Thanks David. People should understand the difference between a philosophy (Darwinism) and real science (micro biology). The real science of nature does not support a single claim of Evolution. Chance creating 69 billion miles of DNA in a human is simply mathematically and organically, impossible.
Aug 21·edited Aug 21Liked by Dr Ferdinand Santos III
Indeed. Having the "consensus" believe, proclaim, and act on, impossibility, assumption, pure craziness, seems to be the main purpose of the Infallible Church of Science. One thing we can say in defense of religious theology is that its metaphysical beliefs were not materialistic or really mechanical in anyway and that left the debate about our actions mostly in the ethical or political realm. Much better. Science has reduced reality to a machine and made ethics irrelevant. Bad. In respect of this, one term from modern medicine that makes my blood boil is " mechanism of action". I feel like yelling that I am not a bloody machine. One other thing re your comment here it seems that I may even more of a science skeptic than you as I certainly do not think micro biology is real at all. Just as I see no evidence that the earth moves or is billions of years old or is made from atoms - as you mention - and so on, I see no good evidence that infectious disease has a single external environmental cause or that one outside "thing" causes another inside "thing" inside a living organism.
Totally agree with you on disease. I used to stupidly believe in 'germs' until researching the chain of events which would pass a viral genomic structure between creatures and species. No evidence supports this nor modern medicine's theology on mechanistic processes causing a disease. Endless time cannot create a single cell through naturalism, nor a single bacteria which when toxified from our poisoned tissues could indeed spread disease.
Agreed. I dream of going back to the world before science. Much better. Much more human. Much cleaner. And to top it all, the educated actually read books, many of which were actually good. What we have now is an intellectual dark age of utter confusion before the robot take over, followed, no doubt, by the cull. Bad.
Excellent, as usual, thanks. Great book list. Seems to me the covid madness has really begun to get people questioning science. Good.
Thanks David. People should understand the difference between a philosophy (Darwinism) and real science (micro biology). The real science of nature does not support a single claim of Evolution. Chance creating 69 billion miles of DNA in a human is simply mathematically and organically, impossible.
Indeed. Having the "consensus" believe, proclaim, and act on, impossibility, assumption, pure craziness, seems to be the main purpose of the Infallible Church of Science. One thing we can say in defense of religious theology is that its metaphysical beliefs were not materialistic or really mechanical in anyway and that left the debate about our actions mostly in the ethical or political realm. Much better. Science has reduced reality to a machine and made ethics irrelevant. Bad. In respect of this, one term from modern medicine that makes my blood boil is " mechanism of action". I feel like yelling that I am not a bloody machine. One other thing re your comment here it seems that I may even more of a science skeptic than you as I certainly do not think micro biology is real at all. Just as I see no evidence that the earth moves or is billions of years old or is made from atoms - as you mention - and so on, I see no good evidence that infectious disease has a single external environmental cause or that one outside "thing" causes another inside "thing" inside a living organism.
Totally agree with you on disease. I used to stupidly believe in 'germs' until researching the chain of events which would pass a viral genomic structure between creatures and species. No evidence supports this nor modern medicine's theology on mechanistic processes causing a disease. Endless time cannot create a single cell through naturalism, nor a single bacteria which when toxified from our poisoned tissues could indeed spread disease.
Agreed. I dream of going back to the world before science. Much better. Much more human. Much cleaner. And to top it all, the educated actually read books, many of which were actually good. What we have now is an intellectual dark age of utter confusion before the robot take over, followed, no doubt, by the cull. Bad.