Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David O'Halloran's avatar

Excellent summary of your previous posts Thanks. I always sensed Einstein was nonsense for the simple reason that I could not even begin to understand it. My policy has always been if you can't understand something after looking closely at it, it is probably meaningless. Einstein was apparently describing the physical nature of the universe and yet what he says incomprehensible to me, nor could I find a book or any person who could explain it. Truth by a consensus of the ignorant. therefore I conclude his theory is not a good one and is probably not true. Here you have shown in a detailed way how his theory is not true. Finally you wrote:

"The fact that for 100 years ‘The Science’ has promoted this junk science to dogmatic narrative to be slavishly followed and venerated does not paint a pretty picture of our society, or our collective intelligence."

I agree with you. But why was this theory elevated to the status of infallible truth? Who elevated it? Why is it impossible to question?

For me it is not just this theory which is wrong, which it clearly is, but most of science full stop. Science is not what we used to think science was - that is, following the evidence - science has become whatever nonsense our true rulers want us to believe in for any reason they want us to believe it. It has become a religion without a creed, ritual, dogma, or cannon that can be anything they want it to be whenever they like.

Poor us. Look what they did to us in covid. They actually managed to get people to voluntarily inject themselves with an untested unknown substance on the back of a fear campaign by pure trust in science alone. Imagine they had a poison that killed people within five years but not immediately. That would mean they had just used their control of 'The Science' to wipe out the human race.

Expand full comment
Men's Media Network's avatar

So there’s actual sketchy gravity math to “validate” the sketchy bowling ball on the rubber sheet gravity demonstration. I was almost thrown out of physics class as a young EE student for pointing out the tautological nuttiness of the rubber sheet demonstration. But I was only a mediocre math student, so it was easy for them to shut me up. But how did so many physicists cave to this con as it was introduced to the world?

Expand full comment
13 more comments...

No posts