Yes we live in a world of narratives which are unsupported by evidence. But as always, any data that destroys the narrative, proves the narrative! 'Our models predicted this and our maths prove that the disproof of our theory is just a further proof of our framework.' etc etc. Example: If you died after being stabbed with the Corona quackcines, it actually saved you from a far worse fate.
Cheers, thanks for the comments. I know Phd's in Physics, actively working on particle accelerators, teaching, researching etc - who believe everything they were taught, and don't apply the slightest critical thinking to their work, models or maths. None of them have or had heard of Sagnac for example, or Dayton Miller.
In reality, if they did dissent they would not be funded. Many have signed contracts with military agencies who in effect own the 'research'. The public has no idea how controlled and corrupt 'the science' really is.
Personally I am starting to understand how science, medicine and a host of other fields are becoming increasingly corrupted and have been for a long time.
Thanks again for your reply and your willingness to help us all understand these realities that we face.
The more one studies about things one thinks they know about the more they realize they don’t know anything at all ???
Yes we live in a world of narratives which are unsupported by evidence. But as always, any data that destroys the narrative, proves the narrative! 'Our models predicted this and our maths prove that the disproof of our theory is just a further proof of our framework.' etc etc. Example: If you died after being stabbed with the Corona quackcines, it actually saved you from a far worse fate.
Thanks for the reply and further explanation of the subject line.
Great stuff !!!
I can only imagine how united people would be if they all actually knew the whole truth.
For a multitude of reasons I don’t think that will ever happen !!!
Cheers, thanks for the comments. I know Phd's in Physics, actively working on particle accelerators, teaching, researching etc - who believe everything they were taught, and don't apply the slightest critical thinking to their work, models or maths. None of them have or had heard of Sagnac for example, or Dayton Miller.
In reality, if they did dissent they would not be funded. Many have signed contracts with military agencies who in effect own the 'research'. The public has no idea how controlled and corrupt 'the science' really is.
Personally I am starting to understand how science, medicine and a host of other fields are becoming increasingly corrupted and have been for a long time.
Thanks again for your reply and your willingness to help us all understand these realities that we face.