Summarises various posts. Induces Fanboy rage and apoplexy. Attracts ad hominems and allegations of Flat Earthism. Chance that Apollo 11 went to the moon, landed and came back as advertised - 1.8%.
Coming this summer, relive the totally straightforward story of how a 1960s government agency defeated gravity, radiation, fuel limits, materials science, and basic arithmetic, all before lunch ๐ฐ๏ธ๐
Witness the mighty Saturn V, a 3,000-tonne candle that somehow hurled a 21-tonne spacecraft to the Moon using kerosene and confidence โฝ๐ Physics professors today say it canโt be done, which only proves how much better physics used to be ๐โจ
Marvel as engineers calculate escape velocity with slide rules, chalk dust, and vibes ๐๐งฎ๐ While modern rockets need multiple orbital refuels, Apollo packed light, because excess fuel is just fear in liquid form ๐ข๏ธ๐๐ฆ
Feel the thrill of launch as astronauts endure bone-crushing G-forces without a single documented organ complaint ๐งโ๐๐ฅ๐ซ๐ The rocket rattles violently, but donโt worry, thatโs just freedom shaking itself loose ๐๐ข๐บ๐ธ๐ฆ
Experience the miracle of heat and friction as an aluminum capsule cruises through plasma hotter than lava, yet remains cozy inside ๐ฅ๐ก๏ธโ๏ธ๐งฃโ Thanks to a heat shield that chars heroically and then politely stops heat from doing heat things ๐๐ก๏ธ
Travel through the Van Allen radiation belts with no measurable harm, because the crew passed through quickly โข๏ธ๐ขโฉ Radiation, as we all know, respects schedules โ๐
Be amazed by the onboard computer, running on less memory than a modern toaster, flawlessly navigating EarthโMoon dynamics, orbital rendezvous, and pinpoint landings ๐พ๐คฏ๐๐โก๏ธ๐๐ค๐ฏ Because when software is primitive, human calm fills the RAM ๐งโโ๏ธโจ
Touch down on the Moon in the Lunar Module, a delicate origami hut powered by hope and a lawn-equipment engine ๐ช๐๐ฅ๐ No unmanned test landing, no backup vehicle, just one take, baby ๐ฌ๐
Enjoy live television from a quarter-million miles away in stunning clarity, a feat never repeated, while todayโs streaming buffers at 12 feet ๐ก๐บ๐๐ค Progress!
Relive the priceless data, telemetry tapes, original footage, and engineering records, lovingly preserved byโฆ taping over them ๐โจ๐ผ๐คทโโ๏ธ Because when something works perfectly, you donโt need receipts ๐งพโ
And finally, ask yourself the ultimate question ๐ค
Good one - 'NASA-Flix', that is inspired :) Yes so easy in 1969, but 'Orion' won't be carrying a moon lander if it ever takes off....too difficult, too much weight, requires more rocketry and fuel...etc.
Can search the embedded table, their story relies on the magic of the S Transponder - which was powered by 20 watts. If you look in your house you won't find a light bulb below 40w. I have used an S Transponder replica and they claim it was the 'walkie talkie' on the LEM and CM. It would never function across frequencies, Khz to Ghz, nor across networks or multiplexing from 'space'.
Nixon's phone is also addressed - a Bell landline patched to a wireless frequency patching a Hz frequency to Ghz - this would never work in 1969 and if it did would result in noise, latency and drops. They talk to each other as if they were in the same room.
Did this Saturn V rocket get to the Moon? Based on these experimental results, it must be concluded that such a slow rocket most likely ended up in the waters of the Atlantic. Moreover, it carried no space craft, and had no astronauts aboard.
Of all the discrepancies, the photographs are the least compelling to me. Many things about them scream "fake!", but it provides the fanboys with endless trivial points to argue and distract. There are far greater absurdities in the fundamental physics, which the fanboys can only attempt to deboonk with pseudoscience pilpul.
Yes indeed. The S transponder is a beauty. Apparently in 1969 with analogue tech they had the ability to mulitplex rich data, transfer it from khz to Ghz over a wireless spectrum, feed it into a receiver 240 K miles away, transfer that over a coaxial cable to an IBM mainframe to process in real time and feed the control room :) Sure they did. Fanboys never discuss such things. They argue over shadows. As you said the photos are obvious fakes but so much else is wrong.
I love a bit of fanboy rage. Quite frequently go on their silly YouTube space video channels and wind them up. I guess that makes me a troll as well as a flat Earther conspiracy theorist. Oh well.
Good for you. It is impossible to understand why or how someone becomes so emotionally invested in 'NASA' and the CIA. The blind trust and defense of the ridiculous is frightening.
Thanks Eddie, I will create a real database - also for physics in general (huge frauds, nonsense in every domain). I need to schedule and book time to create a real db to provide material, critiques, mapped to sources and links as well.
NASA-FLIX MINI-DOC,
๐๐ฌ We Went to the Moon โ Honest! ๐โจ
Coming this summer, relive the totally straightforward story of how a 1960s government agency defeated gravity, radiation, fuel limits, materials science, and basic arithmetic, all before lunch ๐ฐ๏ธ๐
Witness the mighty Saturn V, a 3,000-tonne candle that somehow hurled a 21-tonne spacecraft to the Moon using kerosene and confidence โฝ๐ Physics professors today say it canโt be done, which only proves how much better physics used to be ๐โจ
Marvel as engineers calculate escape velocity with slide rules, chalk dust, and vibes ๐๐งฎ๐ While modern rockets need multiple orbital refuels, Apollo packed light, because excess fuel is just fear in liquid form ๐ข๏ธ๐๐ฆ
Feel the thrill of launch as astronauts endure bone-crushing G-forces without a single documented organ complaint ๐งโ๐๐ฅ๐ซ๐ The rocket rattles violently, but donโt worry, thatโs just freedom shaking itself loose ๐๐ข๐บ๐ธ๐ฆ
Experience the miracle of heat and friction as an aluminum capsule cruises through plasma hotter than lava, yet remains cozy inside ๐ฅ๐ก๏ธโ๏ธ๐งฃโ Thanks to a heat shield that chars heroically and then politely stops heat from doing heat things ๐๐ก๏ธ
Travel through the Van Allen radiation belts with no measurable harm, because the crew passed through quickly โข๏ธ๐ขโฉ Radiation, as we all know, respects schedules โ๐
Be amazed by the onboard computer, running on less memory than a modern toaster, flawlessly navigating EarthโMoon dynamics, orbital rendezvous, and pinpoint landings ๐พ๐คฏ๐๐โก๏ธ๐๐ค๐ฏ Because when software is primitive, human calm fills the RAM ๐งโโ๏ธโจ
Touch down on the Moon in the Lunar Module, a delicate origami hut powered by hope and a lawn-equipment engine ๐ช๐๐ฅ๐ No unmanned test landing, no backup vehicle, just one take, baby ๐ฌ๐
Enjoy live television from a quarter-million miles away in stunning clarity, a feat never repeated, while todayโs streaming buffers at 12 feet ๐ก๐บ๐๐ค Progress!
Relive the priceless data, telemetry tapes, original footage, and engineering records, lovingly preserved byโฆ taping over them ๐โจ๐ผ๐คทโโ๏ธ Because when something works perfectly, you donโt need receipts ๐งพโ
And finally, ask yourself the ultimate question ๐ค
Why return when you already nailed it ๐
Why improve perfection ๐ฏ
Why go back at all ๐โ
Six missions,
No disasters,
No repeats,
No recreations,
Science settled ๐ฌ
Doubts deleted ๐๏ธ
History locked ๐
NASA-FLIX,
Because belief is lighter than fuel ๐ค๐
Are you still watching? ๐๐
Good one - 'NASA-Flix', that is inspired :) Yes so easy in 1969, but 'Orion' won't be carrying a moon lander if it ever takes off....too difficult, too much weight, requires more rocketry and fuel...etc.
As a photographer, I have never understood how the astronauts were able to use film cameras on the moon's surface.
Also, the exposures are perfect. But color film has little latitude.
Regarding the live video images sent from the capsule back to earth -- what sort of 1969 technology made that possible?
And what about Nixon's phone call!
Can search the embedded table, their story relies on the magic of the S Transponder - which was powered by 20 watts. If you look in your house you won't find a light bulb below 40w. I have used an S Transponder replica and they claim it was the 'walkie talkie' on the LEM and CM. It would never function across frequencies, Khz to Ghz, nor across networks or multiplexing from 'space'.
Nixon's phone is also addressed - a Bell landline patched to a wireless frequency patching a Hz frequency to Ghz - this would never work in 1969 and if it did would result in noise, latency and drops. They talk to each other as if they were in the same room.
Gurdjieff had a good expression: 'victims of a contemporary education' lol
Yes indeed, the propaganda is truly relentless. No critical thinking is allowed.
Let's start at the beginning; the rocket launch. Many articles on aulis.com suggest Saturn V never left earth's orbit.
https://www.aulis.com/apollo11saturn_v.htm
Quote
Did this Saturn V rocket get to the Moon? Based on these experimental results, it must be concluded that such a slow rocket most likely ended up in the waters of the Atlantic. Moreover, it carried no space craft, and had no astronauts aboard.
End quote
Correct, 21 tonnes payload. As the Nazi von Braun said you would need 300.000 tonnes of volume (Empire State Bldg). The Saturn V was 3.000 tonnes.
Of all the discrepancies, the photographs are the least compelling to me. Many things about them scream "fake!", but it provides the fanboys with endless trivial points to argue and distract. There are far greater absurdities in the fundamental physics, which the fanboys can only attempt to deboonk with pseudoscience pilpul.
Yes indeed. The S transponder is a beauty. Apparently in 1969 with analogue tech they had the ability to mulitplex rich data, transfer it from khz to Ghz over a wireless spectrum, feed it into a receiver 240 K miles away, transfer that over a coaxial cable to an IBM mainframe to process in real time and feed the control room :) Sure they did. Fanboys never discuss such things. They argue over shadows. As you said the photos are obvious fakes but so much else is wrong.
I love a bit of fanboy rage. Quite frequently go on their silly YouTube space video channels and wind them up. I guess that makes me a troll as well as a flat Earther conspiracy theorist. Oh well.
Good for you. It is impossible to understand why or how someone becomes so emotionally invested in 'NASA' and the CIA. The blind trust and defense of the ridiculous is frightening.
The GoogleDrive link isnโt working for me.
Granted access, viewer role, hopefully works
Thanks! The embedded/searchable table and google sheet is awesome!
Thanks Eddie, I will create a real database - also for physics in general (huge frauds, nonsense in every domain). I need to schedule and book time to create a real db to provide material, critiques, mapped to sources and links as well.
Thanks Doctor!
๐๐ the fact anyone assumes einsteins smart is hilarious and very telling of how much they understand or actually Read ๐๐
Absolutely all of that is complete nonsense
The GoogleDrive link??