Scientism and the New Secular Religions
Climate, Evolution, Corona and others. Belief systems, not science.
Francis Bacon (1562-1626) of the ‘Renaissance’, basing his work on previous generations without supplying sources or credit, applied factual gathering and analysis, along with experimentation and ‘proofs’ to arrive a method of scientific inquiry. He developed some steps from a hypothesis to experimentation and observation. This was nothing new. It had been done since the time of Aristotle and was the basis for many practical discoveries in both the ancient and medieval Christian world. What had changed was some of the mechanics and tooling. But this ‘scientific method’ of Bacon’s was not perforce that extraordinary.
Long before Francis Bacon many others had developed logical frameworks for investigation. Roger Bacon (1214-1292) a Christian Friar, was an early promoter of a ‘scientific method’ or framework, successfully setting out a model of an experimental science based on his study of optics. The latter was used in his extension of experimental science to include new medicines and the general health care of the body. As with Francis Bacon, Roger Bacon was building on what had transpired previously, adding new details to existing ideas and approaches. He departed from Francis Bacon by attempting to reduce scientific study to theological absolutes.
Today of course we have the opposite application of Roger Bacon – the reduction of everything to some ‘scientific’ absolute, which is often, anti-rational, anti-science. This is a metaphysical and philosophical project which purports to elevate abstract scientific concepts into deities. A replacement for all other systems of thought and worldviews. A new religion called Scientism.
Scientism is the cult of 'science'. There is no true 'science' if you apply a worldview to a scientific process and transform all data, nor matter how offensive to your cult doctrine, to support your theology. German National Socialists [Nazis]; Communists and Atheists have, and do, pervert science to sell their cult dogma. Evolutionary cant was used by the Nazis to justify racial Darwinism, paraded as science. Lysenko and other Atheist evolutionists were scientists who proved that 'environmental factors' can be used to form more perfect organisms. The 140 years of doom-mongering nonsense from the Climate-cult, premised on the supposed satanic and destructive nature of plant food is an exercise in fraud and stupidity. Corona and the imposition of what should only be termed a Medical Nazism is simply the latest incarnation of ‘The Science’ or Scientism used to terrorise, control and even murder.
Here are some cult doctrines in vogue in the modern world, which offend the basic ideas of reason and science:
Cult of Warm or Change
-Co2 a plant food, is now labelled by experts as a toxin. How then would photosynthesis work, if Co2 was a noxious substance?
-Co2 is a trace chemical, yet we are told by the media and educational elite, that a trace chemical now causes weather. This is impossible since trace chemicals are derivatives of larger processes [Co2 is derived from the hydrological process].
-Climate variables, loops, many-to-many-relationships, and causation factors are not well understood. Ergo there can be no 'settled science'. How can you predict a non-existent positive 'greenhouse effect' from a trace chemical, if the entirety of the process is not understood ?
-Gaia emits 95% of the Co2 trace chemical. Logically if the cult of warm is correct, one would assume that killing part of this natural emission is the most reasonable path to limiting this baleful chemical. How would killing Gaia, save her?
Cult of Atheism
-According to evolution the 10.000 books of software-DNA code that each human contains was coded and organized by chance. This ‘science’ by default, believes that software code can be self-created and that functionality through the power of miracles, easily added to DNA and genetic functions
-In software code mutations are 'bugs' and kill functionality. In organism’s mutations kill or degrade cell information. How then would mutations drive pond scum to become a professor of climate theology?
-A simple protein has 300 amino acids. Evolution has yet to demonstrate that even 1 single protein can self-create using 20 amino acids in a functional-working sequence.
-The average human has over 2 million proteins coded by 30.000 or so genes. The actual number is unknown – it might be 10 million. If you can't demonstrate how 1 protein sequence is established by 'chance' is it reasonable to suppose that 2 million such patterns were randomly created?
-The single cell is more complex than an urban centre. The human has 70 trillion of these nano-technological marvels. Evolution has not even come close to proving that a complex single cell could evolve by 'chance' from a 'soupy mixture'. Is it reasonable to believe that 70 Trillion of such complexities arose by random error?
-Stephen Hawking and Atheist cosmologists posit ex nihilo virgin universe births, random explosions leading to structure, and life from dead matter or from no matter at all. These miraculous, supernatural occurrences have not been demonstrated to be even remotely possible. Is the universe's 'virgin birth', or abiogenesis a reasonable or unreasonable conclusion?
Cult of Rona
-A rounding error death rate of 0.3% is deemed a ‘pandemic’ based on false PCR tests and ‘cases’
-This fake pandemic or scamdemic is used to lockdown populations, diaper them, and stab them with unknown and untested substances
-Criminals from the Pharma Industry, government, various international organisations, and those who stand to benefit from the imposition of health fascism, enjoy endless profits and power
-The millions of dead and injured from the poisons, lockdowns and 3 years of psychological terror are not only disregarded but demeaned and forgotten
-Tens of thousands of old people died suddenly in socialised health institutions and old age homes around the world, at the same time, correlated with huge rollouts of midazolam an end of life respiratory drug often used with morphine to kill those in extreme pain within palliative care or end of life care. No one seems to care or be perplexed by this ‘coincidence’
-All of the above is called ‘health care’ and was based on ‘The Science’
The above are just some manifestations of Scientism. There is nothing rational, objective, literate, observable, demonstrable, replicable or logical about any of them. You cannot use any of their ‘models’ to prove anything, including what happened in the past. A climate ‘model’ applied to ‘weather’ and temperatures of 10 years ago, produces nothing but gibberish. It is well known that the ‘models’ supporting ‘undirected’ evolution are based on fraudulent code. The Corona modelling exercises were episodes of incompetence and absurdity, proffered by the same gatekeepers of failures who espoused past scamdemics including mad-cow disease.
The modern world is awash in religious cults and these secular religions demand theological belief, rituals, prostrations, prayers and complete obeisance. They are not ‘science’.