Thank you for your work. Right now I am extremely sick (not from the jabs) and busy. But I hope that one day I will be able to collect all your writing to pass them to my children when they will be older.
I am a very traditional Buddhist, and it makes me crazy the Dalai Lama position on science...and the garbage the government school is teaching to my kids (I live in a monastic school).
As a child I always wondered how was possible that millions of "transition" animals had disappeared without leaving behind a single fossil (I used to go hunting fossils with my mother). And Iater I was doubting about why some apes decided to evolve and some not? It sounded fishy.
Thanks Dave, yes you are spot on. Statism and its 'science'. Darwin like Jenner was not a 'scientist', had no credentials, no experiments, no proofs for his theory, no observational data, no metrics. Nothing. But the government bought in and used it for its own purposes. Darwin's work is best classed as metaphysics, based on plagiarised material from others, and hearkening back to ancient Greece where they mused over abiogenesis and changeable life forms. As Dawkins (who is a 1920s 'positivist' philosopher and not a scientist) said, Darwinism gave Atheism a 'fulfilling' religious framework of belief. Ironically Chuck died as a quasi-believing Christian, so he was mentally between 2 stools and given the limitless errors of his work, quite a confused if not mentally unwell pigeon-breeder.
Thank you for your work. Right now I am extremely sick (not from the jabs) and busy. But I hope that one day I will be able to collect all your writing to pass them to my children when they will be older.
I am a very traditional Buddhist, and it makes me crazy the Dalai Lama position on science...and the garbage the government school is teaching to my kids (I live in a monastic school).
As a child I always wondered how was possible that millions of "transition" animals had disappeared without leaving behind a single fossil (I used to go hunting fossils with my mother). And Iater I was doubting about why some apes decided to evolve and some not? It sounded fishy.
Thank you again
Niki
Thanks Dave, yes you are spot on. Statism and its 'science'. Darwin like Jenner was not a 'scientist', had no credentials, no experiments, no proofs for his theory, no observational data, no metrics. Nothing. But the government bought in and used it for its own purposes. Darwin's work is best classed as metaphysics, based on plagiarised material from others, and hearkening back to ancient Greece where they mused over abiogenesis and changeable life forms. As Dawkins (who is a 1920s 'positivist' philosopher and not a scientist) said, Darwinism gave Atheism a 'fulfilling' religious framework of belief. Ironically Chuck died as a quasi-believing Christian, so he was mentally between 2 stools and given the limitless errors of his work, quite a confused if not mentally unwell pigeon-breeder.