This is a well-written article. One question that occurred to me is how can one explain geostationary satellites in a geocentric model? We can see with our eyes the fixed images these satellites produce of the Earth. If the Earth is at rest then we would have to conclude that the geostationary satellites are at rest as well. That seems non-sensical to me.
Thanks this is a good question. Some Geocentrists do support a rotating Earth though the planet is immobile, not moving around the Sun. For those that don't GPS satellites are an example of the entrained aether which is in motion and carries the satellite with it. This is partially explained here https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/scientism-and-special-theory-of-relativity but I need to have a separate and simplified post on this (thanks for the idea). So they will move - the debate is how (entrained aether is rejected by the Standard Model).
Brilliant. Thanks. Suffering slightly from input overload here with all the great stuff you have recently posted. You mention "standard text book proofs of heliocentricity'' but before reading you guys I had never seen any defense just assumptions presented as fact. How on earth do you know all this stuff? I used to believe the cosmic distance scale safe out to parallax distances - not any longer. Since covid 19 the Church of Science is crumbling.
Thanks David. Material is accumulated from studying the philosophy of physics and science. Einsteinian maths are based on philosophy (Copernicanism) not experimentation. Similar problem with Galileo. The evidence clearly states that both were wrong. Even if people don't agree with that, they cannot deny that Earth mobility and rotation are still unsupported - 500 yrs after Copernicus - with self-evidentiary mechancial proofs. Quite remarkable. We don't know that much about our planet or the universe. Yet 'The Science' was a church claims omnipotent powers of insight and divination. The credulity of the masses (thanks to State education, propaganda etc) is rather depressing and also incredible to behold (in age where everyone is a firm believer in 'science'....).
This is a well-written article. One question that occurred to me is how can one explain geostationary satellites in a geocentric model? We can see with our eyes the fixed images these satellites produce of the Earth. If the Earth is at rest then we would have to conclude that the geostationary satellites are at rest as well. That seems non-sensical to me.
Thanks this is a good question. Some Geocentrists do support a rotating Earth though the planet is immobile, not moving around the Sun. For those that don't GPS satellites are an example of the entrained aether which is in motion and carries the satellite with it. This is partially explained here https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/scientism-and-special-theory-of-relativity but I need to have a separate and simplified post on this (thanks for the idea). So they will move - the debate is how (entrained aether is rejected by the Standard Model).
Brilliant. Thanks. Suffering slightly from input overload here with all the great stuff you have recently posted. You mention "standard text book proofs of heliocentricity'' but before reading you guys I had never seen any defense just assumptions presented as fact. How on earth do you know all this stuff? I used to believe the cosmic distance scale safe out to parallax distances - not any longer. Since covid 19 the Church of Science is crumbling.
Thanks David. Material is accumulated from studying the philosophy of physics and science. Einsteinian maths are based on philosophy (Copernicanism) not experimentation. Similar problem with Galileo. The evidence clearly states that both were wrong. Even if people don't agree with that, they cannot deny that Earth mobility and rotation are still unsupported - 500 yrs after Copernicus - with self-evidentiary mechancial proofs. Quite remarkable. We don't know that much about our planet or the universe. Yet 'The Science' was a church claims omnipotent powers of insight and divination. The credulity of the masses (thanks to State education, propaganda etc) is rather depressing and also incredible to behold (in age where everyone is a firm believer in 'science'....).