Are you ready Neo to go down into another rabbit hole? Or afraid of being labelled 'anti-science'? Is the Earth actually quite young? Using the Darwinian religion's own dating technique says so.
I unsubscribed awhile back as there are times the amount of sneering in the tone of the articles is too much for me. But an impression was made because this substack came to mind as I was reading a book talking about evolution rolling out assumed ages of things like it was a given and I remembered that at least one person didn't think carbon dating was what they say it is. Chat GPT says the age of the Earth has been confirmed by many other techniques though. I'll have to have it walk through them with me. I like to think the historical figures of science weren't the chumps or frauds this substack makes them out to be and the real story is science is hard. I will maintain that for as long as I can.
I unsubscribed awhile back as there are times the amount of sneering in the tone of the articles is too much for me. But an impression was made because this substack came to mind as I was reading a book talking about evolution rolling out assumed ages of things like it was a given and I remembered that at least one person didn't think carbon dating was what they say it is. Chat GPT says the age of the Earth has been confirmed by many other techniques though. I'll have to have it walk through them with me. I like to think the historical figures of science weren't the chumps or frauds this substack makes them out to be and the real story is science is hard. I will maintain that for as long as I can.