Summarising the failures of the Big Bang. $cientism's very religious views.
Next article will summarise the failures of Netwon and Einstein since they are related to, and inform the Big Bang bust.
Big Bang in big trouble
There are many proofs against the Big Bang. Few are known or discussed. How would a ‘bang’ create information, structure, order and life? This is a philosophical program not a ‘science’. The ‘10 Easy steps’ from nothing to the ‘Big Bang’ and then to you, is analysed here.
The underlying Philosophy of the Big Bang is deeply religious (link to post)
There is no proof which supports the religious tenets, namely mechancial naturalism, of the Big Bang theology. The Banging religion is anti-humanist, in that it demands a purely naturalistic (pagan) explanation for the creation of the universe, life, intelligence and information. Within this theology, our planet is a poor, reduced spheroid in the fringes of the universe. Humans are unimportant, our species simply a chance causation, designed by a random fluctuation of material and matter, akin to developed bacteria, related to and maybe inferior to the great ape. It is an atavistic theology and philosophy.
Supposedly, pace the Catholic priest and physicist Lemaitre and the industry he helped to create, the following naturalistic process occurred: a cosmic egg containing all universal matter exploded (how formed?), fusion reaction and massive heat ensued, an expansion, slowdown, then acceleration, cooling, isotropy, and homogeneity (disproven), gravity appears, galaxy and planet formation somehow occurred and improbably stardust and inanimate matter became information systems and life. This philosophical nonsense, built as a religio-scientific framework without foundational proof, is sold as ‘fact’. It is anything but factual or proven.
Some reasons why the Big Bang is simply rubbish are given below.
The First Law of Thermodynamics states that matter cannot be created nor destroyed, it can only be changed from one form to another.  Matter cannot simply create itself and in the ‘real world’ matter cannot spontaneously arise from nothing, whether or not the instigating event is an explosion.  There is no observational evidence to disprove the First Law of Thermodynamics.Â
Radiation spectrum disproves the Big Bang (links to post with details)
In general, we can say that two things would falsify the Big Bang religion: Â 1-if the blackbody radiation spectrum is not found and 2-if the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation or CMB possesses a spectrum that is substantially different from a blackbody. Â Astronomical observations confirm these two objections. The Big Bang is therefore invalid.
Contrary to STR and Banging theology, stellar galaxies should be far less than 1 billion years old, but this is not what ‘The Science’ has found. Exploding Supernovae are young.  Galaxies larger than ours are newly created. Super galaxies have formed in short periods of time. According to STR and Banging, the Universe should collapse on itself and either reform or cease to exist. Magical dark matter and dark energy are invoked to prevent a collapse, neither has been found or can even be described. JWT observations suggest that the universe may be a flat disc and not curved.
‘The Science’ has no ‘consensus’ on the size, shape or form of the Universe. It might be expanding. It might be expanding and contracting. It might be in a steady state. It might not be in a steady state. The universe might well be a flat disc pace the JWT data. Or maybe not. Most likely it is a flat disc, but we might never know.
To be fair to the one of the few ‘insights’ from Einstein, Planck probes may suggest a slight curve of the universe which means that time dilation would be valid (clocks on the Earth would run much faster than in space).  This is Einstein’s time-dilation and his ‘Twin paradox’ where a twin in space ages less quickly if he is travelling in a rocket near the speed of light (and that is the important variable), than his twin on Earth. Clocks due to gravity, run ‘faster’ on Earth than in space.
If true, this would mean that the billions of years of cosmic space formation would be rendered in the thousands or millions on Earth, depending on the clock dilation impact from a slight curvature and Einstein’s view that large objects due to gravity, slow down time. This by itself would upend modern cosmology and it would be the end of long ages on Earth. You can hear heads exploding at the very idea!
If no time dilation it is still a lose for ‘The Science’
However, if the slight curvature of space is not true and time-dilation is invalid and the JWT flat disc observation is accurate, it is still a lose for cosmology, given that the Big Bang and Relativity promote a fairly large curvature. Yet, ironically but deliberately, in promoting their space-curve dimension, ‘The Science’ does not bother to calculate the impact on time, because it would destroy long ages on this planet. Rocks and hard places.
It must be said that the concept of space and time being merged into a curved 4th dimension is frankly ridiculous, unproven and just another mental experiment. In this theory there is no absolute time, and the past, the present and the future do not exist independently of each other. In real life, time is outside of space and is a human only creation. Inanimate matter does not consider ‘time’.Â
Cosmic Background Radiation disproves the Big Bang
Cosmic Microwave Background radiation or CMB, disproves the Big Bang theology, and this is confirmed by the James Webb Telescope. Â The universe as viewed from the Earth is largely isotropic or homogenous but with 4 defined anisotropies or heterogenous patterns. This heterogeneity indicates that the Earth is near the barycentre of the universe. Â The CMB axis when viewed from the Earth appears to show geo-centricity, once again calling into disrepute the Copernican religion of Sun Worship.
Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations disproves the Big Bang
All of the above has been confirmed by WMAP data which cannot be easily dismissed or explained away. WMAP observations thrust a dagger right into the heart of the Banging model leading to laments about the axis of evil, or the centricity of the Earth within the universe (anathema!).
Redshifts disprove endless cosmological time
Halton Arp’s and Van Flanderen’s models and observations, suggest that light from distant galaxies it is much younger than we believe, the matter is new, not old, and that the distance-velocity relation means the Universe is probably not expanding. This eliminates the need for the mythical dark matter and dark energy.Â
SLOAN Digital Sky Survey disproves the Big Bang
SDSS as a catalogue of galaxial and quasar data is without parallel in history.  The Big Bang belief that ‘Redshifting’ proves an infinite universe of some 14 billion years of age has been rubbished by SDSS data.  Even worse for Copernicans, the data confirming Redshift as an indication of a younger age rather than distance, completely eviscerates the need for a huge universe as well as long ages.  In fact, it is possible given Arp’s calculations and SDSS data, that we would have a universe only a little larger than Ptolemy’s, and certainly not large enough to accommodate 13.7 billion years of ‘evolution’.  The whole edifice of modern Scientism would be demolished.
Supernova’s disprove Banging
About 300 to 400 supernova remnants (SNRs) are supposedly known, but this is less than half of what the Bang predicts.  Frantic searches using radio observations using the ‘Very Large Array’ (VLA) in New Mexico and the MeerKAT array of radio telescopes in South Africa have come up empty.  We should see our galaxy littered with the debris from exploding stars and the reality is we don’t.Â
Quasars and Black Holes are problems for the Bangers
[Quasars: quasar, an astronomical object of very high luminosity found in the centres of some galaxies and powered by gas spiralling at high velocity into an extremely large black hole.]
Some observed quasars refute the Bang theory with the biggest known cluster of quasars called the Huge-Large Quasar Group (Huge-LQG) being too large to be accommodated within the assumptions underlying the Bang theory.  Currently, the accepted cosmological model demands that nothing larger than 1.2 billion light years can exist. This far distant cluster of quasars is nearly 4 billion light years in diameter. Bangers cannot explain quasars in the context of formation, youth, distance, or size.
Black holes are also an issue for the Big Bang, contradicted by Quantum Mechanics, with Hawking admitting before he died that if Quantum Mechanics is true, Black Holes likely don’t exist. These ‘holes’ where gravity regresses to a singular point remain unproven theories not replicable in lab environments, nor supported by astronomical observations. Such ‘holes’ are ‘black’ because they cannot emit photons or light and cannot be detected except by complex mapping of astronomical observations. They are therefore theories not facts, akin to dark matter, and dark energy.
If Black Holes don’t exist the origins of the ‘Big Bang’ would have to be reassessed given that most physicists believe that a singularity point explosion, similar to what occurs with a Black Hole, is the ‘genesis’ of the Big Bang. Singularity cannot occur if Quantum Mechanics is valid.
Bottom Line
These are just summaries of some important issues with the Big Bang. The links to the posts have details and sources. If the above discussion is only partially true than heliocentricity, the ‘Copernican principle’ and the Big Bang are rubbished, and cosmology will need new ideas and models to be developed to explain the physical and mechanical reality of our universe.
Yet given the vast extent of money, power and prestige at work and at risk, a mechanical-reality based view of the universe is unlikely to materialise. It is clear that modern cosmology is founded upon a religious-philosophical framework and that competing models and interpretations are suppressed. It is a veritable Church with its own liturgy, hierarchy and gospels.
Unfortunately, few know about the scientific observations and data analysis which disprove the religio-cosmological narratives. Censorship and punishment are violent and rife and this is a key defining feature of ‘$cientism’. Those who object to the church of cosmology will be pilloried, exiled, financially impacted and anathematised.
The next post is related to this one and deals with Newton and Einstein and the errors and disinformation generated by their theories.