The fraud of 1919 and 'bending Starlight which proved Relativity'. The cult commits data fraud to confirm its philosophy.
The Relativity cult supposedly performs an experiment, which (shock news), confirms that the Relativity cult is right! Never saw that coming. Follow that Science.
Einstein: “I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i.e., continuous structures. In that case, nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics.”
Lincoln Barnett, The Universe and Dr. Einstein, revised edition, 1950, p. 10
Einstein and his gravitational ‘theorem’ do not explain anything. For Relativists, gravity is a wave oscillation found within the non-existent (unproven) ‘continous field’ of a merged space-time curvature. This theory has never explained why you are glued to your chair and not floating off somewhere.
Pace ‘The Science’, there are 3 ‘claims’ which ‘prove’ Relativity.
1. Bending of starlight around the Sun (absurd, this was known to medieval natural philosophers). See below.
2. Connected to #1, ‘gravitational redshifts’, sometimes called ‘gravitational lensing’. Redshifts are discussed on this substack, given they actually disprove Relativity. There is no factual evidence that a ‘redshift’ means a recessionary movement nor long ages.
3. Mercury’s perihelion (easily explained by both Newtonian maths (Gerber 1887) and the cosmic aether.
Let’s focus on #1 – the ‘bending of starlight’.
The Gospel
One of the great canonical lies which ‘supports’ Relativity is the ‘bending’ of starlight due to the Sun’s gravity. Saying this supports Relativity is as inane as saying the movement of the hummingbird’s wings proves that space and time are merged. Starlight bent by the aether and gravity do not ‘confirm Relativity’. Let’s explore the claim.
· The phenomena: Starlight bends close to the Sun as it passes to the Earth (thanks guys, observationally known since about 1610).
· The claim: This can only be explained by Einstein’s cult. Einstein ‘predicted’ such a bending in his 1916 General Theory published in Annalen der Physik.
· The reality: Bending starlight was surmised and discussed in the Paris school of physics in the 14th century (Buridan, Oresme). With the advent of telescopes in the 17th century, this was a common observation. Bradley in 1725 tried to measure the aberration of light. He was one of many in the 17th and 18th centuries.
The Reality: No one has ever disputed the bending of starlight. Light aberration is not the issue. It is the theoretical interpretation of why it bends which is at issue.
· Experiment: In order to assess the bending of starlight, an astronomical ‘observation’ was setup in 1919 off the coast of Africa (Principe Island) and the coast of Brazil at the same time, during a total eclipse.
· Who: In the Principe experiment, the 2 astrophysicists who experimentally ‘showed’ that the bending of starlight around the Sun was ‘proven’ by Relativity, were 2 Relativity disciples, namely Eddington, one of the world’s leading physicists and one of Einstein’s chief marketers, along with his deacon Cottingham.
· Conflict of Interest?: Accepting Relativity’s own claims of an infallible proof is as naive as following ‘The Science’ of pharma and injecting yourself with unknown and unpronounceable poisons against a fictitious ‘bat virus’. Use your common sense - why should we blindly accept the claims from the Relativity cult itself?
Reality: In fact the ‘proof’ from one of the high priests of Relativity, Eddington, and his ‘evidence’ that starlight is bent due to ‘Relativity’, is of course a fraud.
This is what we would expect with ‘The Science’. Loud proclamations of truth and insights, based on data fraud and cherry-picked, massaged statistics and corrupted photos. Nothing has changed since 1919. See below.
Data Fraud (shocking surprise)
During the 1919 total eclipse Eddington and Cottingham, from Team Relativity, took photos of light aberration. They drew pictures based on these photos which were 600 times the actual value and size of the supposed ‘starlight’ distortion near to the eclipsed Sun. These exaggerated and frankly ridiculous images were issued to the ‘media’ who, in imitation of the messenger slaves they were during the Corona plandemic, printed and shared them around the world.
The images are entirely false and give the impression of a massive bending of light. In actual fact, the light bend is so small it is barely noticeable even with the most powerful telescopes. We are talking miniscules of fractions of infinitesimally small amounts.
The displacement of starlight as proposed by Einstein, and documented by his followers Eddington and Cottingham, was equal to an angle of 1.75 arc seconds. Newton’s calculations were about half of Einstein’s ‘prediction’.
An angle of 1.75 arc seconds in space, is about 5/10.000ths of 1 angular degree (0.0004861). This is equivalent to a subtended (delimited, enclosed) angle of a human hair at 2 km distance.
It is meaningless. This means that Newtonian calculations which could easily be amended were ‘off’ by 2/10000 of a fraction. Please. Yet look at the images that were printed in the Fake News:
Worse, there is evidence of data fraud.
Campbell and Trumper (1923) replicated this experiment and found the displacement of stars during the 1922 eclipse to be very chaotic and all over the place. Their data is more aligned with a turbulent cosmic aether rather than a smoothed out gravitational 4th dimensions field which does not exist (Demeo, p. 208, 2019).
Campbell and Trumper’s observations would be supported by Miller’s 300.000 experiments (1921-1933), which found both a cosmic aether wind and drift of between 5 km and 11 km per second (NASA, Harvard). This rate of drift is significant, and by comparison is roughly 500 hundred thousand times more relevant than the next to zero ‘error’ correction purportedly calculated by Eddington. Yet ‘The Science’ ignores the 300.000 observations from Miller and accepts Eddington’s few observations?
Further, physicists Collins and Pinch (2012) went back to the original Eddington-Cottingham data and found that they cherry picked and ignored data that contravened Einstein’s ‘prediction’. Eddington chose only those photos from the 1919 eclipse which supported Einstein’s maths, rejecting evidence which contravened the ‘prediction’. He also made large assumptions which were never disclosed in calculating the angle of starlight bending. This is called data fraud.
The SOHO (solar and heliospheric) data finds no evidence to support Relativity’s claims around light aberration or displacement. The measurements of light aberration are not smooth, common, or within a pattern as predicted by the General Theory of Relativity and its ‘4th dimension’ of curved space which is a fiction. They are all over the place as would be expected with a cosmic aether that might be active. Given there is aether-denialism in physics, the data is rarely pursued to where it will lead.
None of the above is surprising. The only surprise would be that anyone is shocked that the Relativity cult performed experiments which (amazingly!) confirmed their own theory and did so using fraud and deceit, promoted by a witless and compliant ‘media’ and an educational system that serves up dogma.
Bottom Line
Saying that a planet moves in a certain way, and this movement is explained by ‘Relativity’s maths’ does not mean that either the maths or the theory is correct, especially given that any number of other maths and theories can explain or ‘save the same phenomena’. An example is Mar’s perihelion.
Abstract equations which generate infinitesimally small fractional values also prove nothing when no physical evidence can be offered. An example as outlined in this post is light aberration. There are probably as many models to explain this phenomena as there are physicists.
Stating that light is bent by gravity or a cosmic phenomenon like an aether, was not new in 1916, not in 1816, not in 1716, not even in 1616. Because the cat jumped it does not prove that Relativity is real. Because the moon wobbles in its orbit does not prove that Relativity is real. Because Eddington and the Relativity cult committed an intentional fraud to ‘confirm’ their cult does not prove that Relativity is real.
All hail.
==
NASA, Harvard University, Discussion of Campbell and Trumper’s data, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1923PASP...35..158C/abstract
Harry Collins, Trevor Pinch, ‘The Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science’ 1994, 2012. (Both Collins and Pinch still believe in Relativity…..)
James Demeo, The Dynamic Aether of Cosmic Space, 2019 (pp 208-211)
Cervantes-Cota et al, ‘The Legacy of Einstein's Eclipse, Gravitational Lensing’. 2019, 10.48550/arXiv.1912.07674, to get published you will have to emit a panegyric and ignore the data fraud and other possible explanatory models.
The thesis refuting Relativity holds up given all the arguments. But be very careful applying the term “There is no evidence of such and such.” The paid coverup experts, particularly in the health sciences, have co-opted these words to hide their deliberate failure to test their products and methods , and to routinely fool the public into thinking they have proven a negative.
Aether science is essentially proof of the ancient and now occult pagan worldview. Thanks for sharing. I wonder if anyone is doing any aether research now?