12 Comments
User's avatar
Henry Solospiritus's avatar

Oh and, the most profound question for me is, why the hell do so many people “want to believe it”? What’s the juice?

Dr Ferdinand Santos III's avatar

Hard to say what people get out of the cult of Scientism or ‘following the science’. It seems to be a cult where they proclaim themselves to be superior, ennobled, the ‘leaders’ and ‘thinkers’…..in actual fact they are the opposite, following like sheeple and doing what the ‘experts’ demand, or believing what the high priests say. It is a religious phenomenon I guess.

INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

A cult indeed. Science for me, is what works. A bucket of 8 liters holds 8 liters of water (unless of course there is no top rim, then it will hold slightly less, or it would run over if you pick it up). It is very clear why animals don't do science. Most of it seems to be crap. Thanks to your articles I feel a bit less stupid LOLOL

Dr Ferdinand Santos III's avatar

Anytime Ingrid, glad they are helpful. Critical thinking and common sense have been replaced by deference to authority and dogma. The standard models in any domain are very religious, regardless of what the sermonisers say otherwise. The system is very corrupt and quite efficient at dismembering dissent.

Henry Solospiritus's avatar

From a mind of no account! I have read, listened to and been shown the Einstein stuff. I’m sorry to report, I feel exactly as though I have been listening to tales of UFOs. There is no traction! Things don’t add up! It doesn’t resonate! There is no vacuum or empty space! The Cosmos is brimming with stuff. Entities abound.

Roy's avatar

Einstein wasn’t even competent at math as shown by Aussie mathematician Martin Strothers

Roy's avatar

Yes, Stephen Crothrers, my bad

Dr Ferdinand Santos III's avatar

Thanks Roy, will definitely be reading his material! Cheers

Max V. Carp's avatar

You mean Stephen Crothers??

Dr Ferdinand Santos III's avatar

Yes Painleve and Poincare also pointed out the tautological nature of his maths. Retic wrong a book on the same. Covered some similar points here https://unstabbinated.substack.com/p/relativitys-maths-are-incorrect-and?utm_source=publication-search

Tim West's avatar

Fantastic essay. Loving all your stuff. I did Maths with QM at Cambridge. 39 years ago! Have kept up with everything. Had Bondi as a lecturer. Have always thought / hang on this doesn’t really hang together.

I have - because no-one else has - defined what science / sanity are in the Two Colour protocol for this Sperate

Separate truth from stories

https://open.substack.com/pub/beyondcertainty/p/science-the-avoidance-of-delusion

The Mick's avatar

Great Article!

As a young student when the "impossible" numbers" appeared in the teaching of mathematics, it set off alarm bells.....🧐

"The system of numerology flawed?

By it's own mechanics, disproving it's very existence." ~ Mick." 😂

Cosmic background noise, would be a substrate and medium for transmission and formation.

Like a rock in a japanese garden,

is what we are......

Singular (heart vortex) Harmonic disruptions in the Aether.

High altitude more positive charge.

Earth negative charge.

1 and O

We exist in the flux field

(fuzzy logic 😂)

state disrupting the

cosmic background radiation created by the polarizing potential of our environment.

The "hiss" on the static TV (no channel tuned) would be the best visual and audible example (to date, hmmmm.) for a narrow representation of the Aether.

Look forward to more, you're a very clever chap 🧐

Cheers,

Michael.