking a walk outside our door in the open air. Allais’ achievement is overwhelming and virtually unknown (see Munier 2010, on the suppression of Allais). It does not comport with Scientism or its underlying philosophy.

Maurice Allais (1911–2010) was a practical French physicist-engineer of the mid-20^th century. An independent, critical thinker, Allais the mechanical savant, devised a proof of the aether that the cult of Scientism has never been able to explain away. His skill and capability match those of Georges Sagnac, Dayton Miller, Carl Anderson, Herbert Ives and many others who demonstrated the existence of an aether, practical engineers who are unknown to most PhD’s in Physics.

In 1954 the Nobel laureate and polymath Allais observed that during a solar eclipse his ‘paraconical pendulum’ would change its behaviour. This is important and we will get to why this observation is so paradigm-shattering. The ‘paraconical pendulum’ was a specialized version of the Foucault pendulum in Paris.

Heliocentricity and Theoretical Proofs (part four). Doesn’t the Foucault Pendulum Prove the Earth is Rotating?

We discussed Foucault’s pendulum and why it has no relationship to heliocentric ‘proof’ given it was trying to derive this planet’s rotation, and even in attempting that, it failed. Foucault’s Pendulum is a sacred relic of Scientism, used to provide a visual ‘proof’ of the Earth’s rotation.

In reality Foucault’s machine was always mechanically forced. We know it is another fraud of Scientism because it was exposed by Maurice Allais who built the ‘Paraconical Pendulum’, which revealed the poverty of cosmological mechanisation theology, or the ‘clockwork’ methodology of Newton’s deism (Jeverdan et al, 1981).

Let’s have a look at both Foucault and Allais.

Foucault’s penduluma at the Pantheon in Paris. A Temple of Scientism.

Foucault’s Pendulum vs the Paraconical Pendulum

Imagine you take the family to France. To be sciency you are in Paris and visit the Panthéon museum. The thrill of acquiring another ‘science’ bona fide is only surpassed by the awe of Foucault’s (the college dropout with no training in physics or maths), magical pendulum machine, which used a 60 m cable. The children are impressed and ask, ‘Daddy what is that thing?’

You put on the master’s face. You point to the contraption. You intone to the children, hand waving in the direction of the marvel:

‘Dear children, here we have proof and a mid-19^th century confirmation of the rotating globe. The Pendulum swings, and the Earth rotates underneath it. We stand here before more evidence of the greatness and science of our civilisation. This erases the sterility of the Dark Ages, and is indicative of our own Age of Light and Science. Behold my children, the genius of man who has discovered that he merely inhabits a small, unremarkable rock which rotates and moves around the Sun’.

A heavenly choir erupts in song. The children stare at you in awe beguiled by your panagyric wisdom. Your clothes turn white. Everyone collapses in front of the pendulum in prayer and homage.

Or maybe not. Back in reality what these exhibits of Foucault’s very contrived pendulum don’t tell you is the following:

• 1. The pendulums seen in museums (like the Panthéon) are not pure mechanical systems.

• 2. A simple pendulum will eventually stop due to air resistance and friction. This is called the ‘aether’ denied by ‘The Science’.

• 3. To keep the pendulum swinging for the public, museums use electromagnetic rings at the top to ‘boost’ the cable.

• 4. This ensures the pendulum follows the predicted ‘Coriolis’ path (another word for the aether). If left alone, the pendulum often behaves irregularly, drifting in ways that contradict the Earth-rotation script.

• 5. The script says that the Earth rotates ‘under the pendulum’ in a regular way. This is easily disproven when you let the pendulum swing unaided for any length of time, or if you measure the angle displacement against celestial phenomena like an eclipse.

No one is told this of course. The author does not have an emotional investment in either a rotating, or non-rotating Earth. The evidence is more clearly on the side of non-rotational. This evidence is suppressed and rarely discussed. The author deems it appropriate to discuss non-rotational evidence. The best argument for a rotating Earth is the generation of electro-magnetic energy. However, a non-rotational Earth could generate the same (future post).

So, what did the very capable Monsieur Allais do?

Mathigicians: The Earth's apparent Rotation, Earthquakes and the impossibility of long ages.

Allez with Allais!

Allais did not use a 60-meter cable; he used a short, 1 metre, ‘Paraconical Pendulum’ supported by a ball bearing. This allowed the pendulum to move not just in a circle, but to wobble and move based on the actual local density of the medium or aether. Unlike Foucault’s apparatus this was natural, ‘free flowing’ and would be subject to normal conditions.

Adaptation of Allais’ experiment. Link

Allais was very careful in his experiments, comprehensive and transparent with notes and observations. In 1954 and 1959, during solar eclipses, Allais recorded that his pendulum suddenly changed its direction of rotation by 13.5 degrees. This is an enormous degree shift, which the practitioners of Foucault’s rather fraudulent pendulum have never documented nor even considered to test.

Allais’ detected shift happened exactly when the Moon shielded the Earth from the Sun’s aetheric flow (an eclipse). It proved that gravity is not a curvature of space but a mechanical pressure from the medium or aether, that can be blocked or shadowed. Many posts on here have argued this point.

Allais disproved Foucault, Newton, Minkowski and Einstein. He performed his experiment in many environments over 40 years, always getting the same results (Allais, 1997).

What does it mean?

1. Allais’ experiment has been replicated over 20 times by other practictioners (Duif, 2004) and is accurate in any environment. This means that Foucault’s pendulum has nothing to do with a rotating Earth.

2. Allais et al have proven that the Earth is not a lone ball spinning in a ‘vacuum’. It is an active cosmic actor submerged in a dynamic aether that reacts to the positions of the Sun and Moon.

3. It destroys the narrative. Despite his Nobel Prize Allais’ physics work was labelled ‘impossible’ because it broke the Einsteinian-Newtonian script which forbids a medium (aether) from affecting mechanical experiments. Allais, the maverick Frenchman, was buried by the Anglo-American gatekeepers.

Unfortunately for Scientism, Allais’ results have been replicated by many teams. When NASA tried to disprove it in 2003 their data fraud was discovered and their experiment was deemed ‘inconclusive’. As with the UK’s ‘Royal Society’ real science can still flourish outside the CIA-NASA complex which crushes dissent, just as Newton’s Royal Society did starting in the early 18^th century.

Chud, what does Grok, Teacher Quack Quack say?

Even though the Allais Effect has been replicated literally dozens of times it remains a fringe topic in university textbooks. It is almost never discussed. It is vilified by the usual array of AI, digital and print gatekeepers. The Quacks of Scientism offer their standard ‘contamination’ defense and of course, yet more maths which ‘amend Relativity’ its sacred screed:

• Scientism claims the ‘Allais’ shift is caused by the contamination of ‘air movement’ or ‘temperature changes’ during the eclipse.

  • What is ‘air’ but part of the aether? Why would ‘temperature’ impact a machine on this planet’s surface and cause it to be deranged by 13.5 degrees? Absurd.

  • The Allais effect has been observed in vacuum-sealed chambers and deep underground mines. It is a fundamental shift in the mechanical weight of the object. This has nothing to do with the nonsense of ‘Relativity, ‘the air’ or ‘temperature’.

  • Allais disproves the constant value of G or Gravity. Gravity, as this Substack as argued, is a property of an energy attraction through the aether and is entirely dynamic, not static.

You are never told that the pendulum’s on display in various museums which ‘prove the Earth’s rotation’ use a ‘booster’ ring and electrical power to keep the pendulum swinging for the wide-eyed, open-mouthed public. In reality, without this extraneous energy, the pendulum would stop swinging and display erratic behaviour. Can’t have that now can we.

Romanian Reordering

While Maurice Allais discovered the anomaly, it was the Romanian physicists Olenici and Popescu who refined the observations to show exactly what is moving. The Romanians proved that if the Earth was a ball spinning in a ‘vacuum’, a solar eclipse would be a distant shadow with no mechanical influence on local inertia (Olenici, D. and Popescu, V. 2012).

The Allais-Olenici-Popescu experiments show that the eclipse creates an aetheric-wake or ripple, proving the Earth is the stationary observer within a flowing medium.

Heads exploding, paradigms imploding.

The Romanians did not look for a ‘jump’ in the pendulum; they looked at the Phase Shift of the aetheric tide.

• Observed: They discovered that the paraconical pendulum begins to react before the optical eclipse begins and continues after it ends. This time-series data proves that Allais was right and it makes perfect physical-mechanical sense.

• Mechanics: The ‘phase shift’ is a ‘Bow Wave’ effect (or a wake). Just as a ship moving through water creates a wake that reaches the shore before the ship does, the Moon moving through the aether creates a pressure wave that hits the Earth ahead of the visual shadow. There is nothing in nature or science to refute this. This means that ‘space’ is a medium that operates according to the physics of fluid dynamics.

• Stationary? If the Earth were rotating at 1,000 mph while orbiting at 67,000 mph, the chaotic vectors of that motion would ‘wash out’ the precise, localized wake of the eclipse. The fact that the wake is orderly and directly tied to the Sun-Moon alignment could indicate that the Earth is the static substrate in the experiment. There is nothing within the standard model of physics or science which refutes this observation.

The roar of the Pharisees. The rending of tunics. Walls crashing down. Fat guys on Youtube bellowing. Threats made.

Table: Battle of the Pendulums

Summary of Allais and Foucault. One is forced and does not comport to reality. The other is mechanical, replicable and completely ignored of course.

Precession recession?

The script states that Foucault pendulums ‘demonstrate’ precession because the Earth ‘turns’ and moves around the Sun and wobbles (precesses) as it does so underneath the pendulum. A more accurate definition of precession is the following.

Precession: movement in the aetheric drift of a rotating or non-rotating object (a planet). It is the physical change in the orientation of the axis of the rotating body or the plane of an oscillating one. In other words, a ‘wobble’ as the object moves due to the aetheric wind which impacts its translational movement, or its atmosphere at rest.

Popescu noticed that during certain alignments the precessionary wobble stops or reverses. If the Moon at 238.000 miles distance can stop the rotation of a pendulum on Earth, then the ground isn’t what was moving the pendulum in the first place. The aether is the motor, and the Moon is the mechanism that disengages it by interfering in the Sun-Earth ecliptic arrangement.

1. The Foucault-Quack Script

   1. The standard model maintains that the Foucault pendulum swings in a fixed line while the Earth turns beneath it. In this script or narrative, the Earth’s precession or wobble, is an illusion caused by the observer’s motion (back to the fraud of Relativity and moving the Observer around).

2. Allais’ Observations

   1. A paraconical pendulum proves that the precession rate is not constant. The precession or wobbling movement, speeds up, slows down, and even reverses during eclipses.

3. Mechanical reality

   1. If the Earth’s rotation were the only cause of the wobble, the precession would be steady and invariant. The fact that it wobbles proves the pendulum is reacting to a variable medium (the aether) that is being rippled, impacted and stirred by the Moon and Sun.

   2. This is proven by fluid dynamics. Genesis page 1 describes fluid dynamics in the aether. Modern science is having a hard time catching up.

Scientism’s claim that the Earth’s axis ‘wobbles’ like a top over a ‘26,000-year cycle’ in a ‘vacuum’ is just more conjectural apocrypha. It is another quack theory.

Wobbly Scientism

The standard model clams that our planet’s ‘cycle of wobble’ is caused by the ‘pull’ of the much smaller Moon on the Earth’s equatorial bulge. Mechanically this is unproven and unlikely. You can take 2 objects, one which is 81 times the weight of the other and see for yourself. The smaller object will not cause a ‘bulge’ along the equator of the larger object.

Equation

• Mass of the Earth x R of the Earth (barycentre distance) = Mass of the Moon x R of the Moon

• If you rearrange this you can find the ratio of the masses (Mass of the Earth / Mass of the Moon)

• R or Barycentre of the Moon is the distance from the Moon to the ‘weighted’ centre between the Moon and Earth and this is around 379.000 Km.

• R or Barycentre of the Earth is the distance from the Earth to the ‘weighted’ centre between the Moon and Earth and this is around 4.600 Km.

If we take 379,700 and divide by 4,670 we have 81.

Using basic physics we know that the Earth is 81 times the ‘mass’ of the Moon

Take a high-density lead sphere (representing the Earth) and rotate a smaller marble (the Moon) around it in a vacuum-chamber, no deformation occurs

The Earth’s bulge is permanent and symmetrical, it is not variable

If the Moon caused the bulge it would follow the Moon, but it does not and the bulge stays at the Equator because it is the mechanical equilibrium of a rotating body in a medium

Another narrative in Scientism ‘debunked’.

Fluid Dynamics and a Non-Rotating Earth?

What is mechanically known is the reality of the aetheric wind in the solar system, through which the planets travel. The entire constellation of this system rotates around a centre of mass (our planet), in a fluid or solid, causing a shift to the ‘fixed stars’. This means that the bulge in our planet occurs because of the aetheric impact and alignment of this planet to the Sun and Moon. This is what the evidence and observations reveal (Wang et al, 2000) and what Allais proved.

The aether is dynamic and so is gravity. Aether Cosmology on the Foucault fraud. Link.

Gyrating Scopes

We have discussed the gyroscope. You can prove the above assertion with a simple desk gyroscope.

1. Take a gyroscope. Spin it and point the top of its axis to the ‘North’.

2. The top never falls.

3. Now move the top of the axis to the ‘East’ or ‘West’ depending on how it is spinning.

4. When you apply such a force the resulting motion must occur 90 degrees later in the direction of the rotation. In other words, the gyro will wobble.

5. This is the aether. When you apply that change and pressure to cause the wobble to the gyro, you have to imagine the same occurring in the medium of space. This is the Coriolis.

6. The aether-Coriolis-medium acts like a thick fluid, the spinning object is hooked into this medium, and any attempt to tilt it will result in the circular wobble.

7. Newton and the quackery of the standard model call the Coriolis a ‘fictitious force’. There is nothing fictional about it.

   1. The Coriolis is the inertia of the medium reacting to movement: Huygens’ and Descartes’ ‘vortices’ in space (a fluid aether).

   2. Since the standard model cannot tolerate an ‘aether’ given that it destroys their maths, they label it as ‘Coriolis’. Why are you surprised?

Coriolis Force, Newton's physics and Geo-centricity. Absent in 'modern science'.

To make it more difficult for the narrative, Georges Sagnac in 1913 proved that this ‘wobble’ exists within light itself. Georges found that a light beam traveling with the rotation of a large gyroscope (light interferometer machine), arrived at a different time than the beam traveling against it. Welcome to the aether.

You can disprove the standard model and Foucault’s pendulum anywhere. But this is never taught. Better to imbibe, regurgitate, pray.

Bottom Line

A Stationary Earth? The ball does not rotate? Space is not a ‘vacuum’? Einstein and Newton part of the Scientistic quackery? Come on Chud! In the next post we will discuss the aether proof and a translational non-stationary Earth, regardless of rotation.

Even if the Earth does rotate (which Foucault never proved), Sagnac, Allais, the Romanians and many others have confirmed the existence of the aether. They are not American. They are not British. They rarely make an entrance into the gospel texts and books. There is an inherent paradigm bias in all current standard models.

What we are saying based on mechanical evidence is pretty plain. The aether exists and this entails:

1. The Earth is the center of the pressure field within our Solar system. Physically and mechanically, this must be a unique location in a protected zone and hollow, utterly without imitation anywhere in the known universe.

2. When the Moon and Sun align, they are essentially ‘throttling’ the engine and energy of the universe and our Solar System, affecting this planet in its protected zone. The aetheric wind is impacted and we feel it and can measure it.

3. If the Earth were a tiny unprotected, insignificant speck flying through a ‘vacuum’, this alignment (an eclipse), would have no more mechanical effect on a pendulum sitting in Paris, than a fly passing a freight train. The standard model is now hung on its own petard.

4. The fact that the pendulum ‘feels’ the Moon proves that we are submerged in a mechanical medium. Further, it can be logically and observationally suggested that this medium must be moving around the Earth. This planet receives and feels the energy and ‘wind’ from this medium (see Miller, Sagnac, Ives on this substack).

5. Gravity is therefore a dynamic energy moving through a medium and can never be a static constant nor for that matter a ridiculous space-time merged dimension (Munera, 2002).

6. The above mechanical facts, proven by fluid dynamics, destroys Newtonian-Einsteinian theory, the Big Bang and most of ‘modern’ physics.

Allais et al provided yet another disproof of everything we are told to believe in. In the next post we will discuss an opposite view within the aether reality (a translational movement). The exact aether model can be disputed based on evidence. However, the main point is that wherever you look standard physics is wrong.

But you know this already! You went to the best state schools and were told this is the age of reason, logic and following ‘the science’. All of these points were earnestly offered and debated.

Or maybe not.

All hail.

Next post; how Consoli confirmed the aether - another physicist no one has heard about.

==NB

Very apposite question from a reader on how the Allais device worked. Answer is pasted here for clarity.

Good question. Allais’ machine is a real pendulum, Foucault’s, the theology college failure, is not. I probably should have added this to the original post:

1- The ‘wiring’ is necessarsy - it is connected to light sensors (gates) at the base. When the pendulum swings it passes a signal. Otherwise you cannot measure the signals or changes with any precision.

2-There is a ‘chronograph’ or recorder. When we send signals we have to log them. This allowed Allais to measure the precession or wobble (swing rotation). This means he was not relying like Foucault on his eye (Foucault lied of course and it is impossible to reproduce what he said he ‘saw’, we therefore need to automate and abstract that process to make it objective).

3-Later on the Italian added wiring for thermal sensors. He did this to control the ‘heat effect’, which the Apostles usually shout about (another magic word). The aether is sensitive to temp induced density changes in the air, and the room equipment was monitored to account for such an affect.

4-His experiments were also what he called, ‘short-burst audits’. The old boy would start the pendulum by hand (using a silk thread burn-off for a clean release) and record it for only a few hours at a time, specifically during eclipses. He never used a motor, because he was not making a propaganda display. He was simply trying to catch the mechanical anomaly in the aether medium.

I should probably include these steps in the article, so you asked a very relevant question and thanks for that. Hopefully this helps.

===

The Aether disproves Relativity. Einstein's obfuscation and confusion around the Aether.

Sources

Allais, Maurice (1997) L’Anisotropie de l’Espace (The Anisotropy of Space) (40 years of pendulum data proving space is not a vacuum)

Duif, Chris P. (2004) A Review of the Allais Effect (arXiv:gr-qc/0208065) (A modern forensic review of the 20+ successful replications of the eclipse anomaly)

Jeverdan, G.T., Rusu, G.I. and Antonescu, V.I. (1981). ‘Experiments using the Foucault pendulum during the solar eclipse of 15 February, 1961’, Bibl. Astronomica, 56, pp. 47-51. (The primary confirmation that the Moon physically alters pendulum behaviour).

Munera, H.A. (2002). ‘The Effect of Solar Eclipses on the Period of a Torsion Pendulum’, Apeiron, 9(2), pp. 66–82. (A rigorous mechanical audit showing that gravity is a dynamic field, not a static constant).

Munier, Roger (2010) Maurice Allais et la Physique (Clément Juglar) (A technical biography detailing the suppression of Allais’ aetheric findings)

Olenici, D. and Popescu, V. (2012). ‘Study of the Allais Effect during the Total Solar Eclipse of 11 July 2010’, International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2(4). (Modern proof that the aetheric shadow is reproducible with 21st-century equipment).

Sagnac, Georges (1913) L’éther lumineux démontré par l’effet du vent relatif d’éther (The Sagnac Effect: Proved light speed varies with rotation in the medium)

Wang, Q.A. et al. (2000). ‘Precise measurement of gravity variations during a total solar eclipse’, Physical Review D, 62(4). (A Scientism journal that was forced to publish the anomaly because the data from the gravimeters was too precise to ignore).