Thanks David. Yes so many questions, yet 'the science' has so few answers. Copernicus' plagiarism of the ancient Greeks and their constellation observations was still accurate after 2000 years and still holds after 3000 years from the original. How is that possible unless all constellations are moving in perfect synchronicity and how is that possible given 'relative motion'? Cosmology is a philosophy.
Agreed. I always suspected most of science was bunkum but until I read your stuff I had no idea how deep the rabbit hole goes. Can we even point to a single "scientific truth" that is not speculation or simply math? Let me know if you want me to adapt your stuff for You Tube presentations. I suspect you might be in a university and have to be careful, but I am free as a bird and have Star Link on our boat so they cannot shut me down ( I hope). This info needs to reach a far wider audience. It has been my academic life for 40 years but I never got anything like as far as you have. Could you have a look at parralax to nearby stars and planets please? I assumed that this proved the earths orbit of the sun and distance to nearby stars. Since reading your stuff I am not so sure.
Thanks - yes youtube or rumble would be good. Let me think about how that could be done. Re Parallax - the effect is either non-existent or so miniscule it does not prove motion. In many cases it confirms no motion (which may be right or wrong). I will tidy up prevoius posts to explain this, since as you said, it is used as a 'proof' along with pendulums, yet neither proves anything.
Thanks. Do we even really know the distance to the closest star? If we are not going around the sun and parallax is another made up thing then how can we know for sure? Please also include solar system distances, are even they accurate? How do we really know the distance to the sun and planets? My feeling is that the cosmic distance scale is all just speculation. You Tube channel could concentrate on a popular scientific idea considered to be a proven fact - earth's movement for example - and tell in jargon free language the other side of the story. Then invite the audience to decide if we are dealing with fact or speculation. Really just a simplified version of what you have been doing here. Format could be first the current orthodoxy, second the other side, third the implications, fourth and invitation to consider if we are dealing with fact or theory. For me, science is great stuff as long as it does not get above itself and start thinking it is more than just a more or less useful theory. An example of useful accurate science is clock making, navigation, map making. We use these on our boat. The dangers come when science thinks it is truth. Then we get mandated and coerced with experimental drugs for our own good. Site could be called something like Scientific Heretic or Is Science Fact or Theory?
Very well done but above my intellect. Dr Jerry Tennant goes into Maxwell's and Einstein's equations and how they are incomplete and wrong in his book Healing is Voltage - Scalar Energy. He also proposes how protons do not exist and at the center are black holes.
Thanks for the note - will definitely go through Dr Tennant's book. Will post a simple summary of the tautology in Einstein's maths which negate Relativity and also 'Bell's Law' which disproves the space-time dimension. Can add what Dr. Tennant offers as well. Re black holes, time would supposedly stop completely at their edge (Hawking) but imagine if cosmic creation was a 'white hole' event, this would mean that star time (billions of light years supposedly) would be thousands in Earth time (time massively speeds up in a white hole). This is one of the few insights from Einstotle - that cosmic time is very different than Earth time.
Another excellent post. We know nothing.
Thanks David. Yes so many questions, yet 'the science' has so few answers. Copernicus' plagiarism of the ancient Greeks and their constellation observations was still accurate after 2000 years and still holds after 3000 years from the original. How is that possible unless all constellations are moving in perfect synchronicity and how is that possible given 'relative motion'? Cosmology is a philosophy.
Agreed. I always suspected most of science was bunkum but until I read your stuff I had no idea how deep the rabbit hole goes. Can we even point to a single "scientific truth" that is not speculation or simply math? Let me know if you want me to adapt your stuff for You Tube presentations. I suspect you might be in a university and have to be careful, but I am free as a bird and have Star Link on our boat so they cannot shut me down ( I hope). This info needs to reach a far wider audience. It has been my academic life for 40 years but I never got anything like as far as you have. Could you have a look at parralax to nearby stars and planets please? I assumed that this proved the earths orbit of the sun and distance to nearby stars. Since reading your stuff I am not so sure.
Thanks - yes youtube or rumble would be good. Let me think about how that could be done. Re Parallax - the effect is either non-existent or so miniscule it does not prove motion. In many cases it confirms no motion (which may be right or wrong). I will tidy up prevoius posts to explain this, since as you said, it is used as a 'proof' along with pendulums, yet neither proves anything.
Thanks. Do we even really know the distance to the closest star? If we are not going around the sun and parallax is another made up thing then how can we know for sure? Please also include solar system distances, are even they accurate? How do we really know the distance to the sun and planets? My feeling is that the cosmic distance scale is all just speculation. You Tube channel could concentrate on a popular scientific idea considered to be a proven fact - earth's movement for example - and tell in jargon free language the other side of the story. Then invite the audience to decide if we are dealing with fact or speculation. Really just a simplified version of what you have been doing here. Format could be first the current orthodoxy, second the other side, third the implications, fourth and invitation to consider if we are dealing with fact or theory. For me, science is great stuff as long as it does not get above itself and start thinking it is more than just a more or less useful theory. An example of useful accurate science is clock making, navigation, map making. We use these on our boat. The dangers come when science thinks it is truth. Then we get mandated and coerced with experimental drugs for our own good. Site could be called something like Scientific Heretic or Is Science Fact or Theory?
Very well done but above my intellect. Dr Jerry Tennant goes into Maxwell's and Einstein's equations and how they are incomplete and wrong in his book Healing is Voltage - Scalar Energy. He also proposes how protons do not exist and at the center are black holes.
Thanks for the note - will definitely go through Dr Tennant's book. Will post a simple summary of the tautology in Einstein's maths which negate Relativity and also 'Bell's Law' which disproves the space-time dimension. Can add what Dr. Tennant offers as well. Re black holes, time would supposedly stop completely at their edge (Hawking) but imagine if cosmic creation was a 'white hole' event, this would mean that star time (billions of light years supposedly) would be thousands in Earth time (time massively speeds up in a white hole). This is one of the few insights from Einstotle - that cosmic time is very different than Earth time.