$cientism and demonising Plant Food. A critical look at cars, ‘emissions’ and real science around plant food.
There is no 'Climate Emergency' and no need to end hydrocarbon usage.
(There is not a shred of evidence that Co2 causes anything, or that modern temperatures or climate activities are abnormal, Buntgen et al 2011, 2017)
Moloch and Climate Fascism
The Climate-Cult is a $1.5 Trillion per annum market. As with drugs and pharmaceuticals, it is a growth industry and useful as a policy tool for the endless array of governments and their agencies, to emasculate populations, control them, and reduce their collective power. ‘Science’ and saving Gaia is used as the casus belli. Climate Change, Globaloney Boiling, Saving Gaia is a hoax, built around money, power and anti-humanism.
The splendiferous corruption and ignorance of the Climate Cult is on display on an almost weekly basis. Every week there is seemingly yet another billionaire-elitist-international confabulation on saving Gaia from human-emitted plant food. Pace the Corona Fascism, the latest Climate demand is to lock-down society. ‘The Science’ is fully onboard with the totalitarianism running rampant through a pathetic, demoralised, effeminate, irrational ‘West’ (called the ‘West’ since Christian Europe was the western rump of a once massive Christian civilisation, most of which was consumed by the Musulman Jihad). Anti-human determinism is the golden thread of this $cientism, which is a mortal threat to civilisation and human welfare. Humans are the virus and must be sacrificed on the pagan altars of $cientism. ‘Carbon Emissions’ must be ‘net zero’ cries the totalitarian, with no scientific evidence to support such an insane position. There is no ‘climate crisis’ or ‘warming’.
Ending Modernity
It is obvious that ending ‘emissions’ of plant food would simply end modern life. Locking down the planet which reduced ‘Co2’ emissions during the Corona fascism did nothing to stop the non-existent ‘Climate Change’. Here we are post the Corona fascism and the hue and cry from the same suspects is ‘Climate Crisis’. Locking down the globe and ending the use of clean hydro-carbon energy within a generation would assign the vast majority to impoverishment and quite likely mass starvation. That seems to be the entire premise in the Age of $cientism – or ‘Science’ used a pre-text by the elite to control, manipulate, enrich themselves and exterminate our species en-masse. The New World Order is simply a totalitarian dystopian-World Government and Climate-hysteria, and its attendant Fascism is a key component of the NOW.
(WEF Book, ‘The Great Reset’, this page summarise their entire philosophy)
Ideologies and Moloch
There are several channels to sacrifice humans to Moloch or Baal, being deployed by satanic cults in our not-so-modern-world and include:
1. De-hydro-carbonisation (the ending of clean burning hydrocarbons and industry)
2. Toxic injections for ‘Health’ and Scamdemics (mandatory stabbinations)
3. Toxins in food (MSG, Fructose, White Sugars, heavy metals)
4. Chemtrails and chemical sprays in the skies (heavy metals, aluminum, barium, blocking the Sun and reducing vitamin D)
5. Fluoride in the water (fluoride does not exist naturally, it is aluminium and fluorine)
6. Abortion and the slaughter of unborn babies (called ‘health care’)
7. HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program) is a US DoD initiative to weaponize climate and use it as a weapon of mass destruction
All of the above are about debasing and annihilating the essentials of life; our babies, our food, our energy, our bodies, the air, and our natural weather systems. All of these initiatives reference ‘science’ in their models, but no actual science supports any of it (you don’t need HAARP to ‘understand’ and ‘control’ the atmosphere, you don’t need fluoride which destroys your bones etc). $cientism is a better description, or the nexus of power, government, corporations, and profits, mixed in with materialist-anti humanist ideology.
(Roy Spencer, University of Alabama, based on Satellite records)
4 parts per million
Plant food is 0.04% gas by weight, 95% emitted by Gaia, it does not control climate any more than the carbon, nitrogen or water cycles control climate. Plant food falls out of climate and Co2 is at very low levels when compared to past epochs, including the Roman and early Medieval periods. Plant food is necessary for life and is a part of photosynthesis producing oxygen. Plant food is not a toxin. There is no correlation between plant food emissions and weather – none. Plant food is not Satan.
As for ‘climate’ from 1945-1975 the fearmongering, based on plant food ‘emissions’, focused on the coming Ice age. 50 years later, this is inverted to declaim against ‘boiling’. All from the same trace chemical. We know that the data ‘proving’ the non-existing ‘warming’ is ‘cooked’ and ‘fraudulent’. As with $cientism at large, we need to follow the money to find the ‘science’. The ‘solutions’ to the non-existing problem always ends up being a very lucrative and profitable market for governments and their corporate-billionaire allies and associated firms and organisations, not to mention universities, research institutions and academics.
Co2 in the atmosphere
More than 1 Trillion metric tonnes of Co2 exists in the atmosphere, with 95% or more from Gaia and natural processes (a tonne is 1000 Kg, a ‘ton’ is 907 kg). In fact, it is fair to say we don’t know the actual concentration level of Co2 in the atmosphere, in-toto, given that measuring chemical elements in the atmosphere is very much modelling and guess work. We also know that the statistical modelling of human emitted Co2 is largely guess work. Global data coverage for emissions does not exist and different ‘methodologies’ all laced with endless assumptions and riddled with gaps are used. When the ‘science’ says that humans emit 50 billion tonnes p.a. of Co2, take it with a pinch of salt assuming an exaggeration of 50% or more.
Similar to the fraudulent climate models and their hysterical anti-science forecasts and temperature claims, the models estimating how much Co2 is actually in our atmosphere and emitted by human output can be torn to bits. You won’t find much analysis of these online. The $cientism of Climate present their data with absolute certainty and confidence.
Emissions and models
According to $cientism, humans in total, emit some 50 billion tonnes of Co2 a year. This includes all energy, industry, and vehicles worldwide. This figure is almost entirely model based and a conjecture. These models and calculations are not scientific nor accurate. The total is quite likely a lot lower. But does it matter?
Of course not. These emission totals are irrelevant. In past eras Co2 was both much higher and much lower, with Ice Ages, floods and very hot temperatures existing, uncorrelated with plant food. Co2 does not control anything and falls out of natural processes. Trees and flora ‘store’ and use plant food in photo synthesis. The ‘carbon capture’ of forests and flora is poorly understood and the models vastly underestimate the natural recycling of Co2. . At least half of yearly Co2 emissions are recycled. You won’t see this in the ‘models’.
The models do not account for volcanic eruptions. A single volcanic expulsion can generate some 300 million tonnes or more of Co2 or 6% the yearly human output. There are roughly 70 volcanic eruptions every single year, with the potential Co2 emissions of 21 billion tonnes, or almost half of human output. Should ‘the science’ plug and cap volcanoes next and prevent said eruptions? Surely this must be a pressing issue to reduce Co2 and save Gaia.
The fake Co2 calculations used by the fake news, fake science, and ‘carbon trading’ outfits who enrich the billionaire class, are largely premised on the fraudulent and politically motivated and controlled IPCC (Inter-Governmental Panel Group on Climate Change). People may remember the Climate-Gates (plural) and the fabrication of the entire thesis of warming by a handful of corrupt bureaucrats in the US and UK. The IPCC is not a scientific group, it is an activist group. Their emissions calculations are entirely model based and as any of us who work in IT know, models and data can be manipulated to give any answer you want. With most models in the real world, much of the source data is either corrupted, bad, or can be interpreted in many different ways.
Your car
The average automobile ejects nitrogen and sulfuric particulate, and very little Co2. Based on very dodgy models and measurements, your petrol car may emit 100 g of Co2 per kilometre. Over the average life of a car (say 75.000 km in total), some 7.5 million grams, or 16,500 pounds of Co2 might be released, based on models and assumptions that can be ripped to shreds. The $cientism of Gaia claims this is a terrifying amount. Is it?
As with the Big Bang fraud, once you dig into the underlying maths, science and arcana, you discover that they don’t really know what they are talking about. We do know however based on their own data, that yearly vehicle emissions worldwide are a rounding error and would account for no more than 8 billion tonnes of Co2 per annum, or <1.0% of the total Co2 in the atmosphere. You are going to lose the use of your diesel engine for a rounding error impact. As with the Corona fascism and other cults of ‘the science’, rounding errors always loom massive in their propaganda and models.
What does your car emit?
In reality petrol and diesel-engine motor vehicles emit principally carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and particulate matter (PM10). The only impact might be on air quality. Air quality in every major city has gotten much better since the 1970s and there has been a 98% reduction in particulate emissions in the past 50 years. Co2 is a mole fraction of the emissions, but within the cult’s ‘models’ the entire emission is counted as a ‘greenhouse gas’, this artificially inflates their numbers of course but it is what one would expect when dealing with $cientism. There is a lot of money in the market to end cars, or build EV vehicles, or provide the technology to monitor and ‘reduce’ emissions.
Your diesel car must die
The UK government and most ‘advanced’ states are advocating that 80% of cars sold by 2030 or 2035 must be ‘electric’. EV batteries are not Gaia-friendly, are toxic and end up leeching into the eco-system from mass-disposal sites some 6-10 years after they are bought, given their short shelf life. There is not enough copper, lithium, cobalt or nickel in the world to sustain modern fleets of vehicles. Slave labour is used to mine the rare minerals and enormous pits are dug into Gaia’s tender skin to allow child slaves to procure the material. The inhumanity and eco-destruction are left unaddressed by the Green Fascists.
EV batteries do not cut ‘emissions’, in fact they probably increase Co2 emissions (manufacturing, charging). The power distribution and charging systems do not exist to support a mass conversion of vehicles to EV usage. Few can afford an EV car or truck and the batteries need replacing every 6-8 years resulting in at least a $10.000 cost. The total cost of ownership will be astronomical, as electricity grids are rationed to provide energy supply and taxes are heaped onto consumers to pay for the infrastructure builds. Few of us will be able to afford any of this.
It is also ridiculous to expect massive fleets of transports, large trucks or construction and heavy industry vehicles to run on the limited life of EVs. Costs for all products in any supply chain will explode. It is clear that the objective is to end car usage for the masses and disrupt long distance trade and travel.
Co2 and Basic Science
You won’t find much real science on-line. Any searches on Co2 brings you to the narrative of $cientism and the doom from the non-toxin called plant food and the ‘runaway greenhouse effect’ with the inconvenient and never-mentioned truth that water vapour is 70% of these supposed heat absorbing and radiating gases. Co2 has little to do with heat accumulation and energy radiation if we look at the real science of spectral bands, Planck’s law and absorption.
1) Molecules in the atmosphere absorb light waves over what are called spectral bands. Spectral band absorption in the atmosphere can be quantified based on measurements over a certain distance through the atmosphere (eg 300 m above sea level).
2) The Earth emits a spectrum, or wavelength continuum, of radiation that is completely described by Planck’s Law, which has been validated by experimental data for over a hundred years.
3) There are two spectral bands in which the CO2 molecule absorbs infrared radiation. The first band is in what is called the Medium Wave InfraRed (MWIR) spectrum, and the second spectral band is in the Light Wave or LWIR spectrum. The LWIR band is the most important in the absorption of infrared radiation (see the IR Handbook).
4) In the LWIR absorption band of CO2 (center wavelength of 15 microns) the transmission measured is 0.0 due to CO2 absorption. This means a total of 100% absorption over 300 meters at sea level, within the spectral absorption band of CO2, that would capture the most energy, or “heat”, being radiated by the earth’s surface.
So, what does the above mean?
Co2 absorption of 'heat' is both a myth and unimportant in climatic variation. You cannot go beyond 100% heat absorption, yet that is what the Climate Cult is trying to sell with its inflated absorption rates. Within LWIR there is a ‘limit’ on Co2 heat absorption, claiming otherwise is anti-science.
Co2 is also exothermic, meaning it has both ‘warming’ (endothermic) and ‘cooling’ (heat reduction) properties. Co2 is not a uni-directional ‘heat trapper’. It does not create a warm blanket. It can absorb energy up to 100% of its mole fraction weight, but it also demonstrates cooling attributes.
At higher altitudes NASA has publicly stated that C02 is a ‘cooling agent’. Given that ‘Not A Space Agency’ (for the moon fraud see here), is also a prime beneficiary and promoter of Climate nonsense, the fact that Co2 has cooling properties within the LWIR and at higher altitudes is a rather large inconvenient truth. According to ‘the science’ there is a greenhouse effect from Co2 in the lower atmosphere, but a cooling effect in the upper atmosphere. Marvellous stuff. Like the Corona ‘virus’, the Co2 is a chameleon and jack of all trades. In any event the greenhouse myth is a fraud, given that the Earth is an open system and Co2 plays a minor role in heat transfer.
Co2 helps Gaia
More plant food means healthier flora and improved growth and farming productivity. Garbage climate-models have failed to take into account the obvious fact that when carbon dioxide builds up in the atmosphere, plants actually thrive, become larger, and are able to soak up more Co2. The natural recycling of carbon and Co2 accelerates. As part of photosynthesis – a natural cycle that helps plants convert sunlight into energy – plants capture Co2 to help them grow and then release oxygen as a waste product. No models accurately take this into account.
Bottom line
With ‘$cientism’ and its various religious cults, follow the money. Climate change is a massive industry for huge corporations, universities, research groups and the billionaire class. This massive industry is pregnant with opportunities for the UN, the WEF, and the endless strata of governments worldwide to tax, sur-tax and through various policies around de-hydro carbonisation, completely control society. For the more psychopathic, it is a casus belli to murder billions of people.
In terms of real science, we don’t know the actual tonnage of Co2 which is emitted into the atmosphere, nor any of its effects. We do know that Co2 is beneficial and has both warming and cooling properties. We do know that the human emission of this beneficial gas is negligible compared to the 1 Trillion tonnes which exists in the atmosphere. We do know that weather is not climate and there is no proof that weather events are changing appreciably when the longue durée of history is viewed. We do know and can deduce using reason and logic, that Climate Change is junk science and turtles all the way down.
===Related Articles====
Climate Change as a Religious Cult
The Church of Climate and the Vatican
=======================
Excellent series of articles. I also have written a series of articles on Scientism from a Christian perspective showing it’s occult origins from the Kabbalah. I will thoroughly read your works and recommend you on my page!
God bless you and your efforts!