Scientism and Saint Jenner, the case against the Apostle of the Smallpox Stabbination. Part 2.
A Quack and his poison.
Part 1 which shows that there is no correlation between smallpox ‘vaccines’ and reduced mortality is here.
(St. James Gazette, June 2 1892, a reader calling into question ‘Jenner’s untrustworthy sham prophylactic’)
Saint Jenner and the Vaccine Religion
The religion of the Vaxx is largely based on the reduction of smallpox from epidemic scourge to an affliction less severe than chicken pox. The manufactured and marketed myth of an injection being ‘safe and effective’ against a virus, was formed during the early 19th century – an era famed for quacks, charlatans and frauds. One of its greatest quacks and snake-oil salesman, and the creator of injections against infectious disease, was the country doctor Sir Edward Jenner, the Holy Apostle of the Vaccination Church. Sir Edward has statues and honours aplenty testifying to his sainthood and the revelatory miracles of his magic cow-pus cocktail used against smallpox.
Online, in books, in ‘documentaries’ and in ‘medical’ journals, Saint Edward Jenner of Gloucestershire is always hailed as a ‘scientist’, an innovator and indeed, the saviour of tens of millions of lives. You cannot find anything negative about him online. Jenner is holier than Christ. Jenner’s ‘vaccination’ remedy in mythological and religious lore, saved everyone in the 19th century from the smallpox virus and certain death. In actual fact the death rate from smallpox in 1800, was 0.3% or the same as the modern flu.
The vaccine liturgy is so strong that in every state in the world, all babies and young children must be stabbinated with the smallpox-concoction which is part of a stable of between 20-70 stabbinations for the new-born and young. In many districts, children cannot attend school without the jab, and in some jurisdictions, the parents will be threatened by the police for child abuse and labelled ‘anti-vaxxers’. The reality is that health and sanitation improvements, begun in earnest in 1842 in England, and repeated worldwide, including water sanitation, city clean up, sewage removal, air quality improvement, hovel and ghetto reformation, along with improved diets, living standards, clothing and shelter, carried forward into the 20th century, ended smallpox and most contagious diseases.
There is plenty wrong with the Jenner myth and ‘accepted wisdom’. For starters he knew nothing about immunology or virology, objections made today by ‘the science’ against any who oppose stabbinations. It is ironic that such allegations directed at ‘anti-vaxxers’ questioning their qualifications are not levelled against Jenner.
Saint Jenner, the Stab Salesman
In 1796 Jenner injected his first victim a boy called James Phipps age 8. Jenner’s ‘science’ was extremely bizarre. Jenner took what he believed was cowpox from a milkmaid’s calloused cow-milking hand, and injected Phipps with the material. He then exposed the boy to smallpox. When Phipps did not contract the disease, he declared that cowpox vaccination was responsible. Based on this one sample, Jenner declaimed that one cowpox jab provided lifelong immunity against smallpox, later revised down to 3 years, and then 1 year. The entire episode is an experiment which defies common sense. Some problems:
· The injection of an innocent like Phipps was unethical, and there is no proof that Phipps or his parents give informed consent.
· A sample size of one is unscientific.
· Where is the control group and comparison?
· Length of time Phipps was observed is not related?
· Was the milkmaid’s callouses from cowpox or something else?
· Did Phipps have prior exposure to smallpox and thus immunity?
Phipps later died in 1853 age 65. It is unclear if Jenner stabbed all his son’s or just the eldest. Again, there is a paucity of professional recording keeping and experimental control by Jenner. Jenner never admitted to complications, issues or deaths from his experimental concoctions.
Phipps was Jenner’s only real experiment on cowpox and due to the anecdotal nature of his experiments, Jenner could arrive at whatever conclusion would suit his predetermined outcome. We would call this ‘Scientism’. As one critic noted:
The only real experiment in the paper on cowpox, as originally offered to the Royal Society, was the inoculation of James Phipps; the results of it, as we have seen, were recorded with a brevity which enabled Jenner to suppress the true and suggest the false. It is absurd to claim the dozen old cases of cowpoxed milkers, who were subsequently inoculated with smallpox, as experiments; there were many cowpoxed milkers… who submitted to inoculation along with others, whenever a general inoculation was afoot; and Jenner's cases were only a few, favourable to his contention… he himself stands for the man who “peremptorily decides on the truth or falsehood of a theory, on the supposed authority of a few solitary instances.”
Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, p. 59.
Far from the lonely, poor, hard-working ‘scientist’ trying to save humanity from the smallpox plague, Jenner comes across as devious, self-serving, arbitrary, unprofessional, and very short on details, replicable processes and experiments, and utterly uninterested in ethics, or the science of control groups, variable assessments and controls, and how the body actually functions against a disease.
Jenner’s ‘Method’
Jenner’s method was not novel. He purloined it from many others. He applied the cow pus directly into a person’s arm and then exposed them to smallpox from an infected human (the Phipps method). Or he rubbed pox pustular lymph from the pock of an ‘inoculated’ human (or one who was variolated which was a competing form of inoculation to Jenner’s), into a cut on the arm of the recipient. A third option was to place human pox scabs in a jar, fill it with water and shake it to form a pus which was then injected into the recipient’s arm. Injection success was usually measured by the reaction of the arm to the wounds. Often 4 injections were imposed on the recipient’s arm and the ‘scabbing’ or ‘good healing’ of the wounds indicated ‘success’. So much science.
However, just to confuse the sheeple, modern smallpox vaccines do not contain cowpox or smallpox virus but a human/animal hybrid agent that never existed in nature until the era of vaccination. Isn’t that comforting? In essence Jenner’s cow pus experimentation is null and void. His ingredients are no longer used and haven’t been tried for a long time. Why is that if he was so ‘successful’? Now modern smallpox stabs are based on material which has passed pox material back and forth between animals and humans. Some of the animals that have been used to passage today’s vaccine virus include rabbits, mice, goats, cows, horses, sheep, and humans. Where are the public studies on the efficacy of these materials, compared to control group assessments of the unstabbinated, over long periods of time? Nowhere to be found. So much science.
(see L. Qin, C. Upton, B. Hazes, and D. H. Evans, “Genomic Analysis of the Vaccinia Virus Strain Variants Found in Dryvax Vaccine,” Journal of Virology , vol. 85, no. 24, December 2011, pp.13049–13060)
Proof it works?
When Jenner published his paper in 1798 claiming lifelong immunity to smallpox and promoting his technique, many doctors who had seen smallpox follow cowpox challenged his doctrine at a meeting of the Medico-Convivial Society.
But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned it than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could have told him of hundreds of cases where smallpox had followed cow-pox…
Walter Hadwen, MD, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard’s Assembly Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
Replicated results were hard to find. A Dr. Drake in 1799 in Stroud, England, conducted an experiment using a vaccine obtained directly from Jenner. A control group of children were then subjected with a smallpox inoculation to see if the cowpox procedure had been effective. It wasn’t.
In three of them, a lad aged seventeen and two of the Colborne children (one four years, the other fifteen months), the cowpox vesicles came to early maturity and were scabbed under the usual time. The lad was inoculated with smallpox on the 20th December, being the eight day from his vaccination, and the two children on the 21st, being again the eight day. They all developed smallpox, both the local pustules and the general eruption with fever.
Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95–96.
Another doctor from Stroud a Dr. Hughes, verified and confirmed this experiment. Jenner was sent the results with a report but ignored it.
In London, Dr. Woodville, who ran the Smallpox Inoculation Hospital, started to use the cowpox inoculation. He performed arm-to-arm cowpox vaccination on hundreds of people. He acknowledged there were serious problems with this method.
…in several instances, the cowpox has proved a very severe disease. In three or four cases out of 500, the patient has been in considerable danger, and one child actually died.
Frederick F. Cartwright, Disease and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 130
Jenner was known to blame cowpox ‘variants’ on any failures experienced. This was repeated of course during the Corona scamdemic when the scariants made the last stab obsolete.
(Cheshire Daily Echo Feb 10 1903).
The antipathy to the quackcine was quite virulent and prodigious. Endless medical articles highlighted that being exposed to cowpox did not provide lifelong immunity to smallpox and was an unproven marketing assertion. In fact, many who were stabbed were either injured or died, far greater than the 1800 smallpox mortality rate of circa 0.4%. We saw the same fraud and murder with the Corona mRNA injections and the same disavowal by a wailing, totalitarian elite.
The Medical Observer for 1810 contains particulars of 535 cases of smallpox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, 150 cases of vaccine injuries, with the addresses of ten medical men, including two professors of anatomy, who had suffered in their own families from vaccination. An article in the 1817 London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review showed yet again that a great many people who had undergone vaccination were still suffering from smallpox.
“Vaccination by Act of Parliament,” Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
Deaths and injuries did not stop national governments mandating the smallpox vaccine as a law. Door to door visits and forced injections in cities was not that uncommon. As shown in the graphs in Part 1, the mortality rates did not diminish and in many cases increased after the national mandates went into enforcement.
Conclusion: Jenner was just another Quack
It is a truism and bromide to state that in the 18th and 19th centuries smallpox was a virulent disease – but in reality the death rate was about 0.4% or the same as the modern flu. The genesis of the smallpox infection was of course poverty, filth, squalor, unhygienic living, living in and around human and animal waste, with unsanitary living conditions. This was especially true after 1740 and the mechanisation, industrialisation of life, and the agglomeration of people into working class ghettoes where sanitation was unknown and major sanitation works did not occur until after 1850. Life was dirty, hard and diseased.
Jenner, living in the country, was less exposed to urban squalor and his well-off young family was at a far lower risk of catching smallpox. As a country doctor he was understandably worried about childhood infectious diseases. There is no reason not to assume his intentions at finding a cure for smallpox were genuine. But it is also very clear his lack of rigour, knowledge and professionalism, and his hurried unsupported, largely useless manufacture of what he called a ‘vaccine’, deserve no place in the annals of medical sainthood. Far from it. The data is clear that Jenner’s vials did nothing to stop smallpox and indeed contributed to an increase in smallpox mortality and injury.
As with the Corona mRNA, more died after the smallpox stabs than from the disease. This was well known in the 19th century. After the massive epidemic of 1871-72 and the utter failure of smallpox vaccination many in the public simply stopped taking the interventions protecting their children, and an entire city – Leicester – outlawed the smallpox jab until the 1930s and busied itself with hygiene and sanitation. Leicester saw a dramatic fall off in smallpox mortality from 1880 to 1930 due to its policy of cleanliness. The stabs were not deployed and played no role in the ending of smallpox in Leicester.
In short Jenner was mostly a 19th century quack, who bought his medical license and never performed a single, valid, control group experiment contrary to online propaganda. Rich businessmen invested in the ‘vaccine’ product and processes, and doctors were paid to inject. The government also invested some £10.000 in the scheme, much to Jenner’s benefit. This was an enormous sum in those days. But you won’t read or see any of this in the newspeak history and exclamations of amazement and wonder at the utility of such a great ‘discovery’.
We can also say that Jenner wasn’t the first or even the most innovative in the area of immunology. Many people were interested in stopping smallpox through a magic elixir. Variolation, inoculation and vaccination were all tried. The ease of manufacture and delivery of vaccination, the huge government investment, along with the business model of paying doctors and clinics to administer the injections was the decisive stroke in favour of vaccination. Money talks. The smallpox ‘vaccine’ is an early indication of $cientism, or the merger of supposed science with money, power and government regulation.
==
Also related to this is ‘Dissolving Illusions’ a must read book on the quackcines.