You must abandon the relativistic term "spacetime" and instead distinguish "Space" and "Time" as separate, mutually imbricated manifolds engaged in a dance of simultaneity. It's a really nice article.
Thanks glad you liked it. Yes space and time are totally separate concepts and can never be merged, you are right (manifolds is a good depiction as well).
Its ironic since Einsteins Relativity was the source of quantum physics.
Abandoning the aether gave rise to the idea of disembodied waves and so the wave-particle duality of photons was born. Leading us inexorably towards insanity.
If we accept that Einstein was a fraud and that his theories are metaphysical nonsense, then quantum physics disappears too.
Everything is resolved, aether physics can begin and perhaps we can develop space propulsion.
I assume this poison pill was introduced to slow down development because rapid scientific progress destabilised the control of religious institutions.
QM is opposed to Relativity. Einstotle was trying to explain large phenomena and 'fix' Newton. The QM practictioners using experimentation disproved Relativity by discovering quanta and how the micro might work. The 1927 Solvay Conference post outlines some of their complaints against Relativity. QM disproves Relativity and Einstein knew this.
However he underestimated the power of the trick that got his relativity gibberish accepted in the first place: The Emperors new clothes effect.
If you tell people that if they don't agree with your explanation, it's because they don't understand it, stupid prideful people will feel embarrassed and pretend to understand.
This works wonders on many scientists because it enables them to feel a smug satisfaction in their beliefs, instead of alarm, when people point out the logical problems.
So, while I agree on the surface that QM opposes Relativity. I would say it was cut from the same cloth and is more of a patch over the first wave of problems.
It's like if I claimed santa claus delivers all his presents in one night using time dilation.
And then a new generation of believers realise that Santa wouldn't be visible if he was moving that quickly, so how would anyone know he exists?
A Quantum Santa that is both slow and fast is the contradictory bullshit that must be believed to avoid the recognition that I am a fraud and Santa isn't real.
Good points. There is a lot wrong with QM which led to the craziness of 'string theory' and their 10+ dimensions. QM is probably just scratching the surface of real particle-micro complexity. Relativity has nothing to say about such matters and the Einstotle was bitterly opposed to Heisenberg, Bohr et al. He never bothered to understood why QM had/has experimental and real world success, even within its limitations. QM offers absolutes - anathema to the Einstein cult.
100% spot on. The degrees, the money, fame and awards which dominate 'the science' want nothing to do with new paradigms or avenues of inquiry of course.
There were 5 likes already registered when I got to the end of the article. I hit like. The like count went to 6, for a heartbeat, then fell right back to 5.
You must abandon the relativistic term "spacetime" and instead distinguish "Space" and "Time" as separate, mutually imbricated manifolds engaged in a dance of simultaneity. It's a really nice article.
Thanks glad you liked it. Yes space and time are totally separate concepts and can never be merged, you are right (manifolds is a good depiction as well).
Its ironic since Einsteins Relativity was the source of quantum physics.
Abandoning the aether gave rise to the idea of disembodied waves and so the wave-particle duality of photons was born. Leading us inexorably towards insanity.
If we accept that Einstein was a fraud and that his theories are metaphysical nonsense, then quantum physics disappears too.
Everything is resolved, aether physics can begin and perhaps we can develop space propulsion.
I assume this poison pill was introduced to slow down development because rapid scientific progress destabilised the control of religious institutions.
QM is opposed to Relativity. Einstotle was trying to explain large phenomena and 'fix' Newton. The QM practictioners using experimentation disproved Relativity by discovering quanta and how the micro might work. The 1927 Solvay Conference post outlines some of their complaints against Relativity. QM disproves Relativity and Einstein knew this.
Indeed, it's why he was so opposed to it.
However he underestimated the power of the trick that got his relativity gibberish accepted in the first place: The Emperors new clothes effect.
If you tell people that if they don't agree with your explanation, it's because they don't understand it, stupid prideful people will feel embarrassed and pretend to understand.
This works wonders on many scientists because it enables them to feel a smug satisfaction in their beliefs, instead of alarm, when people point out the logical problems.
So, while I agree on the surface that QM opposes Relativity. I would say it was cut from the same cloth and is more of a patch over the first wave of problems.
It's like if I claimed santa claus delivers all his presents in one night using time dilation.
And then a new generation of believers realise that Santa wouldn't be visible if he was moving that quickly, so how would anyone know he exists?
A Quantum Santa that is both slow and fast is the contradictory bullshit that must be believed to avoid the recognition that I am a fraud and Santa isn't real.
Good points. There is a lot wrong with QM which led to the craziness of 'string theory' and their 10+ dimensions. QM is probably just scratching the surface of real particle-micro complexity. Relativity has nothing to say about such matters and the Einstotle was bitterly opposed to Heisenberg, Bohr et al. He never bothered to understood why QM had/has experimental and real world success, even within its limitations. QM offers absolutes - anathema to the Einstein cult.
In a percieved observable phenonemon existence, there is no nothing.
EVERYTHING has an observable phenonemon.
"That about wraps it up for Einstein."
"it's spoon fed science, without the spoon" 😂
Cheers
Michael.
Yes, Relativity is a non physical 'theory'. It is truly bizarre that something which is not mechanical is called 'physics'. :)
The time has come for a new theory of gravity, and a new model of the non-expanding universe.
100% spot on. The degrees, the money, fame and awards which dominate 'the science' want nothing to do with new paradigms or avenues of inquiry of course.
There were 5 likes already registered when I got to the end of the article. I hit like. The like count went to 6, for a heartbeat, then fell right back to 5.
Perhaps Substack could look into this?
It's a known bug. Your like is actually there.