Thanks Michael. Fully agree with you. Quantum Mechanics discusses much the same phenomena. Clocks don't 'go slower' though the rate of clocking might well change as you say (gravity, air pressure, a solar flare, gamma rays, heat in the equipment etc etc)
True. Thanks - the Hafele–Keating experiment of October 1971-- four cesium-beam atomic clocks aboard commercial airliners which flew twice around the world, first eastward, then westward, and compared the clocks against those of the United States Naval Observatory. Many explanations exist for the time dilation. Relativity was never proven.
Yes. In clown world, beauty will be declared ugly. Working with AI, it is true that no one knows where or what the underlying data sources for the models are. Large Language models are removed even from those building AI engines. In other words they can be manipulated to give any answer deemed 'acceptable'.
For me AI is dangerous. Machines that lie? Not good. We have had a hard enough time of it dealing with other humans and the natural world these last 3 thousand years or so. Why would any of us wish to waste our time arguing with an electronic brick wall or, even more stupidly, believing anything it might "say"?
Outstanding Article!
My simplest definition so far......
The quantization rate of the observer.
Time.
Humans, animals, computers would percieve rates of change differently.
The beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Although percived changes involve more than the five senses..
Heatbeat.
Biofield response/ strength (emf shield and sensory field)
Hair sensory
barometric pressure
etc
Cheers,
Michael.
Thanks Michael. Fully agree with you. Quantum Mechanics discusses much the same phenomena. Clocks don't 'go slower' though the rate of clocking might well change as you say (gravity, air pressure, a solar flare, gamma rays, heat in the equipment etc etc)
The Hafele-Keating experiment was carried out on commercial airliners, not navy jets.
True. Thanks - the Hafele–Keating experiment of October 1971-- four cesium-beam atomic clocks aboard commercial airliners which flew twice around the world, first eastward, then westward, and compared the clocks against those of the United States Naval Observatory. Many explanations exist for the time dilation. Relativity was never proven.
Excellent, thanks. What would a machine know about truth? Next machines will be reducing beauty to numbers.
Yes. In clown world, beauty will be declared ugly. Working with AI, it is true that no one knows where or what the underlying data sources for the models are. Large Language models are removed even from those building AI engines. In other words they can be manipulated to give any answer deemed 'acceptable'.
For me AI is dangerous. Machines that lie? Not good. We have had a hard enough time of it dealing with other humans and the natural world these last 3 thousand years or so. Why would any of us wish to waste our time arguing with an electronic brick wall or, even more stupidly, believing anything it might "say"?
Yes AI is frustrating. It really does spew back the narrative. Few if any alternative viewpoints are offered.