E=mc2 is incorrect. Plasma, Positrons and the Aether.
Matter cannot be created ex-nihilo. Photons in motion have mass. Plasma and the aether exist. The Einstotle was wrong. The equation is wrong.
Carrying on from previous discussions about the reality of the aether, we can now fire an arrow of common sense and pierce the heart of the world’s most over-used equation: E = mc2. It is not just the aether which confounds this equation, but also light speed. Einstein takes credit for something he did not invent, and for something which is wrong. He knew that light speed was variant.
“Einstein continues: “In a similar manner we see ‘unmittelbar’ [immediately] that the principle of the constancy of the velocity of light in a vacuum must be modified. For one easily recognizes that the path of a beam of light, relative to K’, must generally be crooked, when the light, with respect to K, moves in a straight line with definite constant velocity”
….The word ‘unmittelbar’ amused me so much that I have taken care to give it in the original German….The whole paragraph is interesting because it goes on to deal with one of the profound discoveries of Relativity, that the velocity of light in reference to a body is the same whether that body be at rest, or in motion towards the source of light!
…I notice for the moment that Einstein, having postulated the constancy of light, is content to “modify” it when his own reasoning leads him to contradiction; but he does not touch the previous mode of thought that led him to decree this constancy.”
(The Case Against Einstein, Arthur Lynch, pp. 209-210)
Einstein the wizard. He admits that the speed of light in reality, is inconstant. But as Lynch the engineer says above, he never amends his equations and he never takes this fact to its logical conclusion, namely, that Relatively is disproven. One of the key postulates of his theory is light speed invariance. If we remove that, we nullify his theory. Sagnac, Michelson, Miller and many other practical experimenters had already disproven this by 1920.
‘The’ Equation
Pace Scientistic theology, energy = mass (x) the speed of light squared, so we are told. We know that the speed of light is variant so this equation is wrong. But there are many other problems with this equation, which Einstein did not invent, but interpreted as part of his fantasy world of Relativity.
Prior to Einstotle, various physicists including Isaac Newton, Henri Poincaré, Olinto De Pretto, Max Born, and James C. Maxwell had proposed the equation or something similar. Friedrich Hasenorhl for example, had formulated E = 3/4 mc2 or E = 3/8 mc2 long before Einstein look into energy equivalency with matter.
In 1905, the same year he received a PhD from the University of Zurich, Albert Einstein developed his famous equation of mass-energy equivalence (E = mc2), which later became known as the theory of special relativity. The only variables in this equation are energy (E), mass (m), and the speed of light (c). Time is not a factor.
Einstein derived the equation starting from the result of relativistic variation of light energy. He appropriated the equation and its concepts without due attribution – which was a distinctive Einsteinian feature. Why bother acknowledging the work of others? He rarely if ever did. Erroneously assuming that ‘relativity was proven’ given the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment, Einstein then built his theory and conjectured that energy and matter were ‘relatively’ equivalent. He never experimentally proved this. Nuclear fission has nothing to do with this equation.
E = mc2 is a central tenet of STR or Special Relativity Theory.
The equation is incorrect and this is well known to ‘science’.
Energy = what?
The equation E = mc2 gives the amount of energy E which can be obtained, if a mass m is completely turned into energy. According to this equation matter is literally created out of nothing. There is no proof whatsoever that matter can arise from nothing, and this contradicts the first law of thermodynamics. So here we have Einstein and STR in direct opposition to a known and proven scientific principle.
The first law of thermodynamics, also known as the law of conservation of energy, states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but it can be changed from one form to another.
Matter cannot simply be created out of nothing. For the equation to work, m must be defined and its origination declared. The equation achieves neither.
Actual Science
Let’s consider actual physical science not theory.
1 ) The relation of energy and mass can be turned around.
If two gamma rays with total energy E collide, they may produce a mass m.
2 ) However, we know that visible light cannot turn into matter because there are no particles with small enough masses.
E = mc2 is only possible if particles whose masses are m or less can be created. This is not possible. The smallest-mass particles are electrons (negatively charged) and positrons (positively charged), each with a mass corresponding to 0.511 MeV of energy.
So how is mass created? Let us now return to the unknown American physicist Carl Anderson.
Anderson and his positrons nullfies E=mc2
We know that the discovery of positrons or positively charged electrons, created through radiative energy proved an aether. ‘The Science’ simply ignored this experimental fact (1932). Another reason why ‘The Science’ tried to disprove Anderson’s 1932 experiment was that the famous E = mc2 would also be proven wrong, or would need entirely new explanations, independent of Lorentz’s complex transformation equations, or Einstein’s religious and incorrect canons of tensor calculus. These alternative explanations would have to be real - physical, mechanical, and anti-Relativistic. Namely:
· energy (E) is absorbed into open space,
· this results in the release of a mass of electrons and positrons (or various other possible particles),
· and these can then be multiplied by the square of the speed of light to calculate the total amount of energy absorbed, where the speed of light as we know, is variant not a constant (see Sagnac, 1913)
If we accept Anderson’s experiment (since confirmed many times over), we can arrive at E = mc2 by a simple algebraic proportion based on the above (See Simhony, pp. 172-175)1
‘Plasma’ physics, which is another description of the positron model, has demonstrated that electropon pairs play an important role in almost every phenomenon in the cosmos, including stars, neutron-stars, pulsars, quasars and gamma-ray bursters (Green, 1998).
No hocus pocus is needed if we accept positron evidence. The origin of inertia for example could be explained quite simply, since around every micro and macro-object there are billions of electropon pairs, which vibrate at a frequency proportional to the velocity of the object. Plasma physics would also explain the effect of gravity.
Let us now list some other objections to the dogma that E = mc2
Error #1: Einstein rejects basic kinetics
Einstein’s general interpretation, kE=MC2 defines a relationship between mass and kinetic energy.
1. when a body of mass is accelerated it gains mass and energy
2. when a body of mass is decelerated it loses mass and energy
3. the mass increase/decrease for all matter is proportional to each body’s kinetic energy (relative to a common position of rest for all matter)
We know that bodies in motion possess both Joules of kinetic energy and Joules of kinetic mass. If the body in motion slows down, it will be losing kinetic energy, and Joules. Its mass should therefore decrease as well. Einstein refused to accept this.
Einstein did not believe in deceleration to be a meaningful measurement or concept which can be independently differentiated from an acceleration. He also did not believe that an absolute position of rest could be determined because the mass changes caused by motion, in his view, can never be measured locally.
He is wrong.
Error #2: Einstein did not understand that photons have mass
Einstein’s did not understand that the primary meaning of E = mc2 is to define the mass of photons (light) as the truest measure of a mass (the base as it were of mass measurement).
Einstein arbitrarily declared that the photon was a particle without mass.
This error now permeates all of science. It is absurd. A particle with no mass would have no momentum or motion. In fact it would not exist. Relativists now say that photons have no rest mass, but photons are in fact never at rest! So this is again quite absurd.
All particles have mass. Photons have a mass of at least 10-50 kg.
Mass and energy are the two primary parameters of both matter and photons. One cannot exist without the other. There is no such thing as the long cherished metaphysical idea of ‘pure energy’.
Einstein is wrong.
Error #3: Einstein did not understand anti-matter
Positrons and anti-matter exist and Einstein could never wrap his head around the concept that antimatter and positrons were the latticework of space. Space has never been a ‘vacuum’. Space is full of antimatter and positrons which are real particles with real mass. This means that matter cannot be converted into energy.
How does this work?
· Photons are produced by atoms
· Photons are made from equal pieces of positive matter (proton) and negative matter (electron).
· Neither a proton nor an electron can produce a photon by itself
· A photon is the result of a joint effort between a proton and an electron with each contributing an equal amount of their mass and energy to make the photon
There is no way to convert ordinary matter into photons except in the extremely small quantities produced by atomic radiation.
Einstein is wrong.
Error #4: Einstein never proved relative motion
Einstein failed to understand that all photons travel at C, the speed of light which we know can vary through the aether, via the same inertial reference frame (inertial meaning the existing motion of the object) and not just relative to observers. Einstein made the speed of light relative to the observer’s frame.
While it is true, as Einstein claimed, that all observers will measure the speed of light to be (c) in any frame, it is not true they measure the same quantity.
Einstein is wrong.
A more accurate equation
The equation needs to be rearranged.
· M=E/C2 defines a body of matter’s excess mass associated with its absolute motion through rest
· When a body of matter is accelerated to any velocity (v) relative to this frame, its mass increases with its kinetic energy KE=MC2
· At a velocity of about 86% of the speed of light, a body’s mass is doubled with a kinetic mass that is equal to its rest mass (theory based)
If we rework the equation based on the above we obtain something like:
E2 = m2*C4 + p2*c2 (p is the momentum of the particle, a measure of its motion)
E represents the total energy of a particle; m represents the rest mass of the particle; c represents the speed of light (which is variant in reality); p represents the momentum of the particle
This equation provides a more complete and accurate picture of the relationship between energy, mass, and momentum.
Mass is a constant regardless of location. It's measured in kilograms (kg).
Weight is related to mass, and is the force of gravity acting on an object's mass. Weight is measured in newtons (N).
The above can only occur within a single frame of reference for all matter. We know that matter gains mass when it is accelerated, and it also gives up that mass when it is decelerated. All photons and all electrons in a given reference frame have identical masses.
Einstein is wrong.
In fact, Relativity is so ridiculous it claims that a human, travelling at 86% of the speed of light, will shrink to be 2 inches high and 2 feet wide. At high velocities mass should increase not distort along its length.
Bottom Line
Einstotle has led ‘science’ down cul de sacs. The canonical equation E = mc2 is wrong. The most basic mistakes were made by Einstein, namely, by using the Doppler effect he concluded that all motion itself was intrinsically relative. Einstein failed to believe in a fixed frame that connected all forms of motion. However, with a more careful look at the Doppler effect, one must conclude that a common absolute motion for all photons must exist. Further:
We know that positrons and anti-matter exist and contain a mass.
We know that photons have a mass and are created by the interaction of positrons and electrons (denied by Einstein).
We know that matter cannot be created, as declared by Einstotle, ex-nihilo.
We know that the equation itself is wrong, and that matter gains mass when it is accelerated, and gives up that mass when it is decelerated. Einstein rejected this.
We also know that all photons and all electrons in a given reference frame have identical masses. Einstein did not believe in this.
So what do we do? We follow the incorrect physics of Einstotle, retarding real scientific understanding. This is probably not a surprise given we live in a world where Sheeple went off braying for a poisoned injection against a non-existent ‘bat virus’, wearing a face diaper, whimpering accolades to pharma and ‘The Science’.
All hail.
1If the product 300,000 km/sec is caused by the velocity (v) of the wave motion of the electropon lattice, then v = (E/m)½ where m equals the mass of the electron or positron (9.1× 10-31 kg), and E is the binding energy per particle (511,000 eV or 8.2 × 10-14 joules), the equation is: v = (8.2 × 10-14 joules/ 9.1 × 10-31 kg)½ = (9 × 1016 m2/s2)½ = 3 × 108 m/s = 300,000 km/s = c, the accepted “speed” of light. Since c = v in v = (E/m)½, then E = mc2. (See M. Simhony, An Invitation to the Natural Physics of Matter, Space, Radiation, Singapore, New Jersey: World Scientific, 1994, pp. 172-175).
Sources
Robert Crease and Charles Mann, “Uncertainty and Complimentarity,” World Treasury of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, ed., T. Ferris, 1991.
James Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 1873
Jonathan Katz, The Biggest Bangs, 1999
Paul A. M. Dirac, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 117, 610 1928
World Treasury of Physics, Astronomy and Mathematics, ed., T. Ferris, 1991
Stephen Hawking, Black Holes and Baby Universes, 2011
M. Simhony, An Invitation to the Natural Physics of Matter, Space, Radiation, Singapore, New Jersey: World Scientific, 1994
Electron-Positron Physics at the Z, “Series in High Energy Physics, Cosmology and Gravitation,” M. G. Green, Royal Holloway and Bedford College, UK, January 1998
Robert B. Laughlin, A Different Universe, 2005
I suspect that you are using 'pace' to mean 'following'. But it's not. I think you mean 'a la'.