19th century Smallpox vaccine efficacy and data fraud. $cientism in the age of Jenner.
Claims which make no sense presaging the Corona scamdemic stab claims. British government's own 19th century makes the claim of smallpox vaccine efficacy a lie.
Data fraud is a central tenet of $cientism. Blind the masses with ‘science’. Corrupt data sources to present a narrative. Don’t allow audits or access to the source data (Globaloney-warming, Evolution, and other religions are famous for this). Hide the declines, inclines or any data which challenges or worse disproves the narrative. The smallpox quackcination story is no different.
Was smallpox as ‘destructive’ as we are told? Was it the raging malady, which would kill 30, 40, 50% of children? Or was the actual death rate like the modern flu, less than 1% even for those most at risk? Was the actual smallpox death rate far less than 1 in 1000? And if it was, why is that an ‘epidemic’? What does that word even mean? Or is ‘epidemic’ used to frighten, cajole, inject and profit? Smallpox affected mostly slums and areas of poverty reeking with filth and unclean water. That might have been a clue about how to stop the disease.
Most of the data sources related to smallpox mortality from the 19th century, with those wonderful and quite fraudulent graphs showing a marked decline as soon as Jenner rolled out his profitable cowpus injection beginning in 1796, emanate from one single source: Edwardes (1902) A concise history of small-pox and vaccination in Europe. H.K. Lewis. Available online here.
All online artefacts (world in data etc) and school textbooks will have their nicely coloured graphs using this source and only this source. It is curious that one source controls them all, yet few bother to read this source and critique it.
If you read through Edwardes’ book, there is no proof whatsoever that the data from 1796 to 1838 is accurate (more on this in another post). In fact, the sources used in most cases cannot be verified and the claims made using that data would fail a statistical analysis. Yet this book is the foundation for everything you have been taught about smallpox and how the stabbination reduced mortality! An example is below. But let’s assume Edwardes’ data is valid. If we simply accept Edwardes’ analysis, we see that the UK government’s shrill and livid pronoucements of vaccine efficacy, based on their very own data, which are trumpeted ad infinitum from 1820 onwards, are false, misleading, mendacious and absurd.
https://ourworldindata.org/smallpox The sources at the end list Edwardes as the reference material for the 19th century. By 1840 ~80% of the UK population has been stabbed yet epidemics occur in the 1840s, 1850s, 1870s and into the 20th century.
Quackcines did not reduce mortality
The first country to stab for smallpox was England, starting in 1796, with quackcines made mandatory in 1853, though regulations and laws before 1853 (example 1840 given below) were in place to force parents to quackcinate their new-borns. There is little proof that the smallpox quackcines resulted in decreased mortality, indeed it appears the mortality rate actually increased.
Sanitation projects and slum clearances starting in the 1840s had a far greater role in disease reduction, than cowpus injections. Epidemics still raged post 1838. The quacked died as well as the unquacked. Many variables would have been in play, none of them acknowledged by the vaccine religious. The actual death rate from smallpox was small in any event, never more than 1/1000 or 0.1% and often 0.02% or below. This was true before 1838 as it was after. Why is a death rate of 0.1% an epidemic?
Before his ascension to Vaxx-heaven in 1823, Jenner was inundated with complaints about death and injury from the cowpus injection or ‘lymph’ node juice and intervention into a human shoulder. Jenner lamented the problems, but his professionalism was so crude and impoverished that he cared little about data which contradicted his milk-maid fantasy that cowpus or cowpox prevented smallpox. Jenner never did post stab analysis with control groups or over a longer period of time. The UK government was never interested in adding up the dead and injured post cowpox intervention.
Dead and injured unreported?
Jenner had no idea about immunology and could not fathom that injecting festering cow pus or lymph liquid from an infected cow might cause injury and harm in the recipient. There is no proof that either Jenner or his government enablers cared much about accurate and auditable record keeping. Any death or injury post-stabbination was ignored, a lie imitated by the Corona-jab cult. They were good at ‘cherry picking’ their cases, as the Corona Vaxx cult would imitate some 200 years later.
In 1818 Thomas Brown a Scottish doctor, a vaxx-religious and surgeon with 30 years of experience, described how no one in the medical profession “could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practice.” But after vaccinating 1,200 people and discovering that many still contracted and even died from smallpox, he wrote the following to a journal as a warning and mea-maxima-culpa.
Experience has also shewn [shown], that the natural smallpox have made their appearance, when the vaccine puncture had previously existed, surrounded with the areola of the most perfect appearance for more than two days, and not in the least modified, but in the highest degree confluent, and followed by death. Smallpox pustules, too, existed within the very areola of the vaccine puncture… The accounts from all quarters of the world, wherever vaccination has been introduced… the cases of failures are now increased to an alarming proportion; and from a fair and impartial examination appears, where the smallpox contagion has access to operate upon vaccinated cases of upwards of six years standing, and the contagion applied in a concentrated and lasting form, nearly the whole of such cases will yield to the influence of the smallpox contagion.
Thomas Brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, “On the Present State of Vaccination,” The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. 15, 1819, p67.
As with Corona, the dead and injured from smallpox injections were ignored by the establishment and those making money from the predation.
UK Government data, smallpox mortality goes up with the stabbing?
According to the UK Government figures in 1820, 85.000 children were ‘inoculated’ or stabbinated with Jenner’s cocktail of cowpus or lymph node-based injections. By 1821 the vaccination-cult was in full roar over its benefits – mostly because there was government income to be obtained, some £2 million p.a. in today’s money, rising to £10 million by the mid-1820s. An example of the propaganda is below.
Cambridge Chronicle 1821, citing the National Vaccine Establishment, admits to 792 dead from smallpox in 1820, down supposedly from over 2000 pre-1796.
The above government letter is curious. By 1820 the population of the UK was 14 million, with 7 million under 20. The at-risk demographic from smallpox is the very young, not yet exposed to it, and who do not have natural immunity. We can infer that maybe 100.000 new-borns and very young are at risk in 1820 (100.000 new-borns annually is a rough estimate). 792 died from smallpox or 0.8% of newly born in 1820. But this is not how the data is reported in textbooks or in the graph above (Our World in Data). The data is deaths/thousand population. In 1820 therefore we have 792 dead out of 14 million or a rounding error of 0.01%. This is not an epidemic and is far below the 1838 0.1% death rate. So where is the efficacy? The mortality rate goes up.
The same letter says that 84.000 were stabbed in the UK, in 1820 (below) – a record. And after 1825, with government investment and paid distribution, the jab-penetration rate takes off. In other words, the UK government is stabbing more people every year, but no noticeable decline in the very low death rate can be established over 20 years, in fact it appears to go up between 1820 and 1838.
The good doctors in the above epigram were no doubt amply remunerated for their jab-loyalty and enthusiastic stabbing of children. But that conflict of interest is of course, nowhere declared.
Claims don’t add up
The 1820 declaration above does not make sense and does nothing to support the stab-case. The total population of England in 1820 was 14.4 million, an increase of almost 2 million from 1811. The population had been exploding since 1750 for several reasons. About 50% of the population was under 20 years old. We can infer that by the mid-1820s, given the stab rates mentioned by government circulars, that the stabbination rate for smallpox must have been well over 50% nationally and in urban areas quite closer to 60-80% or higher given the easier means of reaching a condensed and slum dwelling populace.
Yet in the Bury Norwich Post of 1833 it is claimed by the government and the impressive sounding ‘Parliamentary Committee of the Vaccine Board’, that thanks to the stabs, smallpox mortality had declined by half since 1790 in London the site of the greatest poverty, filth, and slums. The population of London was 1.5 million in 1820, and probably close to 1.75 million in 1833. It had more than doubled from 1750. It was a younger population back then, with 50% of the population under 20 and that would be the at-risk population from the smallpox disease. The government figures below lead to some obvious problems.
According to this dispatch, by 1833, the vast majority of London new-borns are stabbed with the smallpox ‘vaccine’. In London it is claimed that some 35.000 were born in 1832 and only 26 died from smallpox, or 26/35.000 or .074%. If normalised for the entire population of London, it is much lower (as most stats are deaths/1000 population). Yet in the chart at the beginning of this post, derived from Edwardes 1902, for the year 1838, we are shown that the death rate was 1 per 1000 or 0.1%. According to the government’s own data in 5 years the number of dead from smallpox increased by 1.4 x or 140% or even more! How is that possible if it is safe and effective as the government propaganda claimed in 1833?
The Cambridge Chronicle dispatch also suffers from the same issue. No efficacy and reduced mortality is recorded over 18 years from 1820 until 1838 can be proven using the government’s own data. The government then falls back into what the Rona jab faithful intoned - ‘it would have been so much worse without the stabbinations’. No data supports that position. It seems quite evident that cycles of smallpox and other infectious diseases came and went in regular cycles, uninterrrupted by Jenner’s quack formulaes.
Death rates doubling means a decline?
Even worse for the vaxx-religious during the 1840s and 1850s the death from smallpox doubles again from 1839 as given by Edwardes (1902) in the image at the start of this post. Maybe the stabs killed and injured? Or were utterly useless? This is too much for the vaccine religion to contemplate. There is no possibility, even when looking at government data, that anyone can say that the stabbinations reduced mortality.
As with Corona, there is no source data which can be verified to support the British government’s claims which they issued in newspapers and journals. When smallpox mortality records are collated starting in 1838, it was well known by that time, that vaccinated children still died from smallpox, contracted other diseases or were seriously ill post stabbination. Yet none of these events would be recorded by the state.
“In the 1844 smallpox epidemic, about one-third of the vaccinated contracted a mild form of smallpox, but roughly 8 percent of those vaccinated still died, and nearly two-thirds had severe disease.”
George Greogory, MD, “Brief Notices of the Variolous Epidemic of 1844,” Royal Medical and Chirurgical Society, January 28, 1845, p. 163
Why was this doctor writing about a smallpox epidemic in 1844, if based on the Bury dispatches cited above, the vast majority of babies were stabbinated and why is this doctor plainly stating that the quacked are dying and nearly 66% are injured?
Force feed the Stabs
The UK government’s demands for compulsory vaccination take on a vicious and ominous tone in 1840. A law was passed that all new-borns were to be stabbed within 6 weeks. The dead and injured from smallpox injections were ascribed to charlatans and improper procedures and from illegal inoculations. As with the Corona stabs, the smallpox interventions were only safe and effective if delivered properly by paid agents of the state, namely doctors.
The Police issued a warning to get vaccinated in the Westmorland Gazette - Saturday 31 October 1840. Yet a few years later there was a widespread smallpox epidemic where the national death rate doubled. How is this possible if the stabs were safe and effective? Police coercion against the individual? Sound familiar? This regulation even admits to widespread death and injury including blindness in children after smallpox vaccinations, but blames improper and illegal interventions. Yet in spite of the carnage a parent is supposed to offer their children to the Moloch god of stabs.
Don’t debate, dehumanise
To counter these facts, and to silence the ‘anti-vaxxers’ who were organised and vociferous, the British government and medical ‘professionals’ who were making sizeable incomes from vaccination, took to the press and concocted campaigns of demonisation and ad-hominem attacks against any who opposed the quackery, calling their opponents unhealthy, stupid, ignorant, superstitious, uninformed, reckless, selfish and unclean. Sound familiar? Such attacks were repeated ad-nauseum during the Corona stab fascism and will be repeated again in the not-so-distant future. Nothing has changed in 200 years.
In place of facts and debate, de-humanise. $cientism has no connection with real science, real data, real facts, polite discourse, morality, humanity, a person’s right to choose, nor their right to protect their own bodies. It is a system of tyranny.