Relativity is dead. It’s been dead for a long time - just another system of control embedded by what most call the deep state or one may say it’s the banks , basically the same thing. However it’s quite disturbing when one really deconstructs it , sees it for what it is + lack of progress that this has caused - digging shit up from the ground and burning it for energy for 170 years is not advanced it’s devolved ,primitive - it’s being allowed to continue in order to keep world control -advance false energy scarcity, and brainwash the population into believing that energy freedom is not possible.
Yes there is more productivity and utility in digging up and burning Peat to be honest :) Relativity is the control plane of maths for the Big Bang. The Bangers can't afford to let go of it, for the same reasons that Vaxx fanatics can't admit that the poisons caused death, myocarditis, neurological issues, blood disease and did nothing to stop a non-existent enemy.
Space is NOT curved , look at a time accelerated video in one of our galactic arms, when stars collide with each other they repel each other, as each star has its own electromagnetic frequency. If space was curved the larger object or star would combine with a smaller one as it falls into the gravity well of the larger star. This never happens as the electromagnetic gravitational frequency of each star is different- curved Space time is a made up math insanity, pushed by somebody who lived in a dreamworld of made up fake math. Pushed on society by the powers that be.
Spot on. If space was curved the universe could not exist, there would be no medium to transport light for example. It would also imply that our own existence was inside of a specific 'grid', meaning that we live in our own time-space dimension, separate from absolute reality.
Thanks David, glad it helps. If 'the science' left the BB as a 'theory', it would not be so offensive, but they advertise in schools and in the media as 'proven fact', which it is not.
I agree with you. I wrote the same in my master's thesis 33 years ago with respect to a different "science" altogether. There is an endless temptation, on the part of those seeking benefits, to nudge theory in the direction of fact. I suppose at this stage, as we all cast about trying to comprehend what just happened, that it was, ultimately, caused by this as well. Perhaps we are trying to describe a universal paradox of human knowledge. Does truth exist outside our perception of it? Is the truth a function of the number of people who believe it? Well, whatever the answer to that may be, I certainly think the BB theory is not a very good one given observational evidence that contradicts it.
Good for you to do the Master's in this area. That would be a tough masters to get.
Probably need to 'confirm' the bias of the model to get the degree. Interesting comment on truth. Scholastics including St Thomas Aquinas, believed that a product's price was mostly subjective, or the price that people in general, in an area and given time, were willing to price (subjective utility, not objective ie a pearl is worth more than a horse, though it is for decoration only). Maybe in a post-truth world, the same applies to truth and reality as you mention 'what is truth'? If the speed of light is utterly wrong, will 'science' change its equations or just take vote on the speed and the majority wins? Or if redshift in reality is the opposite expression of the theory, will the maths be altered? Is evidence even necessary anymore or just flowery AI inspired monographs and arcane maths? The Stabs, Evolution and other areas for over 200 years have never confirmed observations and reality.
Relativity is dead. It’s been dead for a long time - just another system of control embedded by what most call the deep state or one may say it’s the banks , basically the same thing. However it’s quite disturbing when one really deconstructs it , sees it for what it is + lack of progress that this has caused - digging shit up from the ground and burning it for energy for 170 years is not advanced it’s devolved ,primitive - it’s being allowed to continue in order to keep world control -advance false energy scarcity, and brainwash the population into believing that energy freedom is not possible.
Yes there is more productivity and utility in digging up and burning Peat to be honest :) Relativity is the control plane of maths for the Big Bang. The Bangers can't afford to let go of it, for the same reasons that Vaxx fanatics can't admit that the poisons caused death, myocarditis, neurological issues, blood disease and did nothing to stop a non-existent enemy.
Space is NOT curved , look at a time accelerated video in one of our galactic arms, when stars collide with each other they repel each other, as each star has its own electromagnetic frequency. If space was curved the larger object or star would combine with a smaller one as it falls into the gravity well of the larger star. This never happens as the electromagnetic gravitational frequency of each star is different- curved Space time is a made up math insanity, pushed by somebody who lived in a dreamworld of made up fake math. Pushed on society by the powers that be.
Spot on. If space was curved the universe could not exist, there would be no medium to transport light for example. It would also imply that our own existence was inside of a specific 'grid', meaning that we live in our own time-space dimension, separate from absolute reality.
Excellent. Sent to friends.
Thanks David, glad it helps. If 'the science' left the BB as a 'theory', it would not be so offensive, but they advertise in schools and in the media as 'proven fact', which it is not.
I agree with you. I wrote the same in my master's thesis 33 years ago with respect to a different "science" altogether. There is an endless temptation, on the part of those seeking benefits, to nudge theory in the direction of fact. I suppose at this stage, as we all cast about trying to comprehend what just happened, that it was, ultimately, caused by this as well. Perhaps we are trying to describe a universal paradox of human knowledge. Does truth exist outside our perception of it? Is the truth a function of the number of people who believe it? Well, whatever the answer to that may be, I certainly think the BB theory is not a very good one given observational evidence that contradicts it.
Good for you to do the Master's in this area. That would be a tough masters to get.
Probably need to 'confirm' the bias of the model to get the degree. Interesting comment on truth. Scholastics including St Thomas Aquinas, believed that a product's price was mostly subjective, or the price that people in general, in an area and given time, were willing to price (subjective utility, not objective ie a pearl is worth more than a horse, though it is for decoration only). Maybe in a post-truth world, the same applies to truth and reality as you mention 'what is truth'? If the speed of light is utterly wrong, will 'science' change its equations or just take vote on the speed and the majority wins? Or if redshift in reality is the opposite expression of the theory, will the maths be altered? Is evidence even necessary anymore or just flowery AI inspired monographs and arcane maths? The Stabs, Evolution and other areas for over 200 years have never confirmed observations and reality.