(Just a cockup, a fake news headline from 1989 - Governments must yield national sovereignty to international governance)
Introduction
Climate Scientism and the cult of Climate-geddon fail basic science.
This post follows on from the previous deposition on the Federated New World Order and relates to many posts on the Climate totalitarianism enveloping society (links at the end of the post). Totalitarian Fascism was defined and refined in the previous post and is a framework of reference for global governance models premised on ‘Health’, ‘Climate’ and energy control. Because ‘Climate’ is marketed as global (it isn’t) and supposedly occurs with velocity and malice, a global governance model as recommended by the UN, WEF and others is the only ‘scientific’ solution to resolve this non-existent ‘crisis’. All of this is based on junk science of course.
Transnational Climate Scientism is a core foundation of the New World Order. It runs in partnership with the Health-Medical Nazism we experienced during the Corona plandemic. Climate and ‘Health’ will be linked of course, through an outbreak of ‘disease X’ caused by anthropomorphic activity which has deranged Gaia, giving her no choice but to ‘fight back’ with a zoonotic scariant virus. To ‘survive’ we will be told that global governance or a Federated structure of global power is necessary. (It should be noted that many of the modern ‘plagues’ we are supposed to cower in terror from, were assembled and manufactured by US biolabs including Ebola, HIV, Dengue, Marburg, Sars II to name a few)
State capture
What we want to do here is list some reasons why the Scientism of Climate is a deranged, neo-Malthusian, anti-human, anti-science, cult. Scientism is largely the union of State and corporate actors merging interests for profit and complete control over society, or parts of it. We see this with the complete capture of State agencies, academic and research institutions, and most media platforms across the world, by the ‘Climate’ narrative and its money, including the endless issuance of false and fake studies linking human created ‘Climate change’ with every possible weather event or every possible issue, real or imagined. The propaganda from the Climate cult is relentless derived from endless billions of available spend.
With Climate Scientism, the objective to dominate energy means that the real power structures in our world can manipulate the ‘commanding heights’ of just about everything that makes a modern society affluent and dynamic. As with Corona and ‘Health’, the religion of Climate has nothing to do with ‘science’. It is about power, mandates, money and a Federated NWO.
Scientism: Follow the money
According to the FT more than U$100 billion per annum is to be spent on international ‘Climate projects’. Most of this money is simply a transfer of funds from the G20 to ‘developing’ nations like India or China. But this underestimates the total amount of money on offer for ‘Climate initiatives’. According to the Brookings Institute the world spends some $20 Trillion per annum on ‘Sustainable Development Goals’. Most of these funds are not directly related to ‘Climate’ per se but at least U$ 1 Trillion would be directly attributable to ‘Climate action’, or ‘green projects’ related to ‘Climate’. It is a stupendous amount.
Given that the G20’s total economic size is ‘only’ U$ 26 Trillion per annum these numbers on SDG (sustainable development goals) and ‘Climate’ spending, are simply staggering. What can you buy with a $ 1 Trillion? Probably sanitation systems and clean water for most of Africa. Does anyone with an IQ over 70 really believe that spending more money, on ‘Climate action’, or increasing taxes on ‘carbon’ will lower the non-existing ‘global temperature threat’ by 1 C? Or is it more likely that the endless streams of these monies are ‘laundered’, taken, grafted, and abused by those within the ‘Climate action’ processes? Don’t all governments view ‘Climate’ as an endless source of potential taxation? Don’t the elite and their State allies engorge themselves on the same endless rivers of billions of dollars?
Outside of formal funding flows exist vast swathes of loan financing for ‘Climate projects’ for the great and good, such as the COP28 announcement that the UAE will provide some U$270 billion over a decade for ‘Climate action’. We can add in billions in ‘carbon trading’ that goes on in the G20, enriching millionaires and billionaires as the elite and fund managers ‘trade’ to reduce ‘carbon footprints’ (akin to the medieval payment of the indulgence tithe, where you could buy your way out of sin). Sundry other local, national and transnational financing exists for those who want to enter the ‘green’ game.
Simply put the ‘climate industry’ is big business, roughly constituting somewhere between a U$200 billion and U$ 1 Trillion per annum global market. It is now a larger market domain than the criminal mafia and Scientism called Pharmaceuticals which is a U$ 100 billion per annum revenue industry. Yet look at the power that Pharma wields over governments and ‘Health’ policy, soon to be further ennobled by the WHO’s 2024 pandemic treaty which effectively ends national sovereignty. Pharma literally owns governments, academics, agencies and most of the media. Why not Climate Scientism?
Given the massive extent of monies for ‘Climate action’, we would expect that such largesse would buy ‘democratic institutions’, agencies, regulators, universities and produce endless studies to ‘prove’ that the end of the world is just around the corner, or that mankind’s pernicious output of Co2 causes everything. The two-headed Satan of Pharma and Climate is a formidable and demonic monster to fight.
What is Climate? Not what the Scientism says it is
Climate can be defined as weather over a long period of time, namely 30-50 years. ‘Climate’ will vary by region and geography. There is no valid concept of a ‘global climate’ given the complexity of convection systems and the innumerable variables which cannot be modelled, that constitute local, regional and continental weather systems. For example, since 2019 some 350 peer reviewed studies have declared that no noticeable warming has gone on in the modern era, and human impact on natural cycles of Climate is negligible. Most don’t know this.
We need to bear in mind that weather measurements have only been in existence, in an on-going and verifiable manner, since the 1880s. Most of the globe is uncovered by temperature reading instrumentation, including the oceans. Only recently were liquid thermometers replaced by more modern electronic and digital instrumentation which record temperatures at a more granular level. Many temperature reading sites are old, thermometer based, situated in urban heat sinks including airports, which fraudulently increasing surface temperature measurements. Therefore, it is silly and criminal to pass judgements on ‘climate’ and issue climate-geddon forecasts based on inaccurate, sparse, fraudulent and recent data sets.
Longer age temperature measurements using ice core sampling clearly indicate that Co2 has no correlation with temperatures and in fact lags temperature by hundreds of years (sources at the end). Outside of cautiously interpreted ice core sampling, the best evidence for past regional ‘Climate’ and weather is that of written records. These elaborate clear natural, cyclical patterns from the Roman to the early modern eras. Extant and detailed records over 2000 years indicate that Co2 has no role to play in natural climate variation and that all manner of phenomena has been experienced by humans when Co2 levels were lower than today.
Frauds
Since the Climate cult cannot explain the Medieval Warming Period (900-1300 A.D.) or the Medieval ‘Little Ice Age’ (1350-1800 A.D.), they simply and criminally airbrush both from the record. Apparently, they never existed or if they did, it was ‘local’ and of no great importance. They then create a temperature history so that the medieval era (500-1500 A.D) and the 1945-1975 global cooling frenzy are now forgotten and flattened to provide a ‘hockey stick’ graph of spiking 20th and 21rst century temperatures.
Mann et al’s fraudulent tree-ring circus of 1998, based on 3 tree samples (2 pines and 1 cedar), which purportedly erased the medieval warming period (an objective of this corrupt cabal) is one example of criminal malpractice and the abuse of dendrology, itself a non-science riven with assumptions and problems (see Steyn’s great book, ‘A Disgrace to the Profession’). The peasant has also observed that Michael Mann is a tenured professor at the University of Pennsylvania earing U$1 million per annum and has a net worth in the many millions. Corruption and data fraud pay well it appears.
Climate-Gate revealed the depravity and criminality of a small group of US and UK based ‘researchers’ as they sought to rewrite climate-records and ‘hide the decline’ of temperatures from 1945-1975. The Hockey Stick fraud and ‘Climate Gate’ reveal this cult for what it really is.
Co2 and Climate
(The Inconvenient warming ‘pause’ that will soon be rewritten)
95% of plant food is emitted by Gaia but for some reason it is only the 5% emitted by humans which deranges Gaia through word-salads like ‘radiation refraction’ and ‘the greenhouse effect’. The human emission of CO2 is 4-5% of the total, or 20 parts per million of all atmospheric gases. It is not even worth worrying about. To say otherwise is anti-science.
To state that Climate is dependent on CO2 output is also anti-science. CO2 falls naturally out of climate processes. It is a part of the carbon cycle, a natural fact taught to 12-year-olds in most countries. There cannot be a ‘greenhouse’ effect because the Earth is an open, not a closed system. This means that there is no ‘layering’ or blanketing of the Earth’s 12 layered and complicated atmosphere by carbon dioxide. The exaggerated, linear and amplified ‘greenhouse’ effect, sold to the masses, is also anti-science.
To wit, “Water vapour is a more important greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide, and as its atmospheric concentration can vary rapidly, it could have been a major trigger or amplifier in many sudden climate changes..” (Thompson et al. 1995). Water vapour constitutes some 95% of ‘greenhouse gases’, why not target water for reduction and net-zero?
Greenhouse nonsense and Planck’s Law
(CO2- Endothermic and Exothermic convection systems)
CO2 has little to do with ‘heat accumulation and energy radiation’ if we look at the real science of spectral bands, Planck’s law and absorption.
1) Molecules in the atmosphere absorb light waves over what are called spectral bands. Spectral band absorption in the atmosphere can be quantified based on measurements over a certain distance through the atmosphere (eg 300 m above sea level).
2) The Earth emits a spectrum, or wavelength continuum, of radiation that is described by Planck’s Law, which has been validated by experimental data for over a hundred years.
3) There are two spectral bands in which the CO2 molecule absorbs infrared radiation. The first band is in what is called the Medium Wave InfraRed (MWIR) spectrum, and the second spectral band is in the Light Wave Infrared spectrum, or LWIR. The LWIR band is the most important in the absorption of infrared radiation (see the IR Handbook).
4) In the LWIR absorption band of CO2 (centre wavelength of 15 microns) the transmission measured is 0.0 due to CO2 absorption. This means a total of 100% absorption over 300 meters at sea level, within the spectral absorption band of CO2, that would capture the most energy, or “heat”, being radiated by the earth’s surface.
Based on the above science, CO2 absorption of 'heat' is both a myth and unimportant in climatic variation. You cannot go beyond 100% heat absorption, yet that is what the Climate Cult is trying to sell with its inflated absorption rates. Within LWIR there is a ‘limit’ on CO2 heat absorption, claiming otherwise is anti-science and ignores that most of the CO2 is recycled and reused anyway.
CO2 is also exothermic, meaning it has both ‘warming’ (endothermic) and ‘cooling’ (heat reduction) properties. Co2 is not a unidirectional ‘heat trapper’. It does not create a warm blanket. It can absorb energy up to 100% of its mole fraction weight, but it also demonstrates cooling attributes.
At higher altitudes NASA has publicly admitted that CO2 is a ‘cooling agent’. Given that ‘Not A Space Agency’ (for the moon fraud see here), is also a prime beneficiary and promoter of Climate nonsense, the fact that CO2 has cooling properties within the LWIR and at higher altitudes is a rather large inconvenient truth. In other words, the net effect of CO2 on anything is negligible at best.
Money, fraud and economic reality
· The Climate industry is a ~$200 billion to $1 Trillion p.a. market (all funds, grants, subsidies, contracts, tax-deductions, products, carbon trading and other sources combined)
· Over 6000 consumable products are manufactured using hydro-carbon energy and contain carbon, are these to be outlawed and if so, replaced by what?
· How will electric batteries power modern ships, containers, trucks and transport? What will be the impact on trade? Will sailing ships return? Will long distance transport simply disappear due to the cost and ineffectiveness of EVs?
· If you erased the UK, US and Canada from existence – what impact would this have on ‘weather’ or ‘Climate’? Would the ‘Climate’ suddenly revert to 21 C year-round, balmy, slight breeze from the West? Or would nothing change?
· There are not enough mineral deposits in our planet to build a green-tech infrastructure to replace our current hydrocarbon-based infrastructure (summary of this in the next post)
· Bird Choppers, solar panels and EVs all use carbon (see list of materials per technology in the next post); bird choppers require 350 tonnes of steel to build and consume 700g of oil every 6 months
· CO2 is reused and recycled naturally, it is not a blanket, even if we doubled the 400 parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere, nothing would happen (SchildKnecht https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.00708.pdf: ‘We find an equilibrium climate sensitivity (temperature increase ∆T due to doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration) of ∆T ≃ 0.5°C.’)
· Solar radiation, magnetic reversals, oceanic patterns, and volcanic activity are of prime important and almost immune to precise modelling
· Milankovitch climate cycles, based on changes in the Earth’s orbit and obliquity, stretching from 95.000 to 180.000 years or more and which are naturally recurring, seem to be a better deductive model for climate variation than plant food and are not modelled or considered
· Since 1860 there has been observed a 95 percent correlation between Earth's temperatures and Sunspots. There is virtually no correlation between our temperatures and CO2 in the atmosphere (Singer, Avery, 1998)
· Over the long duration of human history no ‘warming’ can be detected from human activity, thus no ‘crisis’ exists (natural cyclic processes dominate) (spot the non-existing trend below)
· The Roman era was much warmer than the present era (lower Co2 levels)
· ~1000-1150 A.D. was much warmer than the present era (lower Co2 levels)
· ~1300-1800 A.D. was much colder than the present era (lower Co2 levels)
· Rewriting the temperature record is a common and quite criminal act (NASA, GISS et al), namely depressing the historical temperature record and elevating the recent (example giff below from Tony Heller’s realclimatescience.com site of NASA changing the temperatures to flatten the 1930s and early 40s which were much hotter than current temps)
· Climate-gate emails (2 dumps) prove that the UN-IPCC climate process is corrupt and fraudulent, controlled by a small group of researchers better defined as activists who benefit from their own shrill anti-science claims
· Climate models are notoriously poor, and fail peer reviews from IT experts, minimising or ignoring the impact of cloud cover, oceanic movements, solar activity, Milankovitch cycles and other natural phenomena (e volcanoes, oceanic cycles)
· Beaufort Gyre and other natural processes (Gulf stream, wind currents, oscillations, underseas volcanoes) affect the Arctic and Antarctic not human activity, but these are not modelled nor even discussed by the Climate catastrophists
· Temperature readings in the limited number of stations available are usually sited in urban heat zones, including highways and airports, many are old and of poor quality creating artificially high readings
· The hockey stick from Mann et al which erases the medieval warming and cooling periods is a well-known fraud
· NOAA and NASA raw temperature data indicates a general US cooling trend since 1880 (David Craig, p. 181)
All of the above prove that Climate Scientism is a fraud and a cult. Occam’s razor needs to be used. What then is the purpose of this non-science?
Climate and the NWO
The end game is money and for the Deep State the gradual reduction of civilisation and the establishment of some sort of global-feudal Scientism. What is the point of a Federated-NWO? A good question. No one really knows but some objectives for the US Deep State and its corporate, governmental, and non-governmental allies could include:
· a massive reduction in the human population thereby ‘saving’ the planet,
· the energetic commitment to ‘evolution’ and the ‘next phase’ of human history, namely the salvation of Gaia and our species,
· the control and reduction of food supply (outlawing meat for example by declaring husbandry antagonistic to ‘Climate goals’),
· the restoration of nature and the eradication of other faiths and religions through the elevation of the Churches of ‘Reason’ and ‘Science’,
· the ability to develop transhumanist technology through forced gene-altering injections some of which will be related to Climate ‘change’ and related plagues,
· the crippling and eventual elimination of national and regional rivals to a US-led NWO,
· achieving unbounded power of a global empire with more reach and depth than what currently exists, with the capability to micro-manage all aspects of society (net zero, 15-minute cities, carbon-footprint digital IDs etc),
· the ennoblement of a small and perfect global elite divinely ordained to rule and profit,
· the manufacture of unbelievable wealth and power for the few,
· global Scientism and its perverted Fascist program of governance and control (Plato’s technocratic elite)
There are many objectives involving many actors. A ‘permanent’ Federated NWO is more easily accomplished with a smaller, compliant, drug addled, injected, fearful, poorer, closely managed, technologically controlled global humanity. Climate and Corona are twin Fascisms (Corporatism) joined at the hip with a purpose to impose a Federated NWO all based on ‘science’ or, the Church of Scientism. A permanent ‘Climate crisis’ is essential to instil fear and self-loathing in a secular and materialistic culture. Nothing sells governmental power better than fear, based on an emergency or a ‘war’ to save Gaia or civilisation. All of this can be summarised as a satanic and demonic program.
Bottom Line
This post has listed some of an almost endless number of reasons why the Climate cult is deranged, criminal and evil. In summary there is no ‘Climate crisis’ from human emitted plant food.
1. Natural cycles including Sunspot activity, drive our climate which varies by region and location depending on the multi-variate relationships within the convective systems at work.
2. The Earth’s orbit, its tilt and obliquity and the resulting relationship with the Sun, are prime drivers of climate and indeed ice ages.
3. In reality, the miracle of nature and its creation is the remarkable stability of our current climate system (we should rejoice and be happy that this is not 1500 B.C. or 750 B.C. where global cataclysms upended our planet).
4. The entire point of Climate Fascism (Corporatism) is to chase Trillions in funding and impose transnational governance over energy. Control energy and you control ‘the heights’ of civilisation.
If you erased all the G20 countries tomorrow morning, there would be no impact whatsoever on ‘Climate’ or weather. None.
Anyone with a modicum of common sense knows that without clean burning hydrocarbon energy, modern societies will simply collapse. The impact on human society from ‘net zero’ and other inane, immoral targets cannot be over-stated. Billions will be thrust back into poverty, and many will simply die from the age-old curses of starvation, insufficient energy, heating, power, and sanitation.
The next post will outline ‘green’ technology’s dependency on hydrocarbons. The one after that will go through past predictions on ‘climate’ starting in 1880 and list the key ones made every decade. They have all been proven to be spectacularly wrong and so grossly inaccurate that only the brainwashed and corrupted could possibly believe in anything ‘The Science’ around ‘climate’ proffers.
Petit et all 1999 — analysed 420,000 years of Vostok and found that as the world cools into an ice age, the delay before carbon falls is several thousand years.
Fischer et al 1999 — described a lag of 600 plus or minus 400 years as the world warms up from an ice age.
Monnin et al 2001 – looked at Dome Concordia (also in Antarctica) – and found a delay on the recent rise out of the last major ice age to be 800 ± 600
Mudelsee (2001) - Over the full 420,000 year Vostok history Co2 variations lag temperature by 1,300 years ± 1000.
Caillon et al 2003 analysed the Vostok data and found a lag (where CO2 rises after temperature) of 800 ± 200 years.
Excellent summary of the papers on the lag at CO2 science.
