The failures of Einstein's GTR and STR theologies. Around and around you go, lost in the fantasy world of endless maths.
Retrograde philosophies which have retarded and distorted science and inquiry.
“Arago submitted the matter to the test of experiment (in 1810) and concluded that the light coming from any star behaves in all cases of reflexion and refraction precisely as it would if the star were situated in the place which it appears to occupy in consequence of aberration, and the earth were at rest; so that the apparent refraction in a moving prism is equal to the absolute refraction in a fixed prism.” (E. T. Whittaker, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Dublin University Press, Longmans, Green and Co., 1910, p. 116)
The Arago failure in 1810 to find a moving Earth, was a galvanizing impetus for Copernicans to find a solution to the travesty of not being able to mechanically measure the movement of this planet. Contrary to myth, not since the time of Copernicus or Galileo had mechanical proof for the mobility of this planet ever been manufactured. Enter the Relativists and the Einstotle, the Jewish theologian and philosopher, skilled with confusionist maths.
Whirling Galaxies
The current cosmological model, based on Relativity and the Big Bang is most certainly invalid. Newton, not the Einstotle, was far more accurate in his cosmology and he had little to say about endless expansion, fantastic galaxial speeds or the phantoms of ‘dark energy’ and ‘dark matter’ (another term for the aether, a word which cannot never be uttered).
Newtonian physics, with its flaws, is still the basis of cosmology. A main problem with the hermetic Newton, is the ‘mechanisation’ or ‘clockwork’ model of the universe. This is an impossibility in reality and is a philosophical not a scientific contention.
Newton, after the formulation of the general principle of gravity of all masses, was puzzled as to why the universe had not gravitationally collapsed. He surmised that our solar system’s cosmological stability was based on the gravitational force of the Sun acting on planets and was countermanded by the centrifugal inertial force of planets orbiting the Sun.
These inertial forces were both real and ‘fictitious’ meaning that they were difficult if not impossible to locate and measure. Today such forces are called the Coriolis and Euler. They are real and lie outside of Relativity and Big Bang theory.
In 1925 the excitable Relativist Edwin Hubble ‘discovered’ galaxies and postulated incorrectly that their ‘redshift’ light emission meant they were moving away from the Earth at some 800.000 km per second. We have commented on this substack why the ‘Hubble constant’ is magnificently inconstant, subject to revision and trending to zero. Hubble’s ‘law’ is anything but.
In 1926 there was Lindblad’s ‘discovery’ of galaxy rotation. It was prognosticated that not only did the Earth revolve around the Sun, but that our solar system revolved around the centre of our Milky Way galaxy, which possesses a diameter between 100.000 and 300.000 light years, and which must in turn revolve around the centre of the universe. Thus was born our modern conception of endless rotations and expansion at high speed.
Gospel Theories as Rubbish (GTR)
Einstein’s general theory or GTR was proposed in 1915 to compensate for the incoherence of Special Relativity which left out gravity and could not explain light speed variance. STR is a noxious mathematical construction without any physical proof. It is premised on the faulty and corrupted interpretation of the 1887 Michelson Morley experiment which found no movement of this planet, but an aether wind of roughly 5-8 km per second. Einstein and others used ‘Relativity’ as a means to explain this failure.
General Relativity emerged from STR, where Einstein added in the aether to GTR (missing in STR); and developed speculations about a possible relativity of acceleration and equating that with gravity (unproven, absurd) within a spacetime dimension which is also false and impossible. However, Lindblad’s discovery in 1926 of ‘whirling galaxies’ and even galaxies being created de novo, meant the end of GTR which can explain neither phenomena.
Newton’s far-sighted belief has proven correct, with the minor change that all the stars of the universe known to Newton (also to Einstein), rotate around the common ‘power center’ of the Milky Way Galaxy. Modern astronomy is finding out that the universal barycenter, or this power-center, is our own solar system. This is never discussed.
As stated above, Hubble’s ‘redshift’ does not mean a rapid receding movement from the Earth, nor long ages, nor can ‘redshift’ tell us where the galaxy is moving to or why. Blueshifting, where Andromeda for example is on a collision course with our Milky Way, disproves ‘redshifting’. The first blue-shifted or red-shifted stars observed were Aldebaran, Arcturus and Betelgeuse in 1894 by J. E. Keeler. Blueshifting is rarely discussed yet it is a known phenomena, and older than Einsteinian ‘Relativity’.
In the past 20 years, as evidenced by heretics such as Halton Arp, it has been discovered that galaxies form ‘filaments’ in weblike super clusters and move at curved paths along these filaments. The galaxies might be moving, expanding, oscillating in place, or blueshifting toward us. The data is all over the place. This means that the Big Bang is wrong. It is not a unilinear relationship of accelerated expansion between galaxies and systems.
Gravitational Fields
The current explanation of ‘gravitational fields’ is largely based on Van der Waals’ experiments (1910 Nobel Prize) on the existence of mutual attractive forces between the molecules and atoms. In this theory, gravity emerges from a magnetic field. At the molecular level the theory suggests that gravity emanates with a random thermal rotating (spinning) movement of a ‘rotating dipole (2 poles) and multipole electrostatic fields (energy around a magnet for example)’.
In plain language gravitational fields in GTR are illustrated as a fundamental force of attraction between masses. These attractions might actually arise from the very small, fluctuating electric forces found in spinning charged particles (like electrons and atomic nuclei) within matter.
Yet somehow, in GTR, Van der Waals’ concepts are transformed into a demagogic physical and philosophical phantasm of a curvature of non-material notion of space and time!
Subsequently, GTR proposed that gravitational waves from large gravity-mass bodies, oscillating in merged space and time, created the thermal electromagnetic radiation of the individual atoms and elementary particles from which these large gravity mass objects are composed. No one has any idea what causes GTR’s gravitational field or how it acts. It is simply a geometrical tensor calculation. It is wrong. This was a continuation of the holy mystery of time dilation found in STR, where the mutual velocity of body and light is always constant and that masses approaching the speed of light dilated along their length (also wrong).
In discussing gravity and radiation we can say that ‘relic radiation’ (or cosmic microwave background radiation or CMB) is just a manifestation of so-called gravitational waves. CMB, even in the ‘orthodox’ standard model, disproves the Big Bang. Yet there are other explanations for ‘gravity’ and radiation.
Background radiation for example can be explained as the broad spectrum very low electromagnetic radiation frequency flow, which arises from the individual atoms of large bodies of mass, rotating in our solar system, the Milky Way and other galaxies. This is called ‘cyclotron radiation’, or radiation from particles moving in a spiral or circular pattern (eg. electromagnetic radiation (light, radio waves, X-rays, etc.)
Relativity explains none of this in reality. In space and around our own planet, we see this phenomenon in ionised plasma, emitted by our Sun, which hits our poles (Northern and Southern lights). There is no reason to invoke the magic of a merged spacetime dimension nor endless billions-trillions of years. Other more practical explanations exist for CMB.
Either way, whether you use the standard model for CMB, or use other more sensible theories to explain radiation and gravity, Relativity and the Big Bang are disproven.
Black Holes?
Beyond gravitational fields, GTR then introduced the Black Hole concept which claims that nothing can escape a singularity of energy and gravity. Black Holes can be identified upon the basis of their gravitational interaction in otherwise boundless distances. The Black Holes are allegedly placed in the centre of galaxies, by a massive gravity field which keeps the rest of galaxy together.
Do Black Holes even exist? If quantum mechanics is right, Black Holes cannot be valid. The ‘Big Bang’ explosion supposedly emanated from just such a ‘Black Hole’. But how was that singularity formed in the first place? From what?
A simple and logical question would be the following: how does the gravity force itself, or the gravity field of the Black Hole, escape within boundless distance beyond an event horizon? How do space and time self-create? This has never been proven and is impossible.
GTR claims that Black Holes can produce gravitational waves that transport energy to boundless distances in the form of gravitational radiation, a genus of radiant energy similar to electromagnetic radiation. We discussed above why this is wrong. Electromagnetic radiation and light are the same. To get around this objection the ‘graviton’ was invented.
A graviton is a particle within the unproven and ridiculous, ‘spacetime curvature’, which may move at ‘greater than light speed’. However, we are also told that light speed is fixed and invariant…..so it is unclear what they mean by light speed. The elastic speed for the graviton apparently allows gravity to act beyond the ‘horizon’ and boundaries of its galaxy.
Some obvious questions: Why did the initial expansion at far higher than 'the invariant of light speed’, slow down? How is light speed constant but apparently inconstant? How does that impact the calculations of universal or Earthly ages?
The graviton has never been proven to exist.
Within Relativity, using the multiple of speed and time, we are not able to measure the traveled paths of light beams because an increase in velocity follows a dilation of time and length contraction. This results in a deceleration of velocity itself! Relativity argues against itself.
Once again we find ourselves in a typical mysterious Einsteinian-tautological-druidic-circle, where no basic unit of quantity and no basic reference frame is defined. Cue the virgin sacrifices. Consider:
In Relativity, all basic units of quantities and their relevant reference frames are changing according to their ratio to the velocity of light,
But no absolute reference frame exists for the velocity of light,
Therefore no measurement and traceability can be established.
And this is called ‘Science’!
Bending Light proves nothing
Modern physics rejects both common sense and observation. Eddington’s fraud in 1919, which ‘proved’ that the bending of starlight around the Sun ‘proved’ Relativity, was even for ‘The Science’, a manipulation of massive proportions. This is called ‘gravitational lensing’ which sounds sciency.
According to the fundamental experimental knowledge of optics since Newton, we know that light curves when it passes closely around the edge of any object of any mass. It has nothing to do with Relativity’s maths or its non-existent ‘4th dimension of spacetime’. Light bends due to gravity and the aether.
Nikola Tesla (1856-1943) knew Relativity was a fraud and wrote in the New York Herald Tribune, on September 11, 1932:
“I hold that space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can have no properties. Of properties we can only speak when dealing with matter filling the space. To say that in the presence of large bodies space becomes curved is equivalent to stating that something can act upon nothing. I, for one, refuse to subscribe to such a view.”
Tesla claimed that Einstein’s Relativity, which discarded the aether, was entirely wrong and he proved that no vacuum (void space, a nothingness) exists. Tesla asserted that all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the electro-magnetic aether and the indispensable function it plays in phenomena are futile. He further declared that there is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment (electro-magnetic, dynamic energy). Tesla the practical engineer, was right.
Bottom Line
GTR and its ancestor STR are junk science. They explain nothing and are refuted by facts, evidence and physics. We know that:
Light speed is variant (‘the science’ admits to this as given above)
Motion of an observer will affect object velocity and measurement (rejected by STR and GTR)
An aether (or whatever word you want to use) exists (STR dismissed the aether, GTR put an amorphous aether back into space)
Light bends due to gravity and the aether (or plasma)
Black Holes are illogical theoretical constructions without proof
GTR cannot explain gravity, STR leaves gravity out entirely
Masses do not lengthen along their sides at high velocities but simply expand
Background radiation does not have to be a relic from the ‘Big Bang’ but radiative energy from ongoing natural processes
Redshifting does not mean long ages or recessionary speed
Blueshifting or galaxies moving toward us, disproves the mantra about redshifting
When he turned 70, the Einstotle wrote a letter to his friend and evangelical disciple Maurice Solovine. It is dated 28 March 1949 and reads in part:
"You imagine that I look back on my life's work with calm satisfaction. But from nearby it looks quite different. There is not a single concept of which I am convinced that it will stand firm, and I feel uncertain whether I am in general on the right track.”
The Einstotle knew that his philosophies and mathematical theories were without merit. The industry called Scientism, also knows that Relativity is doomed. Paradigms are built on money, power, prestige and control. It will take a lot of work, effort, morality and inevitable violence, to dismantle the destructive philosophical industries created by Einstein. Mistakes have consequences.
All hail.
Sources
E. Hubble, The observational approach to cosmology, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1937
A. K. T. Assis at. all, Hubble’s Cosmology: From a Finite Expanding Universe to a Static Endless Universe, (arXiv:0806.4481v2, 2011)
J. D. Bjorken, Theoretical ideas on high-energy inelastic electron-proton scattering, SLAC pub. 571, March 1969
P. Sujak, Big Crash of Basic Concepts of Physics of the 20th Century?, Proceedings of the Natural Philosophy Alliance, 20th Annual Conference of the NPA, Maryland, 2013, http://vixra.org/abs/1108.0017
Nikola Tesla, New York Herald Tribune, New York. 11, Sept. 1932
Brilliant - thanks
An illustration of a reality that doesn’t exist !!!
The more I read and study the more I’m convinced that what we think is reality is nothing more than a fantasy based on assumptions.