Yuri Gagarin's faked 1961 flight, the Russian space-con and the Apollo film program.

The Russians! When you need an enemy - real or imagined - they are always at hand. Without the Russians the Apollo film project & massive money laundering enterprise would never have occurred.

The peasant amateur was the ‘first in space’, whatever ‘space’ might mean. Idiot box say. Newspapers say. Teacher giving poetic praise with tears in his eyes say. BBC say. AI say. Everyone say. Everyone believes Soviet propaganda to be true. Globaloneywarming. Climate Change. Evolution. Virology. ‘Rona’. ‘Viruses’. WMD. 9-11. Apollo 11. Gagarin. The forever war with Russia.

“One moment I see Africa, another the horizon, another the sky. I had barely enough time to cover myself to protect my eyes from the Sun’s rays. I put my legs to the porthole, but didn’t close the blinds.”

Yuri Gagarin, after his ‘flight’, trying to remember what he saw from a spinning, whirling, gyrating can, travelling at 17,000 mph for almost 2 hours. Blinded by the Sun, comrade Yuri piloted an out of control cannon ball to a landing zone near his parachute training base in Saratov Russia. What a hero. Herculean. You go Yuri.

The current forever war with Russia started right after World War II. A main theatre of this ‘war’ has been in ‘the Science’ and Technology domains. The system, ‘Capitalist’ or ‘Communist’, which could evidence its scientific and technological superiority could claim ‘victory’ in the state’s secular objective of total-rule over all aspects of society. A technocracy, based on ‘the Science’, buttressed by its supposed offspring technology (the relationship is exactly the opposite), would confer domination to the winner. So slithers ‘Western Civilisation’ into Totalitarian dysfunction and dystopia.

The famous ‘space-race’ was itself a massive con of course, manufactured by both the Russians and the Americans and this domain became a ‘front’ within the ‘Cold War’ which should simply be relabelled the ‘forever war’ between the US and Russia. The ‘forever war’ is getting ever closer to a ‘hot war’ and potentially a nuclear exchange. [Side note: Few if any ‘democrats’ or ‘liberals’ seem troubled by the spectre of nuclear carnage and destruction. For these ‘enlightened’ acolytes of ‘the Science’ destroying the Russkies is uber alles (‘Remember Carthage’, as Cato the Elder supposedly intoned in the Roman Senate after every one of his speeches)].

It could appear to be somewhat odd that the Russians are at the very heart of the space-race-con and the lucrative NASA-money laundering enterprise. Chalk and cheese it may appear, but both sides benefit. It is in some ways a natural partnership between the Russkies and Americans in ‘space’. Always has been thus.

When viewed historically and when you connect the dots, the NASA space-fraud starts with the Russians. For whatever reason people still believe Soviet propaganda about Gagarin and being ‘first in space’. It was the Soviets who first initiated and manufactured the space-con. The Americans have simply followed suit and created a massive complex of pilfer and plunder.

This post sketches the Russian fraud of Gagarin’s ‘flight’ which galvanised NASA and the Apollo program. The next post moves on to Shepard, Grissom and Enos that courageous chimp in 1961, and then to Glenn in 1962. Irony of ironies. The Russians. Again. Sparta and Athens. Carthage and Rome. Britain and France. Wind Turbines and Birds. Pharma poisons and your body. Fake news and your mental health.

The Apollo Moon 'landings'. Were the moon landings staged and filmed? A compendium of material and questions.

Key areas:

• Gagarin’s amateurish past

• The technology used (Vostok) and its many problems

• Ilyushin’s failure 5 days before Gagarin’s fraud

• Nothing but failure, piles of dead, then suddenly success!

• Cosmonaut voices caught on radio as they were incinerated

• Nothing but American disasters, then magically 3 weeks after Gagarin, Shepard goes into sub-orbit

• No heat shields on the American modules

• Grissom’s 1961 near death experience, linked with his 1967 death

• No existing, verifiable evidence to support any of the claims made by either side

• Money laundering and looting (the real point of the space-race-con)

“It was the summer of ‘69….oh yeah…me and my lunar module in ‘69…”

(Bryan Adams’ key note song at his concert at the Sea of Tranquility, Moon, 1989. 60.000 fans attended, all of whom arrived by the ‘moon bus’. You remember the moon bus. Promised 40 years ago. Zooming and zipping through that radiation is so easy. Mars by 2029 latest - NASA say, Musk say. Bryan is getting ready for the big gig on Mars. ‘Me and my Mars module baby in ‘29’…)

It is not anti-science, nor anti-American to question the narrative that NASA landed 12 men on the moon between 1969 and 1972. In the succeeding 53 years since the Apollo program was shut down, NASA has gone back to the moon exactly zero times, and can provide no proof of a single ‘space’ flight more than 400 miles in altitude from the Earth’s surface. Further, NASA not only claims to have rather effortlessly landed 12 men on the moon using primitive technology, but they also supplied the (actor) nauts with EV jeeps and golf clubs.

Alleged proofs capture the (actor) nauts having a merry old time, driving, wheeling, hitting some balls, telling jokes and clowning around on the ‘light side’ of the lunar orb in 250 F temperature, as they were carpet bombed by radiation. No injuries, no deaths, no issues, no disasters. Everything running perfectly the first time it is tried. There and back. Frodo and Sam.

Those NASA guys were so smart! Smartest guys evah! Sure, if you say so.

That is what the narrative claims. Consider the following by way of analogy.

The moon, depending on its orbital journey, is some 238,000 miles away from this planet. So, if we take 400 miles which is the maximum altitude that can be proven to have been reached (Challenger, 1997) and divide by 238,000 miles, we have a difference of 99.832%. Quite a margin. This means that NASA has proven to have flown only 0.168% of the distance to the moon. But we the sheeple believe that the missing 99.832% of the distance was effortlessly covered by the smartest guys evah.

In related news I ran the marathon, even though the only physical evidence for my running endurance is a 0.5 mile jaunt. I can show digital images and photos to ‘prove’ I finished. Don’t be a denier and stop whining about all the inconsistencies in the digital reprints of my ‘finish’. Camera aperture fool.

The physical evidence simply does not support NASA’s claim as outlined in a longer post. The photos are the least important point to emphasise as is NASA’s current claim of penury which is also laughable (Actornaut John Glenn’s claim as a US politician). NASA’s budget is U$25 billion per annum. NASA has collected well over U$ 1 Trillion in today’s currency since the 1970s. The total Apollo budget in today’s money was a mere ~U$200 billion in today’s currency by comparison. There has been more than enough money to go the moon and beyond many times, especially if you have supposedly already achieved a lunar landing 6 times.

We should remember that:

NASA is a part of the US military. NASA’s real mission is to find a way to weaponise and control space by facilitating nuclear warheads in space to be pointed back at the Earth. The moon or other manmade sites can be used for this. Nonsense about zooming to Mars, or doing a Hans Solo and fighting Death Stars, are mis-directions.

If the Americans had actually landed on the moon in 1969, they would have colonised it by now and nuclear warheads would be pointed back at this planet.

There is also a good reason why NASA is so intertwined with and invested in Hollywood and film studios. There is a long history of cooperation: Disney, Kubrick, Lucas and many others. Good theatre and distractions. Keep the sheeple entertained and occupied. Make them believers. The magic of film used to deceive and convince. Starship Clown-er-prise with Captain Quirk and the sexy alien girls. Hans and friends saving the universe. Space travel made easy. Jump in, and zoom off. Surely you watched Quirk, Spock et al and earned your ‘science’ bona-fides?

Space defined?

We should keep in mind that the definition of ‘space’ is extraordinarily flexible. There is no reason to declare that 50 or 200 miles in altitude is ‘space’. This is nowhere close to the absolute edge of the Earth’s atmosphere which is some 1000 miles in altitude. Space must at least begin where the Earth’s unique atmosphere ends.

Consider that the country of Canada is ~4800 miles (~8000 km) in distance from east to west. ‘The science’ is claiming that the mileage between Toronto and its suburb called Oshawa, which is 50 miles away, and ~1% of the total distance of the country, is the equivalent in altitudinal terms, to ‘space’. This is frankly ridiculous.

50 or even 200 miles from our surface cannot possibly be described as ‘space’. 200 miles is barely halfway between Toronto and Montreal and is 4% of the total distance across Canada. But remember the propaganda ‘it is a small world after all’. No it isn’t.

200 miles is still within the Earth’s atmospheric layers and is at best 20% from the outer edge of the atmosphere. Many claim that our ‘atmosphere’ might even ‘capture’ the moon itself. ‘The Science’ as usual, is riven by disagreement.

‘Space’ as currently defined is therefore another chimera. It is another ‘imponderable’ (to quote word-salad-maker Einstein), a flexible term, easily adapted to marketing and propaganda. You need to ask the skill-testing question when someone mentions space – ‘what do you mean by space and what altitude are you discussing and why is that ‘space’?’

Artistic conception of Vostok 1 source . The cannon ball looked nothing like this reimagining, nor the images issued by Soviet propaganda.

The Russkies and money

NASA was never alone in its Apollo fraud. The Russians were the genesis of the entire Apollo legend. The Soviets generated, helped and enabled the Apollo fraud to germinate and then take root in the global consciousness. In return they were able to claim victory to be the first in ‘space’. The Russians also received billions in payouts during the ‘Cold War’ in food, supplies and direct monetary assistance. Keeping the bankrupt Soviet empire alive and all that. Good for business and money-laundering the Americans would say.

It is not a ‘conspiracy’ to suppose that the reality of this largesse outweighed concerns the Russians had about Apollo’s veracity. Today the Russians earn billions for the use of their Soyuz craft. In realpolitik there are incentives and bribes. There is little motivation for the Russians to get into a shouting match with the Americans over the collective ‘space-race’-moon-landing-con. They are both guilty of fraud - and murder.

Gagarin’s ridiculous fable

If anyone looks into the declaration that Yuri Gagarin was the ‘first man in orbital space’ (April 12, 1961), you will quickly see that this is also a deception. There are just too many issues with the propaganda that Yuri, the hero-peasant, flew 200 miles in altitude and circumnavigated the globe at 17.000 miles per hour, with a flight duration of 1 hour and 48 minutes.

First, there is no evidence that Gagarin was a pilot of experience, note or skill, let alone capable of controlling an out-of-control alloy-can which resembled a cannon-ball, orbiting the Earth in ‘space’ or 200 miles from the surface, at 17,000 mph for almost 2 hours. Gagarin was not a prominent pilot, there is no record that he was even an able aviator, nor did he display any extraordinary skills or aptitude in general.

There is not a single test case, or proof, of Gagarin controlling any object, in reality, or in simulation, at 17,000 mph. For an untrained person, the G force alone, moving from 0 mph or 1-Gravity (1-G, your weight in a chair on Earth) on a launch pad to 17,000 mph within minutes, at a 6-8 G velocity, and then sustaining that incredible rate to achieve ‘orbit’ would either kill you, render you unconscious, or make you so nauseous and ill you would be unable to function. But not if you are Yuri the hero-peasant. Grins and thumbs up comrade.

Replica in Moscow of the cannon ball and Gagarin in the garish orange costume.

It would take hundreds, or thousands of hours, of body-breaking practice, to handle a craft at that speed, shaking, quivering, moving. You are basically sitting on a rocket. No history of advanced pilot training for Gagarin exists before April 1961 and he had dozens, maybe 100 of hours of flight time. The minimum for NASA was 5000 hours.

Second, the Vostok capsule looked like a large cannon-ball, something from a bad fiction movie. There is no proof that such a design could enter space and re-enter the Earth’s atmosphere and land in a pre-determined area. There is no design or mechanical evidence proving that it could be piloted, controlled and managed in a way to allow a flight into the orbital area of ‘space’. Such a design is not even considered for modern space travel.

In fact, no details on how this capsule worked or how it was manoeuvred by the amateur-pilot Gagarin who had very few hours of flight experience, has ever been offered and independently verified. The Russians did not even bother to explain if the medieval design possessed ‘ablative resin or beryllium heat shields’ to protect against the heat and friction of re-entry. The photo below does not reveal a heat shield (which would reside on the bell-end). This is basically the only photo there is of Gagarin’s cannon ball at rest after landing. At least NASA put in the effort to try and convince the hoi-polloi that ‘ablative resin shields’ were used.

Gagarin’s Vostok 1 cannon ball near Saratov. I am supposed to believe that this large cannon ball housed complex equipment along with the happy peasant-boy Gagarin, and that this very ‘aerodynamic’ object zipped and zoomed through ‘space’ and re-entered the atmosphere, effecting a parachute guided landing. It looks like a hunk of metal set on fire and dumped from high altitude onto a field.

Third, Gagarin’s recollection of his flight does not comport with the actual trajectory or route he supposedly took. The ‘recordings’ emitted from Vostok 1 which supposedly describe geographical Earth landmarks as Vostok 1 completed its circumnavigation, do not comport with the alleged flight path. Observations are given for locations that the Vostok capsule did not fly over.

There is zero chance that the flying cannon ball would have been ‘managed’ along the below flight path by the untrained peasant Gagarin and the extraordinarily primitive communication technology that was used. Gagarin happily admitted that his supposed reportage during the flight was actually transmitted from a tape recorder with pre-recorded descriptions. Thanks Yuri.

We are to believe that this planned route was accomplished and satisfied and to ignore the incongruence of the pre-recorded tape description with Gagarin’s confused testimony.

When interviewed and asked details he appeared confused or contradictory. Like Armstrong, Gagarin could not remember if the craft was doing an Elvis and gyrating, shaking or quaking during the flight, or how the capsule behaved, nor much of anything to do with systems, electronics, or measurements. Did he really see parts of America in the darkness? Like Armstrong he certainly did not remember seeing stars.

Fourth, there are no primary, intimate pictures or images of Gagarin at the launch pad, getting into the capsule nor are there any photos of what he claims to have seen from the capsule. His cannon-ball capsule possessed no camera. There are no photos of the Earth from the cannon ball proving he orbited the planet. There are no photos of the cannon ball and its Doctor Strangelove-rider from Earth proving his flight path. There are no verifiable photos proving a liftoff. There are no photos proving a descent.

You go Yuri.

Radio transmissions were limited to the ‘middle part’ of the flight, and these were controlled by Moscow and of short duration. There were no communications from the beginning or the end of the flight. There are no independent verifications of the communications.

Fifth, there are issues with the landing, the landing zone location, and the great accuracy of hitting such a reasonably small postage-stamp-sized area from ‘space’ at 17,000 mph, using very crude systems. This would have been mathematically impossible. Gagarin parachuted down in the same area (Saratov air force base) where he had trained for parachuting and the capsule ‘landed’ without him. No photographic verification of Gagarin ejecting from the capsule and parachuting down exists.

Consider:

A modern plane flies at roughly 30.000 feet or 6 miles in altitude or 11 km. I can clearly see them (many emitting chemtrails). But apparently, no one in Soviet cosmology had the intelligence to have cameras at the ready to record the pilot’s ejection, his inflated parachute, nor the parachute enabled descent of a vehicle which would clearly be in view.

This insults common sense.

The Soviets claimed they ‘tracked’ the flight, so obviously you could ‘track’ the flight and be ready with cameras as the descent began. They had plenty of time within the general landing zone and region, to coordinate this. They apparently landed within 10 miles of the proposed landing site. You can drive that distance in 30 minutes. Or you can point a camera at an object descending from that distance.

The only photo of the downed capsule was taken long after its supposed landing.

So who actually saw the landing? One story is that two school children saw the 3-metre-long capsule descending to a field not far from their school near Saratov and watched it bounce off the ground and then crater a hole and stop. It is unclear if the hero landing nearby, quit his parachute and became engaged with a blackboard to explain ‘the science’ and logistics of what had just happened to the kids.

A second story has a babushka and her grand-child as wild-eyed, frightened witnesses who saw the descent of the pilot and believed that Gagarin might be an alien. Watched by this pair, Gagarin parachuted to safety seemingly unharmed by his fanastic flight and descent. The story is that, getting up in his orange suit and dragging his parachute, the grinning hero walked over to the old lady and asked to be taken to a telephone because he had an important call to make to Moscow.

Of course he did. We do love those penetrating apposite phrases from our heroes. Maybe comrade Yuri flexed his biceps and started to roll a ciggy as well. Just too cool.

Landing with analogue circuits?

The narrative around Gagarin’s landing was never released until long after the event. This scenario was reused by the Americans. We have the Russians to thank for the rather artful explanation of how men and modules landed safely and serenely back on Earth during the 1960s and 70s directly within their landing zones. The Russians chose land. The Americans water. It was all showbiz.

The fiction maintains that analogue circuit programming of the most intelligent variety, was used. Please. There was no software. It was hardcoded program logic circa 1961. Thus, we have:

1-At a predetermined, programmed time, the onboard system initiates the re-entry sequence (this ‘system’ is usually referred to as a ‘computer’, but in reality it was nothing like a computer and is better considered as a primitive analogue-logic board) .

2-The programming logic fires retro-rockets to slow down the canon ball and bring it out of orbit. Don’t ask for proof of this.

3-The atmosphere will ‘brake’ the capsule as it contacts the denser levels. Don’t ask to see test cases proving this.

4-At a pre-determined altitude of around 7 km, the ‘systems’ would initiate the parachute sequence. This is really a great deal of fun.

a. Step 1, Pyromania, cue Def Leppard: The system triggers a small explosive charge which blows off the covers of the parachute compartments which are inside the main capsule, near the top.

b. Step 2, Smaller chute deployment: After the fireworks, a spring mechanism was programmed to then deploy the smaller or ‘drogue’ parachute. This would help stabilise the wobbling, shaking capsule, and help deploy the larger chute.

c. Step 3, Main chute: Somehow the smaller chute pulls out and releases the uninflated main parachute, which would then fully inflate to slow the capsule to its final landing speed.

The above sequence was of course practiced endless numbers of times to induce perfection in system and pilot actions.

• Test cases, detailed metrics, proofs of testing and feedback on performance over time were conducted and can be reviewed today.

• Control tests of both piloted and unpiloted case examples are known and confirmed.

• The blown off covers of the parachute chambers are on display and many exist for your investigation.

• The original circuit board and logic is available for full review.

Of course not! There is no proof of anything!

Don’t do Dev cycles. Don’t do Testing. Don’t simulate. Just release the bloody code and see what happens!

No evidence, No tracking

There is little to no evidence that these systems or maneuvers were built and tested in development before being sent into production. No documentation exists that you can study and analyse. Nor is there any evidence that hard-wired logic circuits deploying relays, transistors, resisters and primitive programming could possibly be used in synchronicity within a cannon ball travelling at 17,000 mph.

There are zero tests to prove this, nor is there any evidence that a communications centre on Earth could communicate with Dr. Strangelove Gagarin in his cannon ball at 200 miles in altitude. It is simply impossible that the above scenario would work without years of testing, failure and rework.

No phyiscal proofs of the Vostok 1 system or its alleged components exist. No verified test cases of any part of the take-off, flight, comms, or landing scenarios can be viewed.

It was not tracked. Saying it was tracked betrays a lack of understanding of how RADAR operates.

Well, let’s have a quick look at ‘RADAR’ or radio-wave and ranging detection, in 1961. We can ‘debunk’ the tracking Fanboys in one simple table.

The same holds true by the way for 1969. Apollo 11’s signals were cloaked (NASA confirms this), but even if a signal was sent, you are tracking nothing.

RADAR tracking in 1961 was limited to objects 15 miles or lower in altitude. It was a crude system. Essentially you are bouncing a radio beam at a frequency into the air. It hits an object, the signal returns, is translated and analysed. You don’t know if the object is a Soviet bomber or a miniature badger flying a soup can.

The UK in 1961 had around 50 RADAR stations for example. They were not networked. Given Yuri’s flight path there was no way he was tracked by ‘NATO’, NASA or the Eye of Sauron in ‘real time’ for the length of his faux-voyage. The range was limited, the stations did not align with his flight path; they were not interconnected, no real time data processing was possible, the compute and networking did not exist.

NASA’s supposed ‘signal’ confirmation was false, based on claims that their Eye of Sauron intercepted Soviet radio transmissions. These transmissions were a deceit and the only record of transmissions which could have been intercepted are some broken comms during the middle of the flight, lasting maybe 10 minutes. Yuri was apparently in orbit for almost 2 hours. Do the maths.

Health and Safety?

Further, a normal person is not going to enter a cannon ball, fly around the globe 200 miles in altitude at 17.000 mph, and ‘hope’ that the system works. The G force on acceleration alone, to go from 0 to 17,000 mph in 8-9 minutes, would make you ill or worse, especially for Gagarin, who was essentially, untrained.

Before Gagarin, there is nothing but a long list of dead Russian cosmonauts (listed below). Yet the peasant hero who ‘fought the Nazis’ was not concerned or perplexed.

Before Gagarin took flight, the Russian cosmology program amassed a huge pile of dead. Anyone, with a normal IQ, would demand irrefutable, tested proof of ‘health and safety’ and would be intimately involved in the system’s testing and validation. There is no evidence that Gagarin knew anything about Vostok I, or was involved with the testing and analysis of the capsule and its components. We can only conclude that Gagarin was either a round-faced peasant idiot who ‘trusted the science’, or he knew full well that he was part of a movie set.

The proofs and logical deduction to support Gagarin’s foray and return are almost non-existent.

Whizzing around at 17,000 mph, the largely untrained amateur was not sick, or dead. No health or safety issues. He landed, as would the American actor-nauts, in robust form, happy, unaffected by the dangers of ‘space’, earnest to relay the good news to Moscow. In reality, as soon as he landed on his fictitious field of dreams Gagarin was doomed to be murdered.

Gagarin’s discrete, subtle monument near his parachute training centre and where he ‘landed’. The Soviets were nothing if not demure and humble.

Soviet Marketing

Gagarin was simply a propaganda actor used by the Soviets to market the Communist’s ‘scientific’ prestige and unite the Soviet Union behind a great ‘success’ in which its space prowess had eclipsed that of the ‘capitalist’ powers. There are TV reels and newspaper photos of Russian-Soviet citizens crying in pride over Gagarin’s accomplishment. The Communists could strut their bona fides. The people in general seemed emotionally overwhelmed by Gagarin’s ‘flight’ and a resurgent and quite emotive-national-Sovietism developed. Confidence returned to the Soviet state. The Red machine had done what was deemed impossible. The Russkies had beat the hated Americans.

Gagarin died in 1968, 7 years after his supposed world-shaking event. The official story is that he died in a ‘plane crash’. At least it was not from a ‘car accident’ or a ‘suicide’ with the standard note on the kitchen table with a mea culpa confession. After 1961 and his world tour, he was shuffled off into obscurity. It was during these years that Gagarin accumulated most of his piloting hours – long after his supposed orbital flight.

Between 1961 and 1968 Gagarin suffered a series of physical attacks which markedly changed his features including injuries which can only be from assault, battery and violence. It appears the Soviet state had tried a few times to kill him. In 1968 this world famous ‘pilot’, Comrade Top Gun, the man who controlled a large medieval-cannon-ball-missile at 200 miles altitude roaring at 17,000 mph, somehow died in a ‘plane crash’.

Funny that. The world’s foremost pilot could not fly a normal military craft. Of no lasting value and a potential ‘weak link’ in the chain of lies, the Soviets murdered their ‘Communist-peasant hero who had fought the Nazis’. His expiry date had passed.

The dead and sacrificed - a long list

Is the Gagarin story above fantastical? Of course not. The Soviets were practiced murderers, liars and deceivers. The aim was simply to beat the Americans into ‘space’, whatever that definition might mean.

It is well known that the Russians sent cosmonauts including women, into deep space as experiments. Yet this is never discussed. Their cries of terror were picked up by ham operators in Switzerland, Italy and Hungary in the 1950s and 60s as they were incinerated. The Russians cremated animals (including famously, Laika the street dog), along with innocent men and women to test rockets, crafts, material and the radiation levels of real space. The Soviets flung them into the upper atmosphere as test objects and murdered them.

NASA would have known about this and understood by the mid-1960s the impossibility of sending craft with humans more than 400 miles above the surface. This would have further galvanised the motion picture agenda. The Russians, like NASA, have their own demons to hide.

List of official Soviet ‘space’ flights and deaths, with the American efforts added.

· 1957: Alexei Ledovskikh (dead)

· 1958: Serenti Shaborin (dead)

· 1959: Andrei Mitkov (dead)

· 1960: Ivan Katshur (Sept) (dead)

· 1960: Piotr Dolgoff (Oct) (dead)

· 1960: Sputnik VI (Dec.) (persons unknown, dead)

· 1960: Alexis Grassiov (Dec.) (dead)

· 1961: ‘Voices from space’ (Jan, picked up by ham operators) (dead)

· 1961: ‘Sounds, breathing, heartbeat’ (Jan, picked up by ham operators) (dead)

· 1961: Valentin Bondarenko crash, hospitalisation (died)

· 1961: Vlad Ilyushin orbital flight and crash (April 7) (alive, injured)

· 1961: Gagarin, Vostok I, ‘orbital flight’ (April 12) (success) (died/murdered in 1968)

· 1961: Alan Shepard suborbital (May 5)

· 1961: Alexis Belokoniov (May 15) (dead)

· 1961: Voices of 2 males, 1 female cosmonaut (May 17) (dead)

· 1961: Female cosmonaut, cry for help (May 23) (dead)

· 1961: Grissom in suborbital space (July 21)

· 1961: Gherman Titov, Vostok 2, orbital (August 6) (dead)

· 1962: John Glenn, orbital (Feb 21)

From the above list there appears to be a lot of activity and energy between 1957 and 1962 at the height of the ‘space race’ - and a lot of dead people. Prestige, power, and money were all at risk during these years. There is a long list of sacrificed men and women before one arrives at Gagarin and quite a few after as well, especially if the list is extended by a few years.

Titov’s orbital flight in Vostok 2, a full 16 months after Gagarin’s ‘success’, failed and he was killed. Why would Vostok 1 succeed and Vostok 2 fail? The simplest explanation is that Vostok 2 was not staged. It is probable that Titov was just another human sacrifice to the god of Sovietism. He was murdered to highlight Gagarin’s first orbital ‘flight’.

It is also likely that the complete list of those murdered or deemed expendable is many times longer and more depressing. ‘Comrade, what are a few dozen or even a few hundred cosmonaut eggs, to make the Soviet omelette?’

The Ilyushin illusion, his death 5 days before Gagarin’s fraud

The Soviets have scrubbed Illyushin from cosmonaut history. A mere 5 days before Gagarin’s ‘journey’ Ilyushin crash-landed in China, amid equipment, electronics and general systems failure. He was badly injured, in shock and had to be treated by the Chinese. The Soviets viewed this as a failure and the remediation was to deploy Gagarin’s stunt and airbrush Illyushin from their space story.

There is a modern cult of Ilyushin fanatics who argue that he was the first in orbital space. There is no evidence whatsoever to support this claim. In fact there is almost no record or details of his flight. All that is known is the crash landing in China, in a vessel much like Gagarin’s, hundreds of miles from the Soviet ‘landing zone’.

Unlike Gagarin, Ilyushin was apparently a highly skilled pilot with thousands of hours of flight experience. His failure is remarkable, juxtaposed as it is against Gagarin’s ‘success’ a mere 5 days later. Ilyushin’s hardware and system failed. One of the Soviet’s most talented pilots crashed. Yet we are to believe that the peasant-amateur Gagarin, 5 days later, climbed into the same large cannon ball, went into orbital space and executed a perfect landing near his local air force base.

The Russian Capricorn One

In reality, the Soviets packaged up Gagarin to replace the Ilyushin failure and created a movie scene. Gagarin was likely dropped from a plane, his hours of parachuting practice bearing fruit, and the capsule was similarly burned, shot out from a plane near to the supposed pre-determined landing zone, further proving Russian exactitude and skill in orbital-aeronautics with the uncanny ability to land a capsule close to the tageted landing zone. Ilyushin’s crash landing in China could now be ignored.

Only a few photos need be taken. One of the scorched cannon ball which ‘proves’ it re-entered Earth’s atmosphere, but which really indicates a certain death for any creature it carried inside (where were the heat shields Yuri?). Two edited photos of Gagarin supposedly in the capsule (one is taken on a bus, a second in a studio). Some broken comms in the middle of the ‘flight’, controlled by Moscow to be added as a veneer. Pre-recorded descriptions of landmarks and countries Vostok 1 mostly did not pass over in its fictitious journey added colour and plausibility.

Unprofessional, rushed, improvised, it was still good enough to convince the masses that the Soviets had climbed into space, though many Western journalists at the time were extremely sceptical. NASA’s manipulation of imagery would be far more complicated and expertly rendered. NASA had 8 years to prepare the Apollo material using the Gagarin fraud as a baseline inspiration.

Why the Gagarin fraud?

The Soviets must have known that the Americans would soon launch Shepard, their hero-navigator and Grissom, into suborbital space and maybe beyond.

Soviet spies probably informed the Kremlin that the Americans were soon planning a believable PR coup of their own and that time was of the essence (in actual fact it is highly unlikely that Shepard and Grissom were in the payloads of their flights, the Americans most likely did a ‘Capricorn One’, covered in the next post).

The Russians therefore had to act. It was April 1961 or bust.

The Soviets probably expected Illyushin to do enough to convince the world that space was attained. But obviously he failed, which is why he is airbrushed out of history. In a rushed panic they pulled the Gagarin ruse and the sheeple, via the ever pliant media, bought it.

The Americans were caught unawares. They likely knew it was a fraud but what in reality could they do except launch their own ‘orbital mission’ and create a massive new industry with all the benefits and payoffs that entails? The strategy would be simple: give the Russkies the 200 mile ‘first in space’ claim and NASA would ‘land men on the moon’ and the Gagarin fraud will fade into memory.

Shepard the Profit

For the Americans and especially the US military-space complex, Gagarin’s journey, was fortuitous and a godsend of money and opportunity.

Manna, in the form of unlimited funding, began to rain down from heaven Einstein’s spacetime and ‘vacuum’.

This was especially true after Shepard was purportedly launched into the suborbit just a few weeks after the Gagarin mission. Shepard’s May 5, 1961 suborbital ‘mission’ saved NASA and restored ‘confidence’ in the USA. Shepard was feted in Washington by the President and 250,000 citizens as a conquering Caesar. He would later play golf ‘on the moon’ as the leader of Apollo 14.

Shortly after the Shepard jaunt and just six weeks after Gagarin’s faux-journey, President Kennedy announced the Americans would land on the moon by the end of the decade and that money was no obstacle. An empire was birthed, and the money looting and laundering began. Who said the medieval era was not carried over into the ‘modern’?

Bottom Line: Pharisees and money changers

The Americans must have known that Gagarin’s epic journey was a fraud, but to criticise the scam would negate a new empire worth $200 billion in today’s money with all the enrichment, grift and graft that entails. If NASA did pull a Capricorn One with Shepard and Grissom they hardly had the moral imperative to cry foul. And why bother? The Russkies might be useful if Kennedy’s mission to the moon ran into problems and the Americans needed to create yet another fiction and have the Russians, who were saturated with their own space frauds and murders, play along.

Irony of ironies. The current ‘Western’ loathing of all things ‘Russian’ and its Russophobia neglects to remember that it was the Russians who really kicked off the space-race-con and were the genesis for the Apollo film production - one of the most cherished icons of the ‘we did it and we are superior’ age, whoever ‘we’ might be. You the true believer did nothing except consume, believe, regurgitate and follow.

If the Gagarin fraud was not perpetrated, it is hard to imagine NASA receiving the political and financial support to produce a ‘moon landing’ (film) and what has become the space arm of the US military-and-money laundering complex.

As Armstrong might have wheezed; “one small and poorly constructed fraud for the Russians; one gigantic and massive money laundering operation for the Americans (not to mention claims to technological pre-eminence and world domination).”

The Americans went all-in and full hog, with the space-race-con. They dropped 12 men on a realistic-enough looking film set, told the world it was the moon, and made it impossible for the Russians, or the Chinese to respond. Game, set, match.

But now they are screwed. NASA can babble all it wants about zooming off to Mars. They are going nowhere except to their fantasy worlds in CGI and AI.

Tempus Fugit. Memento fraudatio.

All hail.

===

The Apollo Moon 'landings'. Were the moon landings staged and filmed? A compendium of material and questions.

Next posts:

1-We will go through why the Grissom and Shepard flights are most likely as fraudulent as Gagarin’s. Glenn’s is also highly suspect. Patterns emerge which connect 1961 to 1969.

2-The Langley Research Centre, its crane, simulations and the use of simulators to fake a landing.

nb: NASA’s rather ridiculous photos from ‘the moon’ are not even the main problem with their claim of a lunar landing. Quite obviously given the crude camera tech, carbon-based-film, and the lunar environment, no photos of any quality whatsoever could have been taken, let alone the studio perfect frames we are presented with, on the ‘lunar surface’. The fact that we have frame-perfect shots is proof enough of a fraud.

But it is also the 100 other scientific objections that could be used in court to convince a jury that NASA went nowhere above 200 miles from the surface in the 1960s and early 1970s (more likely 10-40 miles in altitude). The compendium of real scientific objections to the moon landing can be found here including the pervasive and persistent psychological reasons for unequivocally supporting NASA’s narrative.

======

Some sources you cannot read because only a moron ‘denies’ Gagarin’s epic flight or the moon landings….

A. Popov Phd, ‘The Joint Hoax?’, 2018. Aulis Link

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/science/space/8416561/Soviet-Union-lied-about-1961-Yuri-Gagarin-space-mission.html

https://falsificationofhistory.co.uk/first-man-in-space-a-provable-fraud/

https://falsehistory.net/the-russian-cosmonaut-hoax/

https://www.rbth.com/history/331849-before-gagarin-not-first-space

https://sci.space.history.narkive.com/jZq0d5ld/fraud-in-gagarin-s-flight-record-claims-fai-doesn-t-care

Bill Kaysing, We never went to the Moon: America’s $30 billion swindle, 2002 (disorganised, photo copied notes, some good material, some bad material).

Gerhard Kowalski, The Gagarin story. The truth about the flight of the world’s first cosmonaut, 2000.

Harro Zimmer, The Red orbit. Glory and misery of Russian space travel, 1996.

Istvan Nemere, Gagarin a cosmic lie, 1990.

James Oberg, Uncovering Soviet disasters, 1988.

Marc Eliot, Walt Disney: Hollywood’s Dark Prince, 1991.

Matthias Grunder, SOS in space, Breakdowns, problems, and catastrophes in manned space travel, 2000.

Ralph Rene, NASA mooned America, 1992 (somewhat more professional and readable than Kaysing’s work, some good logical objections to the moon landing narrative, needed a good editor)

Virgil Grissom, Gemini. A Personal Account of Man’s venture into space, 1968, [he was murdered in Jan. 1967 by NASA].

(Grissom - ardent critic and one of those guys who wanted to know all the details and analysed every inch of the craft and module. A highly focused, troublesome sort. Grissom had a long history dating back to 1961, of being at odds with NASA ‘leadership’. He knew that Apollo was going nowhere and said so publicly.

Grissom was famously murdered on Jan 27, 1967, along with his crew by that good-old-stand-by ‘electrical failure’, the same ‘wiring ignition failure’ which caused a massive inferno on the roof of Notre Dame cathedral during Easter 2019 (coincidence of course), 2 weeks after Saint Sulpice, Paris’ 2^nd largest church, was arsoned and barely saved (just a fire-cidence).

Grissom and his crew were incinerated in a gruesome murder scene that must have took more than 1 hour to play out. 100% oxygen was pumped into the capsule while it sat on the landing pad, the module was stuffed full of velcro to provide flammable material, an ignition switch failure ignited a firestorm and the 3 men were barbequed over a long period of time.

Our atmosphere is 20% oxygen, 100% levels would need a very small, infinitesimal spark to ignite a fire. It was just an ‘accident’ of course according to NASA, those smartest guys evah, who effortlessly landed and retrieved 12 men from the lunar surface, but had problems with ignition switches inside immobile hardware on a launch pad, just 30 months before Apollo 11. Whatever guys.)