Tidal flows and more issues for the Standard Model. Newton, Laplace, Darwin - their maths are wrong. What a surprise!
For 300 hundred years the Standard Model has failed to explain tidal flows. They don't follow the Moon God's precession. The aether provides a simpler, mechanical explanation. Anathema.
“The effects observed during the solar eclipses of 1954 and 1959 are inexplicable by the classical theories of gravitation and relativity... They demonstrate the existence of a new field of action, an anisotropic space, where the movement of celestial bodies physically alters the kinetic baseline of the Earth.” — Maurice Allais (Nobel Laureate in Economics and Physicist, summarizing the Allais Anomaly)
“Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the Ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.” — Nikola Tesla (Pioneer of alternating current and fluid mechanics, 1932)
Which model?
Allais and Tesla are never taught in school or university. Tesla harnessed the aether and collected ‘free wireless energy’. He conducted tens of thousands of experiments. He invented the modern grid. He demolished a building in NYC using sound vibrations. How many experiments did Einstein perform again? Oh, zero? Fascinating. But of course you follow Messiah Einstein. Laity in the ‘science religion’ receive bona fides and privileges - no matter how wrong or stupid the theology might be.
Allais and Tesla disprove scientistic canonical dogma. This is why they are ignored. This is why no one hears about them. Consider ‘wind’ and the Standard Model we discussed previously. ‘Wind’ or the aether, is what both Allais and Tesla investigated in part. They revealed the Standard Model’s explanation of ‘wind’ to be a fiction.
Now let’s discuss tidal flows, another Fanboy ‘proof’ of the ‘rotating’ Earth and of the magical-druidic properties of that most famous of amen words - ‘gravity’.
We head back to the chapels of Apostle Newton and Messiah Al of the Einstein, the Lord, the giver of sentience. In summary, the standard Newtonian-heliocentric model, explicated through its divine professors, relies on a magical, invisible tether to explain the movement of our oceans. Canonical dogma demands that:
One part of the Standard Model states that the Moon, resting in a dead ‘vacuum’ 238,000 miles away, 1/81 the mass of this planet, uses the amen-word ‘gravity’ (now bow your heads and pray), to reach through the vast void and drag giga-tonnes of water around the Earth every single day. A second explanation, based on the prophecies of the Messiah A-Stone (Ein Stein); the Moon through its very limited mass ‘displaces’ space-time and drags the oceans on this planet.
The volumes involved are unimaginable and the movement, violent. Does the above pass the farmer’s common-sense test?
The gospel of the Standard Model does not make sense if we have a look at the physical mechanics of the oceans or the incredible volume of water being lifted and pushed (a tide is water being lifted and heaved, they are not ‘flows’ like a river current). If we consider the real nature of tidal flows, we will see the massive anomalies the establishment tries to hide with their arcane maths.
What Do We Mean By Tidal Flows?
In the simplest terms, according to oceanographic science, tidal flows are the cyclical rising and falling of the Earth’s oceanic baseline. There are many reasons why water will oscillate against its natural baseline within a container but as usual ‘The Science’ will only allow one answer, one model interpretation.
1. Tidal flows represent a bulk movement of water across the terrestrial plane (i.e. a collective batch process)
2. The establishment attributes this ‘bulk movement’ entirely to the gravitational pull of the Moon (and partially the Sun) pulling the water into a bulge
3. The Earth will ‘rotate’ through this gravitational attraction as well as move in a translation around the Sun
This is what is taught. None of it is proven or even common-sensical. Much of it is disproven.
Volume, Speed
Tidal waves and waves in general are formed of energy and physical matter which might be nano, micro or macro in size. You can see this when you take hold of a carpet and flap it outside to clean off the dirt and debris. A visible wave travels from your hands to the end of the carpet and beyond as the energy wave leaves the carpet and enters the air.
Logically tides work the same way as the waving carpet.
A massive tidal bulge does not mean water is traveling across the ocean pushed by some unknown force or mechanism. The ‘tidal wave’ moves due to pressure sweeping across the ocean, temporarily lifting the water up and down as it passes. Back to the waving carpet.
The volume contained within this ‘wave movement’ is of course rather astounding. Ask yourself if an object 1/81 the mass of this one has the bicep power to move the gigatonnes in question or cause the velocities involved. More on this below. You weigh 80 kg. Do you really believe that a 1 kg object 238.000 miles away is pulling ‘fluid’ over your body? Maybe the critical thinking module needs to be turned on.
· The global ocean covers roughly 361 million square kilometers
· In the deep ocean (before it hits the coasts and amplifies), the passing tidal pressure wave lifts the global water level by an average of 1 meter (roughly 3.2 feet).
· If we multiply 361 million square kilometers by a depth of 1 meter, we get 361,000 cubic kilometers of physically displaced water.
· 361,000 cubic km * 1.025 Gigatonnes/cubic km = 370,000 Gigatonnes
There are 2 tidal flows per day.
We are talking here about 740,000 Gigatonnes of water being displaced – every single day. Does the Moon theory of ‘gravity’ pass your common sense test when looking at the tidal volume involved?
1 Gigatonne is roughly equivalent to strapping together 2700 Empire State Buildings. Even Einstein can do the maths - 2700 x 740.000 is quite a collection of ESB’s. You remember the Empire State building. That was the size of rocket that von Braun said was needed for the Apollo program. The Saturn V was 3% of that volume. But of course you believe they landed on the Moon in 1969. Teacher say, Science say, BBC say.
The amount of water being displaced in daily tidal flows is incomprehensible to our minds. It is equivalent to trying to understand what $40 Trillion in debt means.
What about the velocity? According to oceanography:
· It is estimated that in the open ocean, the tidal wave (the crest of high pressure) travels at roughly 400 to 500 mph.
· The actual physical water in the deep ocean barely moves laterally. The tidal current speed is just a few inches per second.
· Oceanographers state that the water speeds up when the ~500 mph pressure wave hits the shallow continental shelves. At this juncture the water is forced to physically move, creating coastal currents that usually range from 2 to 10 mph (like in the Bay of Fundy, below).
The volume and speed are poignant and clear indications that the standard model of a lunar pull operating in a ‘vacuum’, is nonsense. The tidal flows are all over the place. There is no pattern.
Which direction Chud and what energy?
You should never ask a Standard Model Fanboy about tidal flow direction. They become cross eyed, get their maths mixed up and then assault you in anger. Witness their grief.
In the standard model the sky (and the Moon/Sun) rotates from East to West, therefore the overarching 500 mph pressure wave as outlined above, is swept from East to West.
But…..if you look at a map of actual tidal currents, the water doesn’t flow East to West.
The oceans are trapped in massive continental basins (like the Atlantic basin), the water physically cannot flow continuously.
There must be another system of pressure acting on the water. The flows have nothing to do with the Moon’s precession.
A more logical process is the ‘aetheric’ or medium pressure wave hitting the water, forcing the liquid to swirl in vortices or massive circular current around fixed zero tide zones the standard model calls ‘Amphidromic Points’ (which are empty nodes water will move around).
This is fluid dynamics, which can be confirmed and replicated in a lab, a lake, a whirlpool or the ocean itself.
Now consider the power involved.
The only way to move 370.000 Gigatonnes of water around the Earth is by using Terawatt level energy and force. Because the tide is a pressure wave lifting water rather than a river flowing in one direction, oceanographers measure the tide in mass and kinetic energy. Here again we see the poverty of the Moon-does-it-all-model.
Energy: Now consider the global energy dissipation. A global tidal system must dissipate roughly 3.7 Terawatts of kinetic energy continuously. In simple analogical terms this amount of energy is greater than the entire electrical output of human civilisation, equivalent to 3700 nuclear reactors (we have ~440 nuclear reactors on the planet). This is going on every single day.
Mass: Local Mass calculations will vary on location and time of day. In the Bay of Fundy alone, a single tidal cycle moves 160 billion tonnes of seawater in and out of the basin. That is more than the combined daily flow of all the freshwater rivers on Earth, happening in just one bay, twice a day.
Do you believe that the Moon God has that power? Are you that pagan-religious? Why then don’t the tides follow the Moon deity?
The Bay of Fundy
Tidal patterns are powerful and complex. Regard the Bay of Fundy in Nova Scotia, Canada. While a standard ocean beach might see a tidal shift of 3 to 6 feet, the Bay of Fundy experiences incredible, moraine sized 50-foot tidal shifts every day. Over 320 billion tonnes of seawater flow in and out of the bay during a tide cycle.
Now consider the standard model.
If the Moon’s gravity were a simple, uniform magnet pulling the water, tidal ranges would be relatively uniform across latitudes. But they aren’t.
The water in the Bay of Fundy violently defies the baseline lunar pull. It is anything but uniform and does not align with the overhead path of the Al Lah, the Muslim moon god.
Mathigician Laplace who had to be Replaced with more magic
To explain away anomalies like the Bay of Fundy and the fact that tides frequently do not align with the Moon’s overhead path, the establishment uses Laplace’s Tidal Equations (1776) and variations built on that treatise. These maths were generated in a panic as ‘The Science’ again had to save their poster boy Newton.
At the end I provide a note on why both Newton and Laplace are wrong, the calculations little more than lies, but let’s just accept Laplace’s explanation at face value and walk through them because we like the guy’s name and he wore an impressive wig and tights (don’t all ‘enlightened’ men?).
But first, behold some of the gibberish:
Let’s pause here and have a look at this nonsense. To make this equation balance to zero (the pre determined answer), these mathigicians have to run the observed tidal data through Laplace’s massive sausage maker in Equation 2 (the Laplace tidal operator). But pause dear reader. Have a look at the ingredients they are feeding into that grinder. The math entirely depends on two variables that are wrong or simply assumed:
Omega (The Earth’s rotation rate): They assume the 1,040 mph spin is a physical given. Why? And if you do assume this, you must declare it and provide a control counter example if it is untrue or unproven.
g (Acceleration due to gravity): They assume a Newtonian pulling force. Why? Same problem. This is simply a made up constant. Gravity can never be ‘invariable’ and the Moon is too small to exert any force on this planet. Use your own brain and common sense. Gravity is dependent on multiple forces and variables as discussed elsewhere. It is yet another constant to be manipulated.
Now reflect further. If you ask a Standard Model oceanographer Fanboy what ‘equivalent depth’ means, they will be forced to admit that it is not the actual, physical depth of the ocean. Because the real oceans are too complex, irregular, and mathematically stubborn to fit Laplace’s spinning-globe equation, mathematicians invented h - yet another variable to plug into a software / maths model. No one can explain what the ‘h’ means.
Anyone can play this tautological-maths-game. I can also insert dependent-constants feeding on my undeclared assumptions and world-views and I too can concoct code that you have no idea about, and cannot confirm what it means or if it is real.
Replace Laplace
Laplace and the Standard Model happily admit that the Bay of Fundy is an issue for their framework. They obfuscate and declaim that the Moon’s gravity doesn’t just pull the water directly, instead the water acts like fluid in a bathtub.
In the Bay of Fundy, Laplace and the Standard Model state that the shape of the bay perfectly matches the frequency of the Moon’s pull, creating what is called ‘tidal resonance’, where the water sloshes back and forth, amplifying the wave.
They use complex basin fluid dynamics to explain why the tides lag, rotate around empty nodes (amphidromic points), and completely ignore the Moon’s direct path.
This is business as usual for the Standard Model. Ad hoc explanations, more layers of maths, and misdirection’s to explain phenomena and evidence that contradicts their framework. Laplace, however, was wrong and replaced.
Laplace’s use of fluid dynamics is correct in principle. Sloshing is indeed an observable pattern within fluid dynamics. But the Standard Model incorrectly assigns the Moon within a vacuum to be the engine that begins the process. This is rather absurd and impossible.
A Farmer’s Question to Chud
Farmer Practical enters the conversation and perplexed by all the mathigicianism asks, “Chud boy, I know you are a little stupid, but how does a reasonably small dead rock like the Moon, produce ‘gravity’ whatever that word means and whatever it is; and so much of it that it ‘pulls’ on this planet. Wouldn’t the larger magnet pull the smaller? Isn’t the Earth which is massive the object doing all the pulling Chudly?”
Those farmers. Always asking the simple, tough questions. Well Farmer Practical, it depends on who you believe. If you ask a Scientistic Fanboy they will dump a few tonnes of freshly minted mathematical manure on your head as an answer drowning you in the fecund odour of geometrical nonsense and virtual reality.
The Scientism establishment informs us, the uncouth, shoeless farmers, that a freezing, airless, geologically dead rock with a mass <2% of this planet’s, is somehow ‘bending’ an ‘empty vacuum’ and pulls 740.000 gigatonnes of terrestrial ocean water every day. They demand you believe that ‘mass’ has magical bending properties.
If you believe that you will believe anything. Watch out for the Congolesee bat virus (Ebola).
But Mr Farmer, quite happily, since you are alive and there is life; we do not live in a vacuum. We live in a highly charged aetheric plenum and using your Farmer’s logic we know that a mass of dead material does not sit in ‘nothing’ and that a physical something, cannot bend a non-physical-geometrical-nothing.
The impact of the Moon is simple to explain. The Moon doesn’t pull the Earth’s water using Newtonian magic and Einstein’s manure; it perturbs the vertical dielectric field of the Earth as it passes over.
The Alternative Explanation: Aetheric Displacement
The aetheric swell simulation, something never considered by those who profess profound scientific skills and intelligence:
(This simple graphic depicts a stylised celestial pressure source (the Moon), displacing a dense aetheric medium, creating localised pressure changes and subsequent fluid motion (tidal flows) in the underlying water.)
The above simulation leads to mechanical reality where we can confidently remove the fiction of a vacuum, and insert a dense fluid aether medium. Now tidal flows and their actual behaviour can be easily explained.
In this model the Sun and Moon are not ‘orbs in a void’; they are dense, luminescent nodes sweeping through the toroidal aetheric plenum above us.
Toroidal is a term related to fluid dynamics and indicates ‘donut shaped’ macro and micro pressure systems. It is the main transmission mechanism for energy and fluid transfer, featuring a sink (inward) and an exhaust (outward). It is a 2 stroke engine. It is based on reality not maths.
As the Sun and Moon move, they displace the aetheric fluid, creating massive, sweeping pressure waves and an aetheric wind (Miller, Allais, Consoli). We can infer from this that the oceans are not being pulled by gravity from space from the Moon which is 1/81 the Earth’s mass.
The tidal systems are generated because the gigatonnes of liquid are being pressed and manipulated by the shifting barometric and aetheric pressure systems sweeping overhead.
The Bay of Fundy sloshes not because a ‘rock’ 238,000 miles away is pulling it, but because the local aetheric pressure wave is rhythmically pushing down on the terrestrial basin. This is not only logical and common sensical, but something you can mechanically and physically prove outside or in a lab. Not so with the magic of Newton, A-Stone, Laplace and the Standard Model fanboys, drunk on their mathigician-’transformation’ equations.
Mechanical Interactions
We do not have to guess that the aether interacts with the Earth’s mechanics; physicists have measured it.
In 1954, Nobel Laureate Maurice Allais recorded the ‘Allais Anomaly’. During a solar eclipse, his paraconical pendulums shifted wildly. Standard vacuum gravity could not explain this kinetic disruption. The alignment of the Sun and Moon physically interrupted the aetheric currents enveloping the Earth. These same current generate tidal flows.
Physicist Maurizio Consoli audited the modern Michelson-Morley style interferometer experiments. His work concludes that a physical vacuum condensate (an aether drift) exists, and its kinetic variations perfectly align with diurnal and planetary cycles. These measurements prove that the Moon is not a gravity-magnet in a void. It is a physical object disrupting a fluid medium, and that disruption registers on Earth. This is far more sensible an explanation than the magic of Newton and Laplace.
Bottom Line
We know that the tides do not follow the Moon because the Moon is incapable of pulling on the Earth and the tidal flows are all over the place. A more sensible view is that the tides are the physical breathing of the Earth’s oceans as they react to the rhythmic pressure of the celestial vortex rotating above them. Back to your Gaia worship and holism. Don’t forget to buy a Tesla.
We also know that today; to predict the tide at a specific location or beach, scientists don’t use the Moon’s gravity.
Did you know that? Did you know that the Moon’s gravity is not used to measure tidal flows? Did you know that Newton’s and Laplace’s mathematical models are a nonsense and ignored?
To measure tidal flows in real life ‘the science’ puts a physical measuring stick in the water, records the actual physical sloshing of the aetheric pressure wave for a month, and then plugs dozens of local fudge factors called empirical ‘harmonic constants’ (see critique below at the end), into a computer to make the math match reality. So much for Newton, Laplace and Darwin.
But of course you know this already, given this was taught in ‘school’!
You had debating teams in ‘science-class’ one group advocating the Standard Model framework of Moon and gravity worship, mathigician-equations with stuff happens; the other team looking at mechanical and physical proofs and evidence. You remember. Teacher Quicky-Quack was there as an impartial judge. Teacher emphasised that we need experimental proofs not just pretty math equations. Teacher said such debates were great training to instil critical thinking and independent judgement, both highly valued in the workplace.
Or maybe not. Maybe Teacher Quicky-Quack glided over ‘tidal flows’ in 15 minutes, could not answer basic questions, had no idea where Nova Scotia was located and told you to memorise Laplace for the exam.
All hail.
NB Short history lesson on Newton, Laplace and the obfuscation/lies on tidal flows
By the late 1700s, the establishment had a massive problem. Newton had proposed the Equilibrium Theory of Tides, canonical gospel, settled ‘science’, a consensus, which claimed the Moon pulled the ocean into two massive, static bulges, and the Earth simply rotated through them.
Problem: Newton’s model completely failed empirical observation. Shock news! Under Newton’s math, high tide should happen exactly when the Moon is directly overhead.
In reality, it almost never does. High tide can lag by hours or even days. In some places, there is only one tide a day; in others, the water doesn’t move at all. You can sit along the Thames on any day and prove this.
Roll out the Laplace Patch (1776): The Laplace software upgrade attempted to save Newton but in effect displaced his theory. He knew the Earth wasn’t covered by an infinitely deep, uniform ocean. He created the Dynamic Theory of Tides, introducing the fluid dynamics of water moving across a rotating sphere and crashing into landmasses. This of course disproved Newton’s original theory.
Laplace’s equations are at best ‘half right’ and given that overall he was wrong, he too had to be replaced.
What he gets right.
Laplace’s math regarding how a fluid behaves when trapped in a shallow basin on a rotating surface (another assumption which is undeclared), is actually really good. He correctly mapped out the Coriolis effect (another word for the aether), on water and the existence of ‘Amphidromic Points’ (zero-tide nodes). Ironically the Coriolis disproves the Moon God theory.
What the tights-wearing-thin armed-Frenchman got wrong.
Laplace mathematically hard-coded Newton’s ‘lunar vacuum gravity’ as the primary forcing engine that starts the water moving. There is no proof of this, he supplied no evidence nor mechanical experimentation. By way of analogy it would be similar to someone building an abstract maths model of a car but not explaining how it moved or who was driving it.
We know Laplace is wrong when we consider ‘Harmonic Analysis’.
If Laplace’s gravity-based equations actually worked, oceanographers could simply take the mass of the Moon, run Laplace’s math, and perfectly predict the tide anywhere on Earth. They cannot do this.
By the 1860s, the establishment realised Laplace’s equations were too idealised and completely failed to predict actual local tides. Another fail.
So, William Thomson (Lord Kelvin) and George Darwin, son of that fraud Chuckie, had to invent a mathematical cover-up called ‘Harmonic Analysis’. The very name brings tears to your eyes it is so sciency. These are the usual fudge constants ‘The Science’ rolls out to make their equations appear balanced, the theory rational. Dark Energy, Dark Matter and gravity are other fudge constants they use in the most ‘liberal’ of ways.
Because the pure gravity math failed, Kelvin and Darwin decided to break the tide down into dozens of fictional, imaginary ‘partial tides’ (called tidal constituents). These are mathematical constants to get the equations to balance to match the phenomena. These are now used today to plug into software programs and backmapped to match reality.
As with the Laplace chimera, there is no provenance for these ‘partial tides’ nor motor and they certainly have nothing to do with the Moon’s precession - which is still the claim one find’s in textbooks and parroted by ‘experts’ today.
It is incredible but there you have it. Another Standard Model failure that no one knows about and the failure is offered as ‘proof’ of the Earth’s rotation and its serene, stable, 60.000 mph glide around the Sun God.
All hail.
Sources no one reads
Allais, M. (1959) ‘Should the Laws of Gravitation be Reconsidered?’, Aero/Space Engineering, 18(9), pp. 46-52. (‘Allais Anomaly’ proves that lunar/solar alignments cause physical, kinetic disruptions on Earth that Newtonian vacuum gravity completely fails to predict.)
Consoli, M. and Costanzo, E. (2004) ‘The motion of the Solar System and the Michelson-Morley experiment’, Il Nuovo Cimento B, 119(4), pp. 393-410. (Consoli’s modern audit of ether-drift experiments. He argues that a physical medium (vacuum condensate) exists and that we can detect its kinetic shifts, providing the modern framework for aetheric pressure.)
Darwin, G.H. (1898) The Tides and Kindred Phenomena in the Solar System. London: John Murray. (Standard model’s historical baseline. Darwin (son of that erstwhile plagiariser, confusionist and idiotic philospher Chuckie, another dandy who never worked) wrote a text on how gravity allegedly pulls the tides, setting up the exact narrative we have just dismantled. Scientific gibberish runs in the family. The son learning from dad. The son trying to be as relevant as his mentally unbalanced father.)
Laplace, P.S. (1776) ‘Recherches sur plusieurs points du système du monde’, Mémoires de l’Académie Royale des Sciences, 89, pp. 75-182. (The origin of Laplace’s Tidal Equations where it is stated that the Moon doesn’t pull the water perfectly, and that the establishment had to rely on complex terrestrial fluid dynamics (basin sloshing) to save Newton’s broken model. Inane and tautological maths. Quel surpris.)
Lodge, O. (1909) The Ether of Space. London: Harper & Brothers. (Lodge establishes the extreme density and pressure of the aether. This entails a shifting celestial body (the Moon), which displaces or enhances the aetheric current, would create massive pressure waves capable of pressing down on the oceans.)
Pugh, D.T. (1987) Tides, Surges and Mean Sea-Level: A Handbook for Engineers and Scientists. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. (A modern oceanography standard. Specific terrestrial mechanics of the Bay of Fundy (resonance) and amphidromic points, proving that the standard model relies entirely on terrestrial fluid mechanics, not just space vacuums.)
Wonder what else they got wrong
I really enjoy every one of your posts. You have brought more understanding about the world around us that anyone I've ever followed. You don't tell us how things work exactly, you tell us why they can't work the way we've been told.
I can't believe you don't have way more people subscribed to unstabbinated.