$cientism: Germ and Virus theory nonsense. Béchamp’s experiments which disprove ‘germ and virus theory’.

The colossal failure of modern health and medicine and the creation of the criminal Pharma industry - all based on a myth.

Précis

It is obvious to anyone who has a functioning cortex, that the Corona plandemic used the mythical scariants of ‘viruses’ as the casus belli for what is rightly termed a poisonous and often lethal injection marketed as health care, designed to accrue profits and power.  As the founder of Merck said, create the disease, sell the cure.  Since the days of the quack and fraud Jenner, ‘germs’ and ‘viruses’ have invaded the imaginations of the ‘science’ and its ‘experts’ and our daily lexicon, much to the detriment of health and freedom.  As Antoine Béchamp noted in his book ‘Les Microzymas’ p. 819 (1878), on the incoherence of ‘germ’ theory:

‘In all the experiments of recent years, it has been the microzyma proper to an animal and not a germ of the air that has been found to be the seat of the virulence.  No one has even been able to produce with germs obtained from the atmosphere any of the so-called parasitic diseases.  Whenever, by inoculation, a typical known malady has been reproduced, it has been necessary to go and take the supposed parasite from a sick animal; thus to inoculate tuberculosis, the tubercle has to be taken from the subject affected.’

No germ or virus carrying disease or infection has ever been isolated in the atmosphere or even in a human cell.  Germ theory wrongly conflates external ‘germs’ with internal bacteria and microzymas which do produce disease as explained below.  The implications of this fraud and incoherence is staggering.

The Human cell and disease

Bacteria exist in their billions inside each human body.  What Béchamp discovered was that these ‘microbes’ or microzymas as he named them, can develop into bacteria and are not only vital to clean out the human body and cell detritus, but they can change shape, form and function if the ‘terrain’ or environment of the body is assaulted with poisons and becomes toxic.  This completely upends Pasteurian myth and our entire modern medical and healthy systems. 

Inside each human cell, there is a nucleus which contains DNA genetic material (deoxyribonucleic acid).  The nucleus has a membrane which is similar to the cell membrane.  There is also a pathway to the nucleus of each human cell called the endoplasmic reticulum.  This has ribosome's connected to it which also contain genetic material called RNA (ribonucleic acid), or the ‘logic’ that transcribes the ‘plans’ from DNA to produce functionality.  This endoplasmic reticulum is also made of cellular membrane material.  Each human cell is therefore a very complicated ecosystem with ‘organelles’ floating in a watery mixture called a cytoplasm which also harbours RNA.  

In a case of toxaemia poisoning, a cell, containing the complexity mentioned above, will burst, providing an abundance of cellular membrane material containing the sticky proteins of DNA and RNA which are now floating in the fluid between the other living cells.  This is called the interstitial fluid.  ‘Germs’ are simply bacteria which normally do waste management but have now changed their shape and function to feed on the cellular destruction, spreading the toxicity and detritus.  As with any living organism these pleomorphic (many forms) bacterium emit waste, fluids and if the cell is damaged and toxic, poisons.  In simple terms this process is what causes an illness.

The important point is that if the host’s toxicity is pervasive, the bacterial effluence and invasion can damage cells.  This is not from an external barbarian-germ or virus invasion, but due entirely to the detritus and cellular debris now building up and furthering the toxicity of the host. 

Immunology

Immunity is a defence system the body uses to eliminate toxic matter that has built up over a period of time.  The immune system is wonderfully complex and starts when the ‘front lines’ of the body’s defence have not been able to eliminate toxic matter effectively, and the toxicity has breached the circulatory system and organs.  Our immune systems will then issue white blood cells which are designed to remove dead organic matter, or garbage, from the body. 

Within the immune system antibodies are also produced.  These are specially synthesized body proteins which aid the white blood cells when toxicity reaches more extreme levels and when the body is trying to eject a surfeit of poison.  For the record injecting antibodies in the form of jabs and stabs is not only useless but dangerous, given that the immune system will not recognise the foreign antibodies as anything other than a foreign toxic agent and the compound proteins they contain cannot be broken down and will directly damage organs and tissues. 

‘Germ theory’ identified centuries before Pasteur

F. Harrison, a Professor of Bacteriology at McGill University, wrote a book, ‘Historical Review of Microbiology, published in Microbiology’, in which he says: “Geronimo Fracastorio (an Italian poet and physician, 1483 – 1553) of Verona, published a work (De Contagionibus et Contagiosis Morbis, et eorum Curatione) in Venice in 1546 which contained the first statement of the true nature of contagion, infection, or disease organisms, and of the modes of transmission of infectious disease.”  This predates Pasteur by 300 years.

Fracastorio divided diseases into different groups, one of which infected the host by either immediate contact, through intermediate agents, or at a distance through the air.  Organisms which cause disease were in his view, composed of viscous or glutinous matter. These particles, too small to be seen, were also capable of reproduction in appropriate media, and became pathogenic through the action of animal heat.  These concepts anticipate Pasteur’s ideas.  Fracastorio did not possess a microscope and could not know that these substances might be individual living organisms.

According to Harrison the first compound microscope was made in 1590 in Holland, but it was not until about 1683 that anything was built of sufficient power to show up bacteria.  Harrison relates: “In the year 1683, Antonius van Leenwenhoek, a Dutch naturalist and a maker of lenses, communicated to the English Royal Society the results of observations which he had made with a simple microscope of his own construction, magnifying from 100 to 150 times. He found in water, saliva, dental tartar, etc., entities he named animalcula.” 

Animalcula are microscopic animals.  Based on these observations M. A. Von Plenciz, a Viennese physician, in 1762 published a germ theory of infectious diseases.  Plenciz maintained that there was a special organism by which each infectious disease was produced, and that micro-organisms were “capable of reproduction outside of the body, and that they might be conveyed from place to place by the air.”  Here is Pasteur’s theory in pithy summary 100 years in advance of his ‘discovery’.

Béchamp’s experiments

Historically therefore the idea of entities called ‘germs’ perhaps causing disease predates Louis Pasteur by several centuries.  By 1878, after some 20 years of research, Pasteur was however credited with ‘proving’ the full tenets of the germ theory, solidifying the theory with 'laws’, supported by the very flexible ‘postulates’ developed by Koch, which are used this very day in the determination of ‘germ-borne’ disease.  Yet ignored by Pasteur and his rich and powerful associates, and most of ‘the science’, Béchamp had long before 1878 disproven the idea of external microbes invading a body and corrupting it with infection and disease. 

In a number of experiments starting in 1856 and lasting almost 30 years, Béchamp proved that virulent bacteria are generated within the body and do not and cannot migrate to another host.  In 1856 Béchamp showed that moulds transformed cane sugar into glucose, in the same manner as does the inverting ferment secreted by beer yeast.  The development of these moulds was abetted by certain salts, impeded by others, but without these moulds, or bacteria cultures, there was no transformation.  Under Béchamp’s microscope, the moulds were seen to be formed by a collection of molecular granulations which he named ‘microzymas’ (Greek for small ferment).  He also found them in geological calcareous strata.  

Béchamp established that these microzymas were living beings, individualised, and capable of inverting sugar and in some cases causing the sugar to ferment.  He mused that they could be of great age and last long ages (the ones he found in calcite or chalk).  Importantly he also repeatedly proved that these organelles under certain conditions would morph into bacteria and that they were pleo-or polymorphic, changing into shape and function based on the environment and conditions.

During innumerable laboratory experiments, assisted now by a Professor Estor, Béchamp found microzymas everywhere, in all organic matter, in both healthy and diseased tissues.  He also found them curiously associated with various kinds of bacteria.  After painstaking study and analysis, Béchamp decided that the microzymas rather than the cell, were the elementary units of life, and were in fact the builders of cell tissues.  This is a contentious and often ignored conclusion. (see R. Leverson, “Louis Pasteur, Plagiarist, Imposter”).  

Béchamp also concluded that bacteria are an outgrowth, or an instantiation of microzymas that occur when a quantity of diseased tissue is broken up into its elements.  He wrote that all living organisms are composed of these minute living entities, and their presence is necessary for cell life to grow and for cells to be repaired.  Bacteria, as Béchamp and Estor proved, can develop from microzyma by passing through certain intermediate stages, which they described, and which have been regarded by other researchers as different species, yet they are the same bacteria with pleomorphism, or more than 1 shape.  Pleomorphism in bacteria has long been proven and this is what Pasteur and others would call a ‘germ’, namely pleomorphic microzymas engaged in the ingestion of broken cell membranes and DNA.

The dead cat bounce

Béchamp knew that when someone referenced ‘germs’ in the air they could only mean released microzymas or bacteria, which have been set free when their former habitat was broken up.  To test these theories in 1868, Béchamp and Estor buried the body of a kitten in a pure carbonate of lime, specially prepared and creosoted to exclude any airborne or outside germs.  They placed it in a glass jar and covered the open top with several sheets of paper, placed to allow a renewal of the air without allowing dust or organisms to enter.  This was left on a shelf in Béchamp’s laboratory until the end of 1874.  When opened, it was found that the kitten’s body had been entirely consumed except for some small fragments of bone and dry matter.  There was no smell, and the carbonate of lime was not discoloured.  Under the microscope, microzymas were not seen in the upper part of the carbonate of lime, but ‘swarmed by thousands’ in the part that had been below the kitten’s body. 

Béchamp surmised that there might have been airborne germs in the kitten’s fur, lungs or intestines, so he repeated this experiment, using the whole carcass of a kitten in one case, the liver only in another, and the heart, lungs and kidneys in a third test. These viscera were set into carbolic acid the moment they had been detached from the slaughtered animal.  This experiment began in June 1875 and continued to August 1882, over seven years.  It completely satisfied Béchamp that microzymas were the living remains of plant and animal life and that they were the primary anatomical elements of all living beings.  He proved that on the death of an organ its cells disappear, but the microzymas remain, imperishable. 

Given the exclusion of airborne contamination, these two experiments proved that internal bacteria can and do develop from microzymas and are in fact a scavenging form of the microzymas or saprophyte (more below), developed when death, decay, or disease cause an extraordinary amount of cell life either to need repair or be broken up.  Béchamp wrote in 1869:

“In typhoid fever, gangrene and anthrax, the existence has been found of bacteria in the tissues and blood, and one was very much disposed to take them for granted as cases of ordinary parasitism. It is evident, after what we have said, that instead of maintaining that the affection has had as its origin and cause the introduction into the organism of foreign germs with their consequent action, one should affirm that one only has to deal with an alteration of the function of microzymas, an alteration indicated by the change that has taken place in their form.”

Disease is endogenously manufactured, not exogenously created.

What Béchamp had uncovered was that microzymas can develop into saprophytes, a type of bacteria which are produced primarily for breaking down matter into its' constituent elements.  This is precisely what happens when you get sick.  The saprophytes are not attacking you the host.  They are attempting to bring the toxified terrain to better health by removing the diseased, toxic cellular material from the your tissues.  This means that the ill-defined ‘germs’, which are just internal microzymas, cannot cause the disease.  Toxicity produces illness.   

Experiments confirmed

The Béchamp experiments were reproduced many times by many scientists through the early 1900's.  Upon the advancement of laboratory technology, isolated tissues were used instead of entire organs suspended in aseptic fluid.  The same results were produced time and time again.  In general, the experiments proved that on the outside of a tissue that had been in contact with the aseptic material, there were obviously no microbes.  There were microbes, as expected, within the internal cells that did not contact the fluid.  

In the 1920s a rather brilliant American scientist Raymond Riffe postulated that much was missing when he looked at cellular materials under the common compound microscope.  He theorized that a lack of ultraviolet light hid microscopic life since the glass of a common microscope does not allow UV radiation to enter the field of view.  Riffe proceeded to build a series of advanced microscopes, using quartz and not glass that remain second to none.  The quartz lens allowed the full range of UV light to come into the scope's field of view.  He then began to see worlds of microscopic detail.  Riffe also came up with a system of magnification that rivalled early electron microscopes of our day; about 150,000 X magnification.  

Riffe viewed all kinds of tissues with his new scopes, both alive and dead, and found Béchamp’s microzyma everywhere.  He found smaller and smaller units of microzyma in all tissues.  Like Béchamp, Riffe discovered that these small units of life spontaneously developed into varying forms of larger micro-organisms, solely dependent on the type of tissue in which they existed (healthy or toxic).  He also found an intimate connection between cellular toxicity and cancer which he tried to remedy through electro-magnetic radiation.  This insight is ignored today.  In today’s parlance these would be named ‘viruses’ or ‘cancerous cells’, but they are not – they are bacteria and destroyed cellular tissue, created by toxicity.  For the record, there is no single definition of a ‘virus’, it can mean anything to anyone. 

The Journal for the Franklin Institute in Pennsylvania described Riffe's work in 1944, in an article titled ‘The New Microscopes’.  The review states, ‘Riffe showed that by altering the environment and food supply, friendly germs such as colon bacillus can be converted into pathogenic germs, such as typhoid, and that this process is reversible. Experiments in the Riffe lab established that the virus of cancer, like viruses from other diseases, can easily be changed from one form to another by means of altering the media upon which they feed.... with the first change of the media, the cancer virus becomes enlarged (looking very much like E. coli )….’

Riffe’s work is completely forgotten and rubbished.  His conclusions are the exact opposite to today’s ‘science’ which bombards the body with radiation and ‘chemo-therapy’ itself based on mustard gas from World War I.

Riffe's work approached microzymas from one angle, proving Béchamp correct.  Before Riffe, a Dr. Roseneau at the Mayo Biological Laboratory in 1910, used the opposite method and proved that bacteria demonstrate pleomorphism when you change their environment.  Roseneau took a myriad of disease microzymas (or ‘germs’) and placed them in the same media.  He found that over time they all transformed into the same micro-organism, again confirming pleomorphism.  

Immunity and pleomorphism

Béchamp and dozens of scientists have proven that bacteria are not a fixed species.  A cocci can become a bacilli, a spirili, and vice versa.  Streptococci and pneumococci interchange.  All bacteria either acquire or lose virulence depending upon their environment.  Bacteria change to moulds and vice versa in response to adequate environmental stimuli.  Furthermore, they can resolve into their smallest form, a sub-microscopic granule [or Béchamp’s microzyma].  The bacterial ‘toxins’ which were once thought to be entirely free of particles, are not homogeneous solutions at all, but actually contain the tiny granular stages of bacteria which broke down to form them. 

In fact, microzyma are so pleomorphic that Béchamp witnessed them change into virtually every viral, bacterial and fungal microbial shape known to science, simply by shifting the environment in which they existed.  All of this means that Pasteur’s ‘monomorphic’ theory, in which ‘one germ’ causes ‘one disease’ is junk science.

The Bottom line

Béchamp’s theory of how diseases are generated appears the most likely, common sensical and experimentally proven.  Not a single experiment can isolate a germ or virus in the air that is virulent or carrying a disease.  Ask someone for proof of this when they intone ‘germ theory’. The entire premise of modern health and medicine is thus a chimera and a fraud as are ‘viral’ pandemics and epidemics. 

If we manage our diets in a healthy manner; if we maintain our fluid balance properly to persistently cleanse our circulatory system and lymphatic system; if we strive to keep our circulatory and lymphatic systems alkaline; if we exercise, take vitamins and explore nature; if we eat and drink properly and construct a healthy varied diet; if we eschew alcohol, sugars and drugs including quackcines; if we act productively and responsibly; if we manage our stress, if we love and forgive; if we are active in life and the community; if we believe in something more than ourselves; if we develop our immaterial reality; then microzyma will have no need to change into a pathogen or infective microbe as classified by modern medicine.  

People certainly don’t need the anti-health diktats of face-diapers which do nothing but force ingestion of bacteria and Co2, nor Pharma-drugs and injections with their heavy metals, ‘protein spikes’, mRNA, simian tissue, murdered baby tissue, or chemical poisons to ‘fight off’ the non-existent exogenous ‘germ’.  Disease arrives from endogenous pleomorphic microzymas and bacteria which are ingesting and cleaning up broken cells, shattered by toxicity.  There is no perambulating, flying, virulently malevolent ‘germ or virus’.  It is a myth and Pasteur’s theory is a fraud designed for profit and power, not health.  The terrain is king.

We can close with Hippocrates, the weathered old Greek of medicinal lore from the 5^th century B.C.:

"Diseases of any kind are crises of purification, of toxic elimination. Symptoms are the natural defences of the body. We call them diseases, but in fact they are the cure of diseases." 

Hippocrates was right.  Not much has changed in 2400 years except that we have forgotten real science, real observational evidence.  Drugs are now health.  Poisons are now vitamins. Your slavery is freedom.

Previous article on this topic