Your sub stack is a great resource. I used your excellent article about the fake moon landings to debunk the lie to my 90 year old mother, she was laughing about how ludicrous the idea is, once you start to dig in a bit. I'm looking forward to sharing these recent ones on Darwin with other unsuspecting relatives. It's the well researched clarity of your arguments that's so useful to get the scales to fall from people's eyes.
Great thanks for the comment, much appreciated. I am glad you are sharing the information and that people are open to changing their minds. I too at one point believed in the moon landings, evolution and was indifferent to 'vaccines'. Needless to say I have flipped 180 degrees and with the zealotry of the converted I can honestly say I was wrong in so many areas of my previous life distorted as it was by secular world views. It is not easy having your world views exploded. Kudos to your mother. God bless her at age 90. A long life full of experience and she is right of course - 1960s tech could never take us through the Van Allen radiation belts on a 500K mile voyage there and back.
Good question. I am not clever enough to really know about the OOL. In my opinion only a creator of intelligence can make such perfection and design. I don't see how anyone can avoid that reality. For every creature flora or fauna, the entire design is all or nothing, eg - heart, blood, veins and arteries, or roots, trunk, branches, leaves. They all must 'arrive' at once. That is what the facts tell me personally. Darwinism cannot explain the arrival of species and transitions or links simply don't exist. Adaptation or oscillations within the existing code we have is not evolution. Adapting is a reaction (epi-genetic) to changing environments or circumstances. Chemical evolution or chemicals + electricity do not generate life, its code, design or complexity.
I so would love for intelligent design to be true. I would have a hard time trying to explain that, or even Darwinism. Don't laff, but what do you think is the shape of Earth?
Antony Flew the famous atheist after studying DNA came to the conclusion that a deity or creator intelligence must exist. I think the facts point ineluctably to intelligent creation. I can't see random variation producing anything. Re the shape of the Earth, from what I can see, it is an oblate slightly flattened sphere. Perfect size, shape, tilt and rotation for life with a 12 layered atmosphere - again a perfect design. I have tried to find mechanical proof the Earth's movement in space and its dirunal rotation but they are hard to come by.
Thank you for the great feedback. Have you calculated the maximum arc height on a straight line from the Nile‘s source at Lake Victoria to its mouth at the Med? On a radius of 6, 371 kms, its a whopping 401 kms approximately. However, Lake Victoria is only 1.13 kms in altitude.
I need to read up more on our origin story so thank you for your terrific writing.
Your sub stack is a great resource. I used your excellent article about the fake moon landings to debunk the lie to my 90 year old mother, she was laughing about how ludicrous the idea is, once you start to dig in a bit. I'm looking forward to sharing these recent ones on Darwin with other unsuspecting relatives. It's the well researched clarity of your arguments that's so useful to get the scales to fall from people's eyes.
Great thanks for the comment, much appreciated. I am glad you are sharing the information and that people are open to changing their minds. I too at one point believed in the moon landings, evolution and was indifferent to 'vaccines'. Needless to say I have flipped 180 degrees and with the zealotry of the converted I can honestly say I was wrong in so many areas of my previous life distorted as it was by secular world views. It is not easy having your world views exploded. Kudos to your mother. God bless her at age 90. A long life full of experience and she is right of course - 1960s tech could never take us through the Van Allen radiation belts on a 500K mile voyage there and back.
Great critique of Darwinism. What do you consider the most compelling explanation for the origins of life?
Good question. I am not clever enough to really know about the OOL. In my opinion only a creator of intelligence can make such perfection and design. I don't see how anyone can avoid that reality. For every creature flora or fauna, the entire design is all or nothing, eg - heart, blood, veins and arteries, or roots, trunk, branches, leaves. They all must 'arrive' at once. That is what the facts tell me personally. Darwinism cannot explain the arrival of species and transitions or links simply don't exist. Adaptation or oscillations within the existing code we have is not evolution. Adapting is a reaction (epi-genetic) to changing environments or circumstances. Chemical evolution or chemicals + electricity do not generate life, its code, design or complexity.
I so would love for intelligent design to be true. I would have a hard time trying to explain that, or even Darwinism. Don't laff, but what do you think is the shape of Earth?
Antony Flew the famous atheist after studying DNA came to the conclusion that a deity or creator intelligence must exist. I think the facts point ineluctably to intelligent creation. I can't see random variation producing anything. Re the shape of the Earth, from what I can see, it is an oblate slightly flattened sphere. Perfect size, shape, tilt and rotation for life with a 12 layered atmosphere - again a perfect design. I have tried to find mechanical proof the Earth's movement in space and its dirunal rotation but they are hard to come by.
Thank you for the great feedback. Have you calculated the maximum arc height on a straight line from the Nile‘s source at Lake Victoria to its mouth at the Med? On a radius of 6, 371 kms, its a whopping 401 kms approximately. However, Lake Victoria is only 1.13 kms in altitude.
I need to read up more on our origin story so thank you for your terrific writing.
How‘s your math?