The CIA's Langley complex provided the perfect simulation arena for a NASA-lunar 'landing'. Langley would have provided much of the basic material and telemetry which could be married to a film.
It was the phone call that did it for me. We have been lied to about so much. As for the Hollywood connection, I’m not surprised. They have the means to help create a monumental psyop (and this one is not the only example).
Yes the green phone is a classic. I used to believe when younger, until I saw the golfing and jeeps. Then a light swtich went on and physics, technology and reality intruded. I began to wonder, 'how did they get 500 lb jeeps to the moon, within a payload that is about as large as my car?" They also had a sunglass pouch in their 'spacesuits' for the raybans? Did they wear sunglasses? I have come to conclude that they laugh at us and mock us. Collins does not remember stars in 1969, but writes about billions a few years later. He does not even bother to hide the lie.
They don’t try that hard at all since they’re mocking us, agree. The tragedy is that people still fall for it. Critical thinking has gone out of the window and isn’t taught in schools for good reason.
I was born in 1953, so I lived through all of this (don't forget "New Math"). We've been lied to my whole life, and I just woke up to this fact in 2020. I feel like an idiot.
As you've noted elsewhere, there are spiritual layers to this. E.g., reprising old covenant Israel's apostasy, indicted for having "loved... served... gone after... sought, and worshiped... the sun, the MOON, and all the host of heaven" (Jeremiah 8:2). The NASA frauds also mock Christ's bride, the church who, in Revelation 12:1 is (symbolically) portrayed as having "...the moon under her feet."
Nobody will ever land on The Moon. It’s a plasma light, a cosmic spiritual phenomena, a sentient creation. How could a dusty rock affect tides, women’s bodily functions & plant life…
Smart move framing the simulation argument through IT systems and test environments. The pre-prod to production analogy makes the technical feasibility feel tangible in a way pure aerospace engineering wouldn't. I work adjacent to devops stuff and the network join explanation actuallly does make this read less like pure speculation and more like systems analysis. The Santa Claus flight tracker parallel is clever too, it grounds an abstract technical claim in something people have seen fooled before. That layering technique makes the larger argumentgo down smoother than a straight-up accusation would.
Good post. Let me highlight the few areas where I disagree for discussions sake.
Moon Suit Cooling - The moon suits are cooled by vaporizing water to vacuum through a porous plate. This is a surprisingly effective means of cooling, which is obviously not available on earth. Explained in document "The Apollo Portable Life Support System - Kenneth S. Thomas." The heat load on the suits comes from two sources, solar radiation and body heat. I've independently checked these numbers and they work out.
Visible Stars - On earth during the day stars are not visible, either by eye or film camera. The same should be true on the moon. The stars should only be visible during lunar night.
Agree - If we actually went that would have been an obvious thing to have photographed. The stars look amazing from my country house, imagine how awesome they would be on the dark side of the moon.
It was the phone call that did it for me. We have been lied to about so much. As for the Hollywood connection, I’m not surprised. They have the means to help create a monumental psyop (and this one is not the only example).
Yes the green phone is a classic. I used to believe when younger, until I saw the golfing and jeeps. Then a light swtich went on and physics, technology and reality intruded. I began to wonder, 'how did they get 500 lb jeeps to the moon, within a payload that is about as large as my car?" They also had a sunglass pouch in their 'spacesuits' for the raybans? Did they wear sunglasses? I have come to conclude that they laugh at us and mock us. Collins does not remember stars in 1969, but writes about billions a few years later. He does not even bother to hide the lie.
They don’t try that hard at all since they’re mocking us, agree. The tragedy is that people still fall for it. Critical thinking has gone out of the window and isn’t taught in schools for good reason.
I was born in 1953, so I lived through all of this (don't forget "New Math"). We've been lied to my whole life, and I just woke up to this fact in 2020. I feel like an idiot.
I'm looking forward to reading this.
As you've noted elsewhere, there are spiritual layers to this. E.g., reprising old covenant Israel's apostasy, indicted for having "loved... served... gone after... sought, and worshiped... the sun, the MOON, and all the host of heaven" (Jeremiah 8:2). The NASA frauds also mock Christ's bride, the church who, in Revelation 12:1 is (symbolically) portrayed as having "...the moon under her feet."
Nobody will ever land on The Moon. It’s a plasma light, a cosmic spiritual phenomena, a sentient creation. How could a dusty rock affect tides, women’s bodily functions & plant life…
I have a three word response to Apollo true believers: Van Allen belts.
Looked into it and surprisingly enough they are not a show stopper. Feel free to check my math:
https://erikbuilds.substack.com/p/van-allen-belts-an-obstacle-to-a
Smart move framing the simulation argument through IT systems and test environments. The pre-prod to production analogy makes the technical feasibility feel tangible in a way pure aerospace engineering wouldn't. I work adjacent to devops stuff and the network join explanation actuallly does make this read less like pure speculation and more like systems analysis. The Santa Claus flight tracker parallel is clever too, it grounds an abstract technical claim in something people have seen fooled before. That layering technique makes the larger argumentgo down smoother than a straight-up accusation would.
“Unstabbinated” - let’s see if thriving democracies allow that. LOL.
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Aus.
Great work!
Apollo program was fake. Except Apollo 1, right?
Good post. Let me highlight the few areas where I disagree for discussions sake.
Moon Suit Cooling - The moon suits are cooled by vaporizing water to vacuum through a porous plate. This is a surprisingly effective means of cooling, which is obviously not available on earth. Explained in document "The Apollo Portable Life Support System - Kenneth S. Thomas." The heat load on the suits comes from two sources, solar radiation and body heat. I've independently checked these numbers and they work out.
Visible Stars - On earth during the day stars are not visible, either by eye or film camera. The same should be true on the moon. The stars should only be visible during lunar night.
Then we should have photographic proof taken when the command modules were in orbit on the back side.
Agree - If we actually went that would have been an obvious thing to have photographed. The stars look amazing from my country house, imagine how awesome they would be on the dark side of the moon.
Isn't it because of our atmosphere? Is there a layer of atmosphere on the moon?