$cientism and 'Evolution'. Jerry Bergman, 'The Dark Side of Charles Darwin'.
Scientific illiteracy, plagiarism, racism and no experimentation, now equals science ! All hail the pigeon breeder. From shrew-to-you.
Darwin was no more a scientist than Al Gore and the corrupt Climate-geddon industry are experts or ‘those who know ‘ anything about the million-variable convection-complexity named climate. The corrupt and tenacious insanity and lack of reason by those who hold so viciously and emotionally to the $cientism of Climate (massive industry), Darwinism & Evolution (massive industry), Rona (massive industry), or Gender Fascism (huge potential market for Pharma), is obvious to anyone outside these cults. In viewing Darwin’s life, reading what his family wrote and said about him, a picture emerges of a deeply troubled, psychologically ill man suffering from what the psycho-babblists term ‘cognitive dissonance’. It is clear that Darwin suffered mental issues. Was he insane and how would this impact his metaphysics, now called 'science' by his acolytes who believe that grass became the gardener ? How did the shrew become you?
A deformed materialist
Other dialectical-materialists including Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Marx, Lenin et al were clearly mental incompetents. Was Darwin, the pigeon breeder who never worked, and whose dialectical-naturalist theories make a simple-minded claim that algae, through some impersonal, unknowable process, became the astronomer, also insane ? Considering the evidence presented by Bergman, a multi-talented PhD and one-time cult-member of the Darwinian science-fiction club, it is likely that Charles Darwin, was a neurological mess [see here]. This psychopathy must have informed Darwin's philosophical work on evolution. We need to emphasise that metaphysics is not science. Evolution has about as much to do with science as a trace chemical 95% emitted by Gaia, has to do with creating weather. Evolutionary dogma is simply a set of beliefs, hopes, dreams and sadly, a vicious construct of anti-human drivel, divorced from reality and common-sense.
Was Darwin a scientist, or just a good liar though pyschologically unstable ? Mr. Bergman's evidence is compelling in convincing the reader of the latter.
A Plagiariser
Pace Jerry Bergman, Darwin stole most of his material from those who had previously offered up turtles to train-engineer theories, some preceding him by centuries. Even the ancient Greeks before and during the time of Aristotle, surmised that creatures could shape-shift and 'change'. From the early modern era, Bergman lists Erasmus Darwin, Buffon, Montesquieu, de Maillet, Diderot, Lamarck, Robert Chambers, Edward Blyth [a clergyman], Carl Vogt [1864 'Lectures on Man']; and Patrick Matthew as source material for Darwin's work. Plagiarism is what many call it. Matthew for instance developed the exact same ideas 28 years in advance of Darwin. His own writings are remarkably similar to what Darwin would later publish as 'his idea'. Darwin lifted from Matthew's theories, very long passages for his book 'Origins of the Species', without citation or acknowledgement.
A Thief
Darwin also copied copiously from his supposed co-author, a 'scientist' named Wallace, and Wallace threatened to sue Darwin, claiming that most of Darwin's writings were in fact originally written and developed by Wallace previous to Darwin's own work on the origins of species [1859] being published. Darwin's ideas were apparently far behind those of Wallace. In 1856 after reading Wallace's unpublished monograph which he had send to him, Darwin wrote that his own theory was late and 'threadbare' in comparison to Wallace's theory. Wallace spent some 30 years accusing Darwin of theft. In general, charges of plagiarism against Darwin were very common once his books came into print.
A Toff
Why did Darwin get the credit for the scientific materialism or naturalism, in support of Atheism ? Darwin was rich, and Wallace et al for the most part were outsiders. $cientism in the Victorian era. Darwin was conveniently the secretary of the Geological Society, and Wallace and others who had developed evolutionary metaphysics, were simply not within the 'inner circle' of men who called themselves 'scientists' in mid-19th century England. Darwin was thus able to pilfer the ideas of others, sell it to his friends; and then demonize the sources. A template for the modern age of $cientism where if you question Stabs, the Rona, Trans-mental illness, the moon-hoax, or Climate-thingy, you are attacked, de-listed, cancelled and in many cases, even murdered. Darwin and his group were first and foremost propagandists, and one aspect of their marketing campaign was the incessant vituperation directed at their critics and those from whom, they stole material. The cult of warming today, or the Rona fascism of recent years, is simply ‘aping’ the cult of Darwin from 150 years ago.
As Bergman writes:
“It is widely recognized that all of the major ideas on biological evolution Darwin discussed predated his published writings.....[quoting from an Oxford historian of science].....the core principles of evolution – struggle for survival, selection, heritability, adaptation, even the appearance of random changes to the hereditary makeup – were fairly common themes in Victorian botany and zoology.”
A Fantasist and a Racist
Bergman lists in a chapter all of the scientific mistakes by Darwin. It is quite a long list. Hundreds running into the thousands are identified. Darwin wrote that whales evolved from bears; negroes would simply 'disappear' [from evolutionary forces]; that sheep which suffered from disease were evidence of a 'new species'; and that rhinos were never killed by other beasts of prey. Darwin supported the discredited ideas of Lamarck [where striving can induce genetic changes]; proposed the tautology of natural selection without proof [you survive therefore you are the 'fittest' – rather an idiotic assessment]; geological uniformity [from Lyell which is another absurd fallacy]; and that there is a magic special little molecule which pushes evolution forward. No experimentation was ever conducted to support any aspect of his theory, by Darwin.
Darwin even pasted fake photos into his books to prove that 'lower species' such as blacks or Fuegians [Patagonian Indians]; were linked to primates; or that people in distress had facial expressions akin to those of monkeys. Darwin is famous for claiming in his ‘Descent of Man’, that the superior and more ‘evolved’ White man will need to exterminate the non-White humans. There is a direct line from Darwinism to White racism and racialist theories of White superiority, which was evidenced and in play during the late 19th century in Africa and elsewhere. White racism was ‘sanctified’ and ‘supported’ by ‘science’. The Nazis in their demonstrations of Jewish, Black and even Christian inferiority, with their myriad measurements and observations of their inferiority to the natural Teuton, used Darwinism as the premise of their ‘science’.
Darwin’s racism and his fantasist theories are typical of what is termed an atheopath, or those who suffer from the various pathologies related to atheist belief including misanthropy and a need to demean the human of whatever race, colour or creed. We need to keep in mind that Darwin’s main ‘enemy’ was Christianity.
So here we have a racist Victorian pigeon-breeder, who performed no science whatsoever , who engaged in plagiarism, deceit and lying, in order to create a metaphysical belief-system which denies reality. These facts should make Darwin a laughingstock not a god.
As Jerry Bergman outlines in this great book, no evidence, supports the rather ancient Religion of Evolution, nor the premise that Darwin was a scientist. Quite the opposite. Darwin was a confused, mentally unbalanced, wealthy pigeon breeder, whose purloined metaphysics have been useful to the power mongering, and mentally distorted elite and those who would prefer to live in the fantasy land of shrew-to-you.
