"I don’t think we have much of a clue about disease, its true creation, its transmission if any, or how microzymas or microorganisms operate. But such humility is never found within the Churches of ‘The Science’."
I agree. Perhaps the least risky policy is protecting natural good health with clean water, fresh food, good housing and the like, avoiding drugs, and other poisons, as far as possible. Maybe most of what we think of as illness is the reaction of our body to some poison, either because we ate it or breathed it or had it injected into our blood or it was already in us but multiplied there due to some weakness of our natural good health to subdue it (perhaps made worse by poor nutrition or stress etc). Since we have no idea what life is or how the things our bodies are made of express life or even what those things are that we are made of or how they interact with each other, how on earth can we possibly accept some simplistic mechanistic analogy that one thing - a germ - causes another - sickness - and that this can be combated with a drug. Ironically it is this very impossibility that lets the vaccine pushers off the hook. I suspect making an offering to a God might have more chance of success in a case of illness - at least we would not risk poisoning ourselves.
Thanks David, totally agree. Koch's own postulates applied to his own work on germs or those of Pasteur invalidate their theories. And it is just a theory. However the theory is now a scientific fact and the establishment labels people 'germ denialists' if they question the religious orthodoxy. Billions spent on cancer 'research' (or salaries, travel, nice offices etc), and the 'experts' have no idea what causes cancer. Cells are destroyed as you said via toxins, ingested in food, water, alcohol, drugs, and quackcines etc. It seems clear that external agents can destroy your cells, but there is no proof that a rambling monomorphic 'germ' whatever that is, or a water borne flying virus exist or have anything to do with being ill. SARS II was never isolated and no one can show the 'virus'. Other viruses - smallpox, rabies, etc simply don't exist. We can't even describe why we get colds and sometimes, but not always, transfer them to others. We have all been around sneezing, coughing, spitting sick people and yet nothing happens to us. Why? Virology is akin to geology - a lot of guesswork which they clothe in 'science'.
Béchamp theory is very similar to the one told in Tibetan medicine. There are billions of "small animals" living in our body, when our humors go out of balance, it disturbes them and this makes us sick.
Interesting information thanks Niki. The Greeks discussed the 4 humours though the modern mind usually confuses what they mean (water, fire, earth, air - they refer to balances of forces, chemicals not just the objects or subjects named). No doubt we ingest poisons - chemicals, drugs, rotted food etc and that upsets the balance. As mom said, 'you are what you eat'....(and drink).
Anther informative post. Thanks
"I don’t think we have much of a clue about disease, its true creation, its transmission if any, or how microzymas or microorganisms operate. But such humility is never found within the Churches of ‘The Science’."
I agree. Perhaps the least risky policy is protecting natural good health with clean water, fresh food, good housing and the like, avoiding drugs, and other poisons, as far as possible. Maybe most of what we think of as illness is the reaction of our body to some poison, either because we ate it or breathed it or had it injected into our blood or it was already in us but multiplied there due to some weakness of our natural good health to subdue it (perhaps made worse by poor nutrition or stress etc). Since we have no idea what life is or how the things our bodies are made of express life or even what those things are that we are made of or how they interact with each other, how on earth can we possibly accept some simplistic mechanistic analogy that one thing - a germ - causes another - sickness - and that this can be combated with a drug. Ironically it is this very impossibility that lets the vaccine pushers off the hook. I suspect making an offering to a God might have more chance of success in a case of illness - at least we would not risk poisoning ourselves.
Thanks David, totally agree. Koch's own postulates applied to his own work on germs or those of Pasteur invalidate their theories. And it is just a theory. However the theory is now a scientific fact and the establishment labels people 'germ denialists' if they question the religious orthodoxy. Billions spent on cancer 'research' (or salaries, travel, nice offices etc), and the 'experts' have no idea what causes cancer. Cells are destroyed as you said via toxins, ingested in food, water, alcohol, drugs, and quackcines etc. It seems clear that external agents can destroy your cells, but there is no proof that a rambling monomorphic 'germ' whatever that is, or a water borne flying virus exist or have anything to do with being ill. SARS II was never isolated and no one can show the 'virus'. Other viruses - smallpox, rabies, etc simply don't exist. We can't even describe why we get colds and sometimes, but not always, transfer them to others. We have all been around sneezing, coughing, spitting sick people and yet nothing happens to us. Why? Virology is akin to geology - a lot of guesswork which they clothe in 'science'.
Béchamp theory is very similar to the one told in Tibetan medicine. There are billions of "small animals" living in our body, when our humors go out of balance, it disturbes them and this makes us sick.
Interesting information thanks Niki. The Greeks discussed the 4 humours though the modern mind usually confuses what they mean (water, fire, earth, air - they refer to balances of forces, chemicals not just the objects or subjects named). No doubt we ingest poisons - chemicals, drugs, rotted food etc and that upsets the balance. As mom said, 'you are what you eat'....(and drink).