As with the Michelson Morley experiment of 1887, Dayton Miller's 300.000 disproofs, 'The Science' ignores evidence it does not like. Anderson also disproved E=mc2. Few have heard of Mr Anderson.
It's very helpful to discover the ways in which each school, including the esoteric Gnostics, treated the ontology of Space and Time; it assists one in tracking the movements of those responsible for the suppression of physics, in particular from Faraday to WW2. I assume that is to whom you refer with the term cult.
Yes Relativity is certainly an ontological, metaphysical cult. Wormholes, blackholes, singularities, multiverses....good God, what a non-physical ensemble of theoretics. You don't need to prove it, just say it with maths and then find something in the cosmos which might give you some support (like 'dark matter'...).
The work of T.F. Torrance is a great companion of those inclined toward the physics of the medium. https://tftorrance.org/1969-262
Thanks a lot, will have a look at this. Did not know of Torrance or his writings. He covers many different domains.
It's very helpful to discover the ways in which each school, including the esoteric Gnostics, treated the ontology of Space and Time; it assists one in tracking the movements of those responsible for the suppression of physics, in particular from Faraday to WW2. I assume that is to whom you refer with the term cult.
Yes Relativity is certainly an ontological, metaphysical cult. Wormholes, blackholes, singularities, multiverses....good God, what a non-physical ensemble of theoretics. You don't need to prove it, just say it with maths and then find something in the cosmos which might give you some support (like 'dark matter'...).