Physical evidence, including magnetism, nullifies Relativity. Einstein never deployed physical experimentation. Everything was a philosophical thought experiment and mathematical sophistry.
Excellent post. One of your best. I had no idea about the different effect caused by a magnet moving relative to a conductor and a conductor moving relative to a magnet. No idea that velocity was death to relativists. No idea that Einstein could not bare that contradiction so mathematically altered reality without an experiment in sight. It is amazing how your posts allow me to connect dots I have not been able to for decades ( but suspected) since I was not prepared to put up with Wikipedia/ Britannica style circumlocutious obfuscation for more than a few paragraphs. For about the past 40 years I have been a science sceptic for the last thirty almost a science heretic and since convid 19 and reading your excellent posts a full blown, unashamed, proud, science denier. If the whole of science could somehow magically be removed from the human history just think how much better good old planet earth would be. I recall asking my physics teacher in 1974 what was the difference between weight and mass and was told to stop asking stupid questions. Ever since that day I have believed most of physics is bunkum - certainly the big stuff. He had no idea, of course. All those years of warp drive and black holes and faster than light drive and cats leaping out of boxes they are not actually in and so on. Utter rubbish. In the philosophy department we had to read Hegel's Philosophy of Right and let me assure you that even Plotkin's Vaccines is an easy read next to Hegel. This reading alerted my "nonsense" sense. I concluded that if I - a reasonably intelligent reader - could not understand what he was reading, it must be because it does not mean anything. Einstein falls into this category. Your views in my view are correct - we are indeed now all unwitting victims of a new religion of science whose chief acolytes are medical doctors and whose purpose is the keep the evil empire ruling the world at all costs - including murdering us all with forced injections - if deemed necessary for the "public" good.
Thanks David. Glad they help. As you said so much formal education does not teach anything except the utter confusion that passes for science. And what really is annoying is that technology, say building a car, is somehow equated with 'science'. The two have nothing to do with each other. At Salisbury Cathedral I paced out the nave - it is perfectly symmetrical. It is 800 years old. The design and mathematics involved are from human reason, logic, experience. The architect was not waiting for 'The Science' to tell him what to do or believe. Physics, 'virology', 'climate', 'evolution', etc the word salads choke you to death.
"I recall asking my physics teacher in 1974 what was the difference between weight and mass and was told to stop asking stupid questions. Ever since that day I have believed most of physics is bunkum - certainly the big stuff. He had no idea, of course. All those years of warp drive and black holes and faster than light drive and cats leaping out of boxes they are not actually in and so on. Utter rubbish"
Classic. I remember my physics teacher also taught phys-ed :) It was hopeless. The maths teacher simply could not teach, most of his students were near failures. They simply don't understand the topics and repeat state created syllabuses and material. Black holes etc - I was reading endless 'scientific' articles on this - even Hawking the Black hole king admitted they don't really exist, but nary a dissenting voice to be found within accepted circles.
Agreed. Maths was a farce at my school too. Most of it was memorize and repeat. No actual education at all. A senior fellow at Cambridge told me, off the record, some years back that most insiders he knew thought Hawking was fake news. We do not know what is five miles beneath our feet but we know how the universe works because of experimentless mathematical theories!?. I don't think so. On Salisbury Cathedral check out the stone boxes at Saqqara in Egypt. The ancients had superior knowledge to us in many areas and were less prejudiced and more open minded. Durant informs us in his monumental Story of Civilization, 1932, Our Oriental Heritage, that the clever old Chinese liked western surgery and adopted it but had little time for our so called modern ideas about infectious disease or drugs, preferring their time honored traditional remedies. Would you trust a western doctor now after what just happened and the behavior of most of them?
Victorians knew that doctors were quacks. St Jenner was called such, as his poisons murdered thousands of children, or as he said in his letters, 'I am beset with difficulties'. I guess so, given his ideas led directly to the 1870-72 'smallpox' disaster (after 70 years of quacking). He and his Royal Society chums did of course pocket some £3 mn in today's money for the smallpox quackcine (tainted with mercury and other chemicals). Chinese-Hindu's have a greater respect for naturopathy than Westerners. The Corona Fascism revealed just how dumb most of the population is and how divorced from any comprehension of reality most of the pop is.
Interesting that your maths teacher admitted the obvious about Saint Hawking. Black Holes - if true it would nullify physical reality (singularities are impossible, Hawking even said so and wrote that Relativity was wrong). But it was invoked to explain 'multi verses' and the creation of this universe. Anything to avoid the obvious. :)
People buy it, read it, quote from it, and present themselves as uber intelligent and sophisticated :) It really is just philosophy. A lot of science fiction pretending to be fact.
Crothers, S.J. Proof that Einstein’s field equations are invalid: Exposition of the unimodular defect, Physics Essays, Volume 34: Pages 420-428, 2021. Received: July 8, 2021; Accepted: August 14, 2021; Published Online: September 17, 2021
Albert Einstein first presented his gravitational field equations in unimodular coordinates. In these coordinates, the field equations can be written explicitly in terms of the Einstein pseudotensor for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field. Since this pseudotensor produces, by contraction, a first-order intrinsic differential invariant, it violates the rules of pure mathematics. This is sufficient to prove that Einstein's unimodular field equations are invalid. Since the unimodular form must hold in the General Theory of Relativity, it follows that the latter is also unsound, lacking a proper mathematical foundation.
ABSTRACT. The Special Theory of Relativity demands, by Einstein’s two postulates (i) the Principle of Relativity and (ii) the constancy of the speed of light in vacuum, that a spherical wave of light in one inertial system transforms, via the Lorentz Transformation, into a spherical wave of light (the Lorentz sphere) in another inertial system when the systems are in constant relative rectilinear motion. However, the Lorentz Transformation in fact transforms a spherical wave of light into a translated ellipsoidal wave of light even though the speed of light in vacuum is invariant. The Special Theory of Relativity is logically inconsistent and therefore invalid.
Yes it is possible Einstein did not really understand Maxwell's equations. He took them, beat them, terrified them, cut out the Aether and repositioned them. For some reason this was deemed 'scientific'. No experiments were used to prove the equations....
Theories on the Aether and the contradictions between Maxwell’s equations and Einstein’s ToR lead to the conclusion that Relativity was promoted dishonestly and politically. Meanwhile, the academic establishment of the day stood on the brakes, driving the the science of electromagnetism to a side track, declaring motors, generators, and radios as “settled science” and condemning any further theoretical science or experimentation into EM fields and waves as off limits. Why? How about this… Recent release of batch loads of secret CIA files related to the JFK assassination are bringing many seemingly unrelated things to light. One of them being an admission by a talkative contractor that “the government can and has put entire areas of math and science off limits for study for national security reasons.” This revelation doesn’t clear anything up with regard to Aether, gravity, and EM, but it does give one pause…..
Thanks for the note. Yes the government is not the angel of light its supporters believe. This would extend to 9-11, the moon 'landings', JFK, the endless wars, the Rona plandemic etc. Evil exists in this world. It takes different shapes and forms. Tesla's documents were collected by the FBI upon his death. He had designs on 'anti gravity' machines and the use of natural electromagnetism to generate energy (now used in DEW). None of those documents are available. We see the financing of certain 'science' to push a particular narrative - 'climate', 'boiling', 'genders', 'virology', 'evolution' etc. None of these are scientific, they are philosophies with a purpose. Denying an aether achieves many objectives in this regard and allows 'them' to conjure up sci-fi as 'science' and set up high priests to interpret the bafflegab. 'Science' controlled by government. Nothing has changed since the days of Sargon 'the Great'.
I have enjoyed reading your posts and although much of this stuff is over my head I kind of hope you’re right. But if you are correct, I struggle to understand how it is we experience seasons and the diurnal cycle of day & night if the Earth is immobile and does not rotate,titled around its axis. Grateful if you would explain how these phenomena occur in the way that they do. Many thanks.
I am not saying the Earth does not rotate. It certainly is not flat. I am saying no mechanical proof exists that it rotates or moves through the cosmos. A future post will explain how immobility can be explained using physics. Obviously the Tychonic system also explains seasons and does so using standard maths and physics, even Relativity. I am also saying that Relativity explains nothing. Copernicanism is still best explained by Newton and Kepler's maths that he stole from Brahe (he probably killed him). The corruption of science is based on claims with no proofs. Nothing in history was built by 'science'. Theories must always follow facts. The issue with Relativity and a large part of QM is that it leads to a fantasy world devoid of common sense or logic.
I too asked about weight versus mass. I have known that something was wrong about black holes, wormholes, and even einstein. I never wanted to study his weird equations. How can my weight be related to light, to how fast light moved? There are so many basic observations that bring into question 'gravity' (mercury liquid keeps an anvil on its surface - relative density explains this - not bend in space time), as well as the dumb observer on a train word play.
--
I personally am on a quest for absolute fixed 'truths.' For me:
[1] The Creator is good, therefor any religious claims that some 'god' told them to kill others is bunk
[2] Man and woman are essential for each other, and yet there is a hierarchy and gender differences
[3] Be good to all created beings; other humans, mammals, reptiles, bugs, bacteria, water, trees, air
[4] When learning, only accept new information that is in line with the above (be good to all created beings, which include your neighbour AND yourself) [intentional confirmation bias]
Learning is to be good, and joyful, not tricky and self-centered (my group is best, and has special rights, others serve me ... even unto death). Learning is to be helpful - mathematics for its own 'glory' is trickery, math for quick aid to measure and build is useful and good. Let us stop worshiping math as an idol, let us bring back math to be a servant only.
[5]Let us look for trickery, where those spell castors ask us to believe without tests we can do ourselves. Where they say the 'proofs' are too far back in time, are too big for us to see, or too small, or require equipment vastly too expensive or exotic, where our own eyes prove their claim as false. Multi-genders, evolution, moving earth, virology, germs as contagious agents, interest and fractional reserve, chosen people and days and religions, murders disguised as righteousness, using any authority over our own tests which we need to do.
--
These all overlap and interweave. Einstein's frauds are in the same league as one group being better and more special than another, as well as choosing someone/some group to be our proxy instead of searching ourselves. Search for the root cause, not some gobblygook word salad with ample use of fear for heath issues.
Excellent post. One of your best. I had no idea about the different effect caused by a magnet moving relative to a conductor and a conductor moving relative to a magnet. No idea that velocity was death to relativists. No idea that Einstein could not bare that contradiction so mathematically altered reality without an experiment in sight. It is amazing how your posts allow me to connect dots I have not been able to for decades ( but suspected) since I was not prepared to put up with Wikipedia/ Britannica style circumlocutious obfuscation for more than a few paragraphs. For about the past 40 years I have been a science sceptic for the last thirty almost a science heretic and since convid 19 and reading your excellent posts a full blown, unashamed, proud, science denier. If the whole of science could somehow magically be removed from the human history just think how much better good old planet earth would be. I recall asking my physics teacher in 1974 what was the difference between weight and mass and was told to stop asking stupid questions. Ever since that day I have believed most of physics is bunkum - certainly the big stuff. He had no idea, of course. All those years of warp drive and black holes and faster than light drive and cats leaping out of boxes they are not actually in and so on. Utter rubbish. In the philosophy department we had to read Hegel's Philosophy of Right and let me assure you that even Plotkin's Vaccines is an easy read next to Hegel. This reading alerted my "nonsense" sense. I concluded that if I - a reasonably intelligent reader - could not understand what he was reading, it must be because it does not mean anything. Einstein falls into this category. Your views in my view are correct - we are indeed now all unwitting victims of a new religion of science whose chief acolytes are medical doctors and whose purpose is the keep the evil empire ruling the world at all costs - including murdering us all with forced injections - if deemed necessary for the "public" good.
Thanks David. Glad they help. As you said so much formal education does not teach anything except the utter confusion that passes for science. And what really is annoying is that technology, say building a car, is somehow equated with 'science'. The two have nothing to do with each other. At Salisbury Cathedral I paced out the nave - it is perfectly symmetrical. It is 800 years old. The design and mathematics involved are from human reason, logic, experience. The architect was not waiting for 'The Science' to tell him what to do or believe. Physics, 'virology', 'climate', 'evolution', etc the word salads choke you to death.
"I recall asking my physics teacher in 1974 what was the difference between weight and mass and was told to stop asking stupid questions. Ever since that day I have believed most of physics is bunkum - certainly the big stuff. He had no idea, of course. All those years of warp drive and black holes and faster than light drive and cats leaping out of boxes they are not actually in and so on. Utter rubbish"
Classic. I remember my physics teacher also taught phys-ed :) It was hopeless. The maths teacher simply could not teach, most of his students were near failures. They simply don't understand the topics and repeat state created syllabuses and material. Black holes etc - I was reading endless 'scientific' articles on this - even Hawking the Black hole king admitted they don't really exist, but nary a dissenting voice to be found within accepted circles.
Agreed. Maths was a farce at my school too. Most of it was memorize and repeat. No actual education at all. A senior fellow at Cambridge told me, off the record, some years back that most insiders he knew thought Hawking was fake news. We do not know what is five miles beneath our feet but we know how the universe works because of experimentless mathematical theories!?. I don't think so. On Salisbury Cathedral check out the stone boxes at Saqqara in Egypt. The ancients had superior knowledge to us in many areas and were less prejudiced and more open minded. Durant informs us in his monumental Story of Civilization, 1932, Our Oriental Heritage, that the clever old Chinese liked western surgery and adopted it but had little time for our so called modern ideas about infectious disease or drugs, preferring their time honored traditional remedies. Would you trust a western doctor now after what just happened and the behavior of most of them?
Victorians knew that doctors were quacks. St Jenner was called such, as his poisons murdered thousands of children, or as he said in his letters, 'I am beset with difficulties'. I guess so, given his ideas led directly to the 1870-72 'smallpox' disaster (after 70 years of quacking). He and his Royal Society chums did of course pocket some £3 mn in today's money for the smallpox quackcine (tainted with mercury and other chemicals). Chinese-Hindu's have a greater respect for naturopathy than Westerners. The Corona Fascism revealed just how dumb most of the population is and how divorced from any comprehension of reality most of the pop is.
Interesting that your maths teacher admitted the obvious about Saint Hawking. Black Holes - if true it would nullify physical reality (singularities are impossible, Hawking even said so and wrote that Relativity was wrong). But it was invoked to explain 'multi verses' and the creation of this universe. Anything to avoid the obvious. :)
A Brief History of Time was the most expensive and worst toilet paper I ever bought!
People buy it, read it, quote from it, and present themselves as uber intelligent and sophisticated :) It really is just philosophy. A lot of science fiction pretending to be fact.
Sad but true
Agreed. What bunkum.
I made this. medium.com/@enuminous
Crothers, S.J. Proof that Einstein’s field equations are invalid: Exposition of the unimodular defect, Physics Essays, Volume 34: Pages 420-428, 2021. Received: July 8, 2021; Accepted: August 14, 2021; Published Online: September 17, 2021
http://www.physicsessays.org/browse-journal-2/product/1896-2-stephen-j-crothers-proof-that-einstein-s-field-equations.html
https://vixra.org/pdf/2206.0082v1.pdf
Abstract:
Albert Einstein first presented his gravitational field equations in unimodular coordinates. In these coordinates, the field equations can be written explicitly in terms of the Einstein pseudotensor for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field. Since this pseudotensor produces, by contraction, a first-order intrinsic differential invariant, it violates the rules of pure mathematics. This is sufficient to prove that Einstein's unimodular field equations are invalid. Since the unimodular form must hold in the General Theory of Relativity, it follows that the latter is also unsound, lacking a proper mathematical foundation.
Thank you for this information! Will parse through it and post a summary. Looks great.
Crothers, S.J., Special Relativity and the Lorentz Sphere, Physics Essays, V.33, No.1, p.15,
2020, http://vixra.org/pdf/1911.0013v2.pdf
ABSTRACT. The Special Theory of Relativity demands, by Einstein’s two postulates (i) the Principle of Relativity and (ii) the constancy of the speed of light in vacuum, that a spherical wave of light in one inertial system transforms, via the Lorentz Transformation, into a spherical wave of light (the Lorentz sphere) in another inertial system when the systems are in constant relative rectilinear motion. However, the Lorentz Transformation in fact transforms a spherical wave of light into a translated ellipsoidal wave of light even though the speed of light in vacuum is invariant. The Special Theory of Relativity is logically inconsistent and therefore invalid.
https://physicsessays.org/browse-journal-2/product/1771-4-stephen-j-crothers-special-relativity-and-the-lorentz-sphere.html
Charlatan Einstein and his big tech buddies
Yes it is possible Einstein did not really understand Maxwell's equations. He took them, beat them, terrified them, cut out the Aether and repositioned them. For some reason this was deemed 'scientific'. No experiments were used to prove the equations....
Theories on the Aether and the contradictions between Maxwell’s equations and Einstein’s ToR lead to the conclusion that Relativity was promoted dishonestly and politically. Meanwhile, the academic establishment of the day stood on the brakes, driving the the science of electromagnetism to a side track, declaring motors, generators, and radios as “settled science” and condemning any further theoretical science or experimentation into EM fields and waves as off limits. Why? How about this… Recent release of batch loads of secret CIA files related to the JFK assassination are bringing many seemingly unrelated things to light. One of them being an admission by a talkative contractor that “the government can and has put entire areas of math and science off limits for study for national security reasons.” This revelation doesn’t clear anything up with regard to Aether, gravity, and EM, but it does give one pause…..
Thanks for the note. Yes the government is not the angel of light its supporters believe. This would extend to 9-11, the moon 'landings', JFK, the endless wars, the Rona plandemic etc. Evil exists in this world. It takes different shapes and forms. Tesla's documents were collected by the FBI upon his death. He had designs on 'anti gravity' machines and the use of natural electromagnetism to generate energy (now used in DEW). None of those documents are available. We see the financing of certain 'science' to push a particular narrative - 'climate', 'boiling', 'genders', 'virology', 'evolution' etc. None of these are scientific, they are philosophies with a purpose. Denying an aether achieves many objectives in this regard and allows 'them' to conjure up sci-fi as 'science' and set up high priests to interpret the bafflegab. 'Science' controlled by government. Nothing has changed since the days of Sargon 'the Great'.
I have enjoyed reading your posts and although much of this stuff is over my head I kind of hope you’re right. But if you are correct, I struggle to understand how it is we experience seasons and the diurnal cycle of day & night if the Earth is immobile and does not rotate,titled around its axis. Grateful if you would explain how these phenomena occur in the way that they do. Many thanks.
I am not saying the Earth does not rotate. It certainly is not flat. I am saying no mechanical proof exists that it rotates or moves through the cosmos. A future post will explain how immobility can be explained using physics. Obviously the Tychonic system also explains seasons and does so using standard maths and physics, even Relativity. I am also saying that Relativity explains nothing. Copernicanism is still best explained by Newton and Kepler's maths that he stole from Brahe (he probably killed him). The corruption of science is based on claims with no proofs. Nothing in history was built by 'science'. Theories must always follow facts. The issue with Relativity and a large part of QM is that it leads to a fantasy world devoid of common sense or logic.
Omg, I read this and liked it. The app did not register either. WTF, substack.
Sorry had a problem with the original post, so reposted.
I too asked about weight versus mass. I have known that something was wrong about black holes, wormholes, and even einstein. I never wanted to study his weird equations. How can my weight be related to light, to how fast light moved? There are so many basic observations that bring into question 'gravity' (mercury liquid keeps an anvil on its surface - relative density explains this - not bend in space time), as well as the dumb observer on a train word play.
--
I personally am on a quest for absolute fixed 'truths.' For me:
[1] The Creator is good, therefor any religious claims that some 'god' told them to kill others is bunk
[2] Man and woman are essential for each other, and yet there is a hierarchy and gender differences
[3] Be good to all created beings; other humans, mammals, reptiles, bugs, bacteria, water, trees, air
[4] When learning, only accept new information that is in line with the above (be good to all created beings, which include your neighbour AND yourself) [intentional confirmation bias]
Learning is to be good, and joyful, not tricky and self-centered (my group is best, and has special rights, others serve me ... even unto death). Learning is to be helpful - mathematics for its own 'glory' is trickery, math for quick aid to measure and build is useful and good. Let us stop worshiping math as an idol, let us bring back math to be a servant only.
[5]Let us look for trickery, where those spell castors ask us to believe without tests we can do ourselves. Where they say the 'proofs' are too far back in time, are too big for us to see, or too small, or require equipment vastly too expensive or exotic, where our own eyes prove their claim as false. Multi-genders, evolution, moving earth, virology, germs as contagious agents, interest and fractional reserve, chosen people and days and religions, murders disguised as righteousness, using any authority over our own tests which we need to do.
--
These all overlap and interweave. Einstein's frauds are in the same league as one group being better and more special than another, as well as choosing someone/some group to be our proxy instead of searching ourselves. Search for the root cause, not some gobblygook word salad with ample use of fear for heath issues.
medium.com/@enuminous EUREKA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Chat me up, PLEASE?????
What do you make of Wolfgang Smith?