not one single positive mutation can be found --------- Wow !! it sounds like you just gave the Darwin followers//WORSHIPERS // devotees etc. a solid knock out punch of reality
There are various databases which exist of 'mutations'. None can list a positive 'mutation'. In Darwin's fantasy world 'mutations' were magical things, and of no great complexity or even importance. They just 'happened' and the god-selector Nature would judge which ones were good and which ones were not. Darwin could be forgiven his gross ignorance. Not so with the modern neoDarwinians drowning in microbiological information and detail. All of them know damn well that the genetic coding for a thumb cannot appear out of nowhere. Yet there they are, wallowing in endless grant money and the need to publish what the gatekeepers want.
not one single positive mutation can be found --------- Wow !! it sounds like you just gave the Darwin followers//WORSHIPERS // devotees etc. a solid knock out punch of reality
There are various databases which exist of 'mutations'. None can list a positive 'mutation'. In Darwin's fantasy world 'mutations' were magical things, and of no great complexity or even importance. They just 'happened' and the god-selector Nature would judge which ones were good and which ones were not. Darwin could be forgiven his gross ignorance. Not so with the modern neoDarwinians drowning in microbiological information and detail. All of them know damn well that the genetic coding for a thumb cannot appear out of nowhere. Yet there they are, wallowing in endless grant money and the need to publish what the gatekeepers want.